Experimental and numerical study of optimizing thermal and electrical performances of the photovoltaic wall through array row spacing

IF 6.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Yan Zhou , Dangdang Dong , Xiaoyu Jin
{"title":"Experimental and numerical study of optimizing thermal and electrical performances of the photovoltaic wall through array row spacing","authors":"Yan Zhou ,&nbsp;Dangdang Dong ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facade-integrated photovoltaic modules are often restricted to parallel walls, causing poor heat dissipation and leading to overheating as well as power loss. This study combines experimental and numerical approaches to optimize vertical (height) and horizontal (width) inter-row spacings for photovoltaic panel with optimal layout graphene sheet, enhancing heat dissipation and maximizing installation density. Experiments reveal that two vertically stacked panels with zero spacing compared with the single panel, exhibits an average temperature rise of 1.93°C, power reduction of 0.68 W/m<sup>2</sup>, and exterior wall temperature increase of 1.16°C. In contrast, two horizontally stacked panels with zero spacing show milder performance degradation, which exhibits 0.97 °C increase in average temperature, 0.35 W/m<sup>2</sup> decrease in average output power and 0.78 °C rise in average exterior wall temperature. Furthermore, experiment conducted with height spacings of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mm demonstrate that the rate of thermal and electrical performance improvement plateaus when height spacing surpasses 150 mm. Similarly, experiments on different width spacings show that performance improvement becomes marginal when width spacing exceeds 100 mm. Numerical simulations of 2 × 2 panel arrays confirm that height spacing of 150 mm and width spacing of 100 mm optimally balance cooling and spatial efficiency, with results aligning with experimental data and highlighting the dominant role of height spacing in natural convection. Finally, the airflow velocity images in air gap are analyzed, and results mechanistically validate experimental observations. Our findings provide more comprehensive and practical solution for enhancing photovoltaic wall performance in urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 127317"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135943112501909X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facade-integrated photovoltaic modules are often restricted to parallel walls, causing poor heat dissipation and leading to overheating as well as power loss. This study combines experimental and numerical approaches to optimize vertical (height) and horizontal (width) inter-row spacings for photovoltaic panel with optimal layout graphene sheet, enhancing heat dissipation and maximizing installation density. Experiments reveal that two vertically stacked panels with zero spacing compared with the single panel, exhibits an average temperature rise of 1.93°C, power reduction of 0.68 W/m2, and exterior wall temperature increase of 1.16°C. In contrast, two horizontally stacked panels with zero spacing show milder performance degradation, which exhibits 0.97 °C increase in average temperature, 0.35 W/m2 decrease in average output power and 0.78 °C rise in average exterior wall temperature. Furthermore, experiment conducted with height spacings of 50, 100, 150, and 200 mm demonstrate that the rate of thermal and electrical performance improvement plateaus when height spacing surpasses 150 mm. Similarly, experiments on different width spacings show that performance improvement becomes marginal when width spacing exceeds 100 mm. Numerical simulations of 2 × 2 panel arrays confirm that height spacing of 150 mm and width spacing of 100 mm optimally balance cooling and spatial efficiency, with results aligning with experimental data and highlighting the dominant role of height spacing in natural convection. Finally, the airflow velocity images in air gap are analyzed, and results mechanistically validate experimental observations. Our findings provide more comprehensive and practical solution for enhancing photovoltaic wall performance in urban environments.
通过阵列行间距优化光伏墙热电性能的实验与数值研究
立面集成光伏组件通常被限制在平行的墙壁上,导致散热不良,导致过热和功率损失。本研究结合实验和数值方法,优化石墨烯片布局光伏板的垂直(高度)和水平(宽度)行间距,增强散热并最大化安装密度。实验结果表明,与单面板相比,零间距垂直堆叠两块面板平均温升1.93℃,功耗降低0.68 W/m2,外墙温升1.16℃。相比之下,零间距水平堆叠面板的性能下降幅度较小,平均温度升高0.97℃,平均输出功率降低0.35 W/m2,平均外墙温度升高0.78℃。此外,在高度间距为50、100、150和200 mm时进行的实验表明,当高度间距超过150 mm时,热学和电学性能的改善速度趋于平稳。同样,对不同宽度间距的实验表明,当宽度间距超过100 mm时,性能的提高是微乎其微的。对2 × 2面板阵列的数值模拟证实,高间距为150 mm和宽间距为100 mm时,冷却效率和空间效率达到了最佳平衡,结果与实验数据一致,突出了高间距对自然对流的主导作用。最后,对气隙内的气流速度图像进行了分析,得到的结果在力学上验证了实验结果。我们的研究结果为提高城市环境中光伏墙体的性能提供了更全面和实用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信