Ubaldus J. Tumaini , Irmeli Mustalahti , Aristarik H. Maro , Edda T. Lwoga
{"title":"Actors' participation and power manifestations in tax regimes of small-scale tree growing","authors":"Ubaldus J. Tumaini , Irmeli Mustalahti , Aristarik H. Maro , Edda T. Lwoga","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-scale tree growing is a rapidly expanding yet overlooked subsector with distinct challenges. While most national forest policies target large-scale plantations, they fail to address the unique needs of small-scale tree growing sub-sector. This paper highlights research and policy gaps and examines inconsistencies in local tax decisions and timber trade regulations affecting this subsector, calling for targeted reforms. A pre-study and snowball sampling technique was used to choose a total of 28 informants who took part in two rounds of data collection in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. The informants included actors who are village and urban-based tree growers, farm service providers, business persons, NGOs and government officials. These actors are not mutually exclusive; a village-based farmer may be a timber buyer or a government official may also be a tree farmer. Using qualitative content analysis, our empirical data shows how government agencies control the decision-making processes regarding taxes and levies. Small-scale non-state actors are consulted for input, but taxing authorities retain final decision-making power. This leads to distrust between small-scale tree growers and government tax agencies, discouraging future investment in the subsector. We conclude that there is inadequate participation of non-state actors, mostly tax papers, in the entire decision-making process, resulting in decisions that disregard their interests. Targeted forest policies that explicitly address the needs of small-scale tree growers should be developed. In addition, a thorough research is required to examine taxation practices from other countries where small-scale tree growing is national interest and integrated into national policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 103570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Small-scale tree growing is a rapidly expanding yet overlooked subsector with distinct challenges. While most national forest policies target large-scale plantations, they fail to address the unique needs of small-scale tree growing sub-sector. This paper highlights research and policy gaps and examines inconsistencies in local tax decisions and timber trade regulations affecting this subsector, calling for targeted reforms. A pre-study and snowball sampling technique was used to choose a total of 28 informants who took part in two rounds of data collection in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. The informants included actors who are village and urban-based tree growers, farm service providers, business persons, NGOs and government officials. These actors are not mutually exclusive; a village-based farmer may be a timber buyer or a government official may also be a tree farmer. Using qualitative content analysis, our empirical data shows how government agencies control the decision-making processes regarding taxes and levies. Small-scale non-state actors are consulted for input, but taxing authorities retain final decision-making power. This leads to distrust between small-scale tree growers and government tax agencies, discouraging future investment in the subsector. We conclude that there is inadequate participation of non-state actors, mostly tax papers, in the entire decision-making process, resulting in decisions that disregard their interests. Targeted forest policies that explicitly address the needs of small-scale tree growers should be developed. In addition, a thorough research is required to examine taxation practices from other countries where small-scale tree growing is national interest and integrated into national policies.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.