Actors' participation and power manifestations in tax regimes of small-scale tree growing

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ubaldus J. Tumaini , Irmeli Mustalahti , Aristarik H. Maro , Edda T. Lwoga
{"title":"Actors' participation and power manifestations in tax regimes of small-scale tree growing","authors":"Ubaldus J. Tumaini ,&nbsp;Irmeli Mustalahti ,&nbsp;Aristarik H. Maro ,&nbsp;Edda T. Lwoga","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-scale tree growing is a rapidly expanding yet overlooked subsector with distinct challenges. While most national forest policies target large-scale plantations, they fail to address the unique needs of small-scale tree growing sub-sector. This paper highlights research and policy gaps and examines inconsistencies in local tax decisions and timber trade regulations affecting this subsector, calling for targeted reforms. A pre-study and snowball sampling technique was used to choose a total of 28 informants who took part in two rounds of data collection in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. The informants included actors who are village and urban-based tree growers, farm service providers, business persons, NGOs and government officials. These actors are not mutually exclusive; a village-based farmer may be a timber buyer or a government official may also be a tree farmer. Using qualitative content analysis, our empirical data shows how government agencies control the decision-making processes regarding taxes and levies. Small-scale non-state actors are consulted for input, but taxing authorities retain final decision-making power. This leads to distrust between small-scale tree growers and government tax agencies, discouraging future investment in the subsector. We conclude that there is inadequate participation of non-state actors, mostly tax papers, in the entire decision-making process, resulting in decisions that disregard their interests. Targeted forest policies that explicitly address the needs of small-scale tree growers should be developed. In addition, a thorough research is required to examine taxation practices from other countries where small-scale tree growing is national interest and integrated into national policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small-scale tree growing is a rapidly expanding yet overlooked subsector with distinct challenges. While most national forest policies target large-scale plantations, they fail to address the unique needs of small-scale tree growing sub-sector. This paper highlights research and policy gaps and examines inconsistencies in local tax decisions and timber trade regulations affecting this subsector, calling for targeted reforms. A pre-study and snowball sampling technique was used to choose a total of 28 informants who took part in two rounds of data collection in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. The informants included actors who are village and urban-based tree growers, farm service providers, business persons, NGOs and government officials. These actors are not mutually exclusive; a village-based farmer may be a timber buyer or a government official may also be a tree farmer. Using qualitative content analysis, our empirical data shows how government agencies control the decision-making processes regarding taxes and levies. Small-scale non-state actors are consulted for input, but taxing authorities retain final decision-making power. This leads to distrust between small-scale tree growers and government tax agencies, discouraging future investment in the subsector. We conclude that there is inadequate participation of non-state actors, mostly tax papers, in the entire decision-making process, resulting in decisions that disregard their interests. Targeted forest policies that explicitly address the needs of small-scale tree growers should be developed. In addition, a thorough research is required to examine taxation practices from other countries where small-scale tree growing is national interest and integrated into national policies.
小规模林木种植税收制度中的行动者参与与权力表现
小规模树木种植是一个快速扩张但被忽视的细分行业,面临着明显的挑战。虽然大多数国家森林政策以大规模人工林为目标,但它们未能解决小规模树木种植分部门的独特需求。本文强调了研究和政策差距,审查了影响该分部门的地方税收决策和木材贸易法规的不一致之处,呼吁进行有针对性的改革。采用预研究和滚雪球抽样技术选择了28名在坦桑尼亚南部高地参加两轮数据收集的举报人。举报人包括乡村和城市的树木种植者、农场服务提供者、商业人士、非政府组织和政府官员。这些行动者并非相互排斥;以村庄为基础的农民可能是木材买家,或者政府官员也可能是树木种植者。采用定性内容分析,我们的实证数据显示了政府机构如何控制有关税收和征税的决策过程。小规模的非国家行为体被征求意见,但税务机关保留最终决策权。这导致了小规模树木种植者和政府税务机构之间的不信任,阻碍了未来对该部门的投资。我们的结论是,在整个决策过程中,非国家行为体(主要是税务文件)的参与不足,导致决策忽视了他们的利益。应当制定明确解决小规模林木种植者需要的目标明确的森林政策。此外,需要进行彻底的研究,以审查其他国家的税收做法,这些国家的小规模树木种植是国家利益,并纳入国家政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信