An analysis on OpenMetBuoy-v2021 drifter in-situ data and Lagrangian trajectory simulations in the Agulhas Current System

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Bente Moerman , Øyvind Breivik , Lars R. Hole , Gaute Hope , Johnny A. Johannessen , Jean Rabault
{"title":"An analysis on OpenMetBuoy-v2021 drifter in-situ data and Lagrangian trajectory simulations in the Agulhas Current System","authors":"Bente Moerman ,&nbsp;Øyvind Breivik ,&nbsp;Lars R. Hole ,&nbsp;Gaute Hope ,&nbsp;Johnny A. Johannessen ,&nbsp;Jean Rabault","doi":"10.1016/j.apor.2025.104649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary objective of this study is to perform a sensitivity analysis of Lagrangian trajectory models. Trajectory simulations have been compared to six OpenMetBuoy-v2021 drifter trajectories in the Agulhas Current System (Jan–Mar 2023). Three different Lagrangian trajectory simulations have been assessed: (1) two offline Lagrangian tracking tools, OpenDrift and Parcels, (2) three Eulerian ocean surface current products, HYCOM, Mercator and Globcurrent, and (3) the addition of wind and/or wave forcing parameterizations. The latter has also been evaluated by strong ocean current, high wind speed and Stokes drift regimes.</div><div>Firstly, using the same time stepping scheme and linear interpolation methods, the different Lagrangian simulators OpenDrift and Parcels, performed identically. Secondly, the Globcurrent product showed the highest mean skill of the three ocean current products, although it underestimated the speed for strong ocean currents due to its spatial resolution. The HYCOM and Mercator model simulations showed, respectively, 40% and 15% lower skill than the Globcurrent simulations. Finally, the addition of the Stokes drift and a wind drift factor (WDF), improved the Lagrangian simulation performance in skill and speed, especially in high wind (<span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span>10 m/s) and/or Stokes drift regimes (<span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span>0.15 m/s). The optimal WDF for the OpenMetBuoy-v2021 is found to be 1.8% and 2.3% for simulations including and excluding Stokes drift forcing respectively. To further improve the incorporation of Stokes drift and direct wind drag on the trajectory simulations, a more physically based solution is advised as there are still numerous wind and wave related processes that remain unresolved, like wave–current interactions and vertical shear.</div><div>To statistically strengthen the conclusions from this research, incorporating additional observed drifter trajectories would be highly favourable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8261,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ocean Research","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104649"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ocean Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118725002366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to perform a sensitivity analysis of Lagrangian trajectory models. Trajectory simulations have been compared to six OpenMetBuoy-v2021 drifter trajectories in the Agulhas Current System (Jan–Mar 2023). Three different Lagrangian trajectory simulations have been assessed: (1) two offline Lagrangian tracking tools, OpenDrift and Parcels, (2) three Eulerian ocean surface current products, HYCOM, Mercator and Globcurrent, and (3) the addition of wind and/or wave forcing parameterizations. The latter has also been evaluated by strong ocean current, high wind speed and Stokes drift regimes.
Firstly, using the same time stepping scheme and linear interpolation methods, the different Lagrangian simulators OpenDrift and Parcels, performed identically. Secondly, the Globcurrent product showed the highest mean skill of the three ocean current products, although it underestimated the speed for strong ocean currents due to its spatial resolution. The HYCOM and Mercator model simulations showed, respectively, 40% and 15% lower skill than the Globcurrent simulations. Finally, the addition of the Stokes drift and a wind drift factor (WDF), improved the Lagrangian simulation performance in skill and speed, especially in high wind (>10 m/s) and/or Stokes drift regimes (>0.15 m/s). The optimal WDF for the OpenMetBuoy-v2021 is found to be 1.8% and 2.3% for simulations including and excluding Stokes drift forcing respectively. To further improve the incorporation of Stokes drift and direct wind drag on the trajectory simulations, a more physically based solution is advised as there are still numerous wind and wave related processes that remain unresolved, like wave–current interactions and vertical shear.
To statistically strengthen the conclusions from this research, incorporating additional observed drifter trajectories would be highly favourable.

Abstract Image

OpenMetBuoy-v2021漂船原位数据分析及Agulhas流系统拉格朗日轨迹模拟
本研究的主要目的是对拉格朗日轨迹模型进行灵敏度分析。轨迹模拟与Agulhas洋流系统(2023年1月至3月)中的六个OpenMetBuoy-v2021漂移轨迹进行了比较。本文评估了三种不同的拉格朗日轨迹模拟:(1)两种离线拉格朗日跟踪工具,OpenDrift和包裹;(2)三种欧拉海洋表面流产品,HYCOM, Mercator和Globcurrent;(3)增加风和/或波浪强迫参数化。后者也通过强海流、高风速和斯托克斯漂移制度进行了评估。首先,使用相同的时间步进方案和线性插值方法,不同的拉格朗日模拟器OpenDrift和包裹,执行相同。其次,由于其空间分辨率的原因,Globcurrent产品低估了强海流的速度,但在三个海流产品中显示出最高的平均技能。HYCOM和墨卡托模型的模拟分别显示,与Globcurrent模拟相比,技能水平低40%和15%。最后,加入Stokes漂移和风漂移因子(WDF),提高了拉格朗日模拟在技巧和速度上的性能,特别是在大风(>10 m/s)和/或Stokes漂移(>0.15 m/s)条件下。OpenMetBuoy-v2021的最佳WDF分别为1.8%和2.3%,包括和不包括Stokes漂移强迫的模拟。为了进一步改善Stokes漂移和直接风阻在轨迹模拟中的结合,建议采用更基于物理的解决方案,因为仍有许多与风和波相关的过程尚未解决,如波流相互作用和垂直切变。为了从统计上加强这项研究的结论,纳入额外观察到的漂流者轨迹将是非常有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ocean Research
Applied Ocean Research 地学-工程:大洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.00%
发文量
316
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Applied Ocean Research is to encourage the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信