Schiff bases derived from 2,3-dimethoxylbenzaldehydes as antioxidant and antidiabetes agents: Synthesis, structural analysis, DFT computational, molecular docking and in vitro studies

IF 2.5 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Segun D. Oladipo , Robert C. Luckay , Kolawole A. Olofinsan
{"title":"Schiff bases derived from 2,3-dimethoxylbenzaldehydes as antioxidant and antidiabetes agents: Synthesis, structural analysis, DFT computational, molecular docking and in vitro studies","authors":"Segun D. Oladipo ,&nbsp;Robert C. Luckay ,&nbsp;Kolawole A. Olofinsan","doi":"10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Five Schiff base compounds were prepared by the condensation reaction between 2,3-dimethoxylbenzaldehyde and a series of amino-compounds. These were (<em>E</em>)-5-chloro-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)phenol (<strong>DMC</strong>), (<em>E</em>)-<em>N</em>-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine (<strong>DMCF</strong>), (<em>E</em>)-1-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(4-fluorophenyl)methanimine (<strong>DMF</strong>), (<em>E</em>)-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-4-methylphenol (<strong>DMM</strong>), and (<em>E</em>)-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-5-nitrophenol <strong>(DMN)</strong>. These compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic techniques such as UV–visible, FT-IR, NMR (<sup>1</sup>H &amp; <sup>13</sup>C) and mass spectrometry while elemental/combustion analysis was explored to confirm the purity of the compounds. Furthermore, the structures of <strong>DMM</strong> and <strong>DMCF</strong> were confirmed using the single crystal-Xray crystallography technique. In these structures, the central C9—C8—N7—C5(C6) plane is inclined to 2,3-dimethoxyphenyl ring at 8.59° and 2.01° for <strong>DMM</strong> and <strong>DMCF</strong> while it inclined to the phenol ring at 23.14° and 23.64° for <strong>DMM</strong> and <strong>DMCF</strong> respectively. Calculations using quantum chemistry showed that molecules with a hydroxyl group have a lower energy bandgap (∆E) than those without one. The α-amylase and α-glucosidase assays were employed to assess the ability of the compounds to treat diabetes. In both assays, all the compounds showed good antidiabetes activities except <strong>DMN</strong>. However, none of the compounds outperformed acarbose. Compound <strong>DMF</strong> displayed the highest α-amylase inhibitory potential with IC<sub>50</sub> value of 122.55 μΜ while <strong>DMC</strong> with IC<sub>50</sub> value of 88.50 μΜ exhibited the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory potential when compared to other compounds evaluated for both assays. Nitric oxide (NO), ferric reducing ability power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays were used to measure the compounds' antioxidant capability. All the compounds showed excellent antioxidant potential and outshined vanillin (standard drug) in all the assays. Hydroxyl-containing compounds performed better than those without the hydroxyl group. For example, in DPPH assay, <strong>DMC</strong> has the highest DPPH free radical scavenging activity, with IC<sub>50</sub> value of 50.30 μM, followed by <strong>DMM</strong> and <strong>DMN</strong> having IC<sub>50</sub> values of 58.42 μM and 63.43 μM respectively. All the compounds complied with Lipinski's Ro5, suggesting that, they are less toxic and orally bioavailable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":420,"journal":{"name":"Results in Chemistry","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 102471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211715625004540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five Schiff base compounds were prepared by the condensation reaction between 2,3-dimethoxylbenzaldehyde and a series of amino-compounds. These were (E)-5-chloro-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)phenol (DMC), (E)-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-1-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine (DMCF), (E)-1-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-(4-fluorophenyl)methanimine (DMF), (E)-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-4-methylphenol (DMM), and (E)-2-((2,3-dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-5-nitrophenol (DMN). These compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic techniques such as UV–visible, FT-IR, NMR (1H & 13C) and mass spectrometry while elemental/combustion analysis was explored to confirm the purity of the compounds. Furthermore, the structures of DMM and DMCF were confirmed using the single crystal-Xray crystallography technique. In these structures, the central C9—C8—N7—C5(C6) plane is inclined to 2,3-dimethoxyphenyl ring at 8.59° and 2.01° for DMM and DMCF while it inclined to the phenol ring at 23.14° and 23.64° for DMM and DMCF respectively. Calculations using quantum chemistry showed that molecules with a hydroxyl group have a lower energy bandgap (∆E) than those without one. The α-amylase and α-glucosidase assays were employed to assess the ability of the compounds to treat diabetes. In both assays, all the compounds showed good antidiabetes activities except DMN. However, none of the compounds outperformed acarbose. Compound DMF displayed the highest α-amylase inhibitory potential with IC50 value of 122.55 μΜ while DMC with IC50 value of 88.50 μΜ exhibited the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory potential when compared to other compounds evaluated for both assays. Nitric oxide (NO), ferric reducing ability power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays were used to measure the compounds' antioxidant capability. All the compounds showed excellent antioxidant potential and outshined vanillin (standard drug) in all the assays. Hydroxyl-containing compounds performed better than those without the hydroxyl group. For example, in DPPH assay, DMC has the highest DPPH free radical scavenging activity, with IC50 value of 50.30 μM, followed by DMM and DMN having IC50 values of 58.42 μM and 63.43 μM respectively. All the compounds complied with Lipinski's Ro5, suggesting that, they are less toxic and orally bioavailable.

Abstract Image

2,3-二甲氧基苯甲醛衍生的希夫碱抗氧化和抗糖尿病:合成、结构分析、DFT计算、分子对接和体外研究
以2,3-二甲氧基苯甲醛和一系列氨基化合物为原料,通过缩合反应制备了5个席夫碱化合物。它们分别是(E)-5-氯-2-(2,3-二甲氧基苄基)氨基)苯酚(DMC)、(E)- n -(3-氯-4-氟苯基)-1-(2,3-二甲氧基苯基)- n -(4-氟苯基)甲基亚胺(DMF)、(E)-2-((2,3-二甲氧基苄基)氨基)-4-甲基苯酚(DMM)和(E)-2-((2,3-二甲氧基苄基)氨基)-5-硝基苯酚(DMN)。这些化合物通过紫外可见光谱、红外光谱、核磁共振(1H &;13C)和质谱分析,同时探索元素/燃烧分析来确认化合物的纯度。利用单晶- x射线晶体学技术对DMM和DMCF的结构进行了确证。在这些结构中,C9-C8-N7-C5 (C6)平面向2,3-二甲氧基苯环倾斜,DMM和DMCF分别为8.59°和2.01°,DMM和DMCF分别为23.14°和23.64°。量子化学计算表明,有羟基的分子比没有羟基的分子具有更低的能带隙(∆E)。采用α-淀粉酶和α-葡萄糖苷酶测定评价化合物治疗糖尿病的能力。除DMN外,其余化合物均表现出良好的抗糖尿病活性。然而,没有一种化合物的性能优于阿卡波糖。化合物DMF α-淀粉酶抑制电位最高,IC50值为122.55 μΜ; DMC α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制电位最高,IC50值为88.50 μΜ。采用一氧化氮(NO)、铁还原能力(FRAP)和2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼(DPPH)测定化合物的抗氧化能力。所有化合物均表现出优异的抗氧化能力,且各项指标均优于香兰素(标准药物)。含羟基化合物比不含羟基的化合物表现更好。在DPPH实验中,DMC对DPPH自由基的清除能力最强,IC50值为50.30 μM,其次是DMM和DMN, IC50值分别为58.42 μM和63.43 μM。所有化合物都符合利平斯基的Ro5,这表明它们毒性较小,并且具有口服生物利用度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Chemistry
Results in Chemistry Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
380
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信