The key role of digital ambidextrous capabilities in cross-boundary innovation: Moderating effects of technological diversification and environmental turbulence
{"title":"The key role of digital ambidextrous capabilities in cross-boundary innovation: Moderating effects of technological diversification and environmental turbulence","authors":"Xiaobin Feng, Bowen Xiao, Hanzhong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the importance of digital technology in fostering cross-boundary innovation (CBI) has attracted increasing attention from scholars and practitioners, research gaps persist concerning how firms’ capabilities in leveraging digital technologies influence CBI and the boundary conditions that either facilitate or impede its effectiveness. Based on firm capability theory, this study distinguishes firms’ digital ambidextrous capabilities to achieve different digital goals from an organisational ambidexterity perspective. Using fixed effects and interaction effects models to analyse data from 730 publicly listed Chinese firms, this investigation explores the roles of digital exploratory capability (DERC) and digital exploitative capability (DEIC) in enhancing CBI. The results indicate that DERC and DEIC substantially foster CBI. Technological diversification acts as a positive moderator in the relationship between DERC and CBI, whilst exhibiting an inverted U-shaped moderation between DEIC and CBI. Furthermore, environmental turbulence moderates the relationship between DERC and CBI in an inverted U-shape and positively moderates the relationship between DEIC and CBI. Additionally, SOEs are more reliant on DEIC for CBI and less susceptible to environmental turbulence. This study provides new managerial insights for firms to establish and leverage digital ambidextrous capabilities to achieve CBI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101895"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923474825000360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the importance of digital technology in fostering cross-boundary innovation (CBI) has attracted increasing attention from scholars and practitioners, research gaps persist concerning how firms’ capabilities in leveraging digital technologies influence CBI and the boundary conditions that either facilitate or impede its effectiveness. Based on firm capability theory, this study distinguishes firms’ digital ambidextrous capabilities to achieve different digital goals from an organisational ambidexterity perspective. Using fixed effects and interaction effects models to analyse data from 730 publicly listed Chinese firms, this investigation explores the roles of digital exploratory capability (DERC) and digital exploitative capability (DEIC) in enhancing CBI. The results indicate that DERC and DEIC substantially foster CBI. Technological diversification acts as a positive moderator in the relationship between DERC and CBI, whilst exhibiting an inverted U-shaped moderation between DEIC and CBI. Furthermore, environmental turbulence moderates the relationship between DERC and CBI in an inverted U-shape and positively moderates the relationship between DEIC and CBI. Additionally, SOEs are more reliant on DEIC for CBI and less susceptible to environmental turbulence. This study provides new managerial insights for firms to establish and leverage digital ambidextrous capabilities to achieve CBI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (JET-M) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology, innovation, and engineering management.
The journal links engineering, science, and management disciplines. It addresses the issues involved in the planning, development, and implementation of technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and operational objectives of an organization. It covers not only R&D management, but also the entire spectrum of managerial concerns in technology-based organizations. This includes issues relating to new product development, human resource management, innovation process management, project management, technological fusion, marketing, technological forecasting and strategic planning.
The journal provides an interface between technology and other corporate functions, such as R&D, marketing, manufacturing and administration. Its ultimate goal is to make a profound contribution to theory development, research and practice by serving as a leading forum for the publication of scholarly research on all aspects of technology, innovation, and engineering management.