Ethnic disparities as potential indicators of institutional racism in inpatient care within acute mental health wards: A rapid review

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Phuong Hua , Sarah-Jane Fenton , Mark Freestone , Kamaldeep Bhui , Sania Shakoor
{"title":"Ethnic disparities as potential indicators of institutional racism in inpatient care within acute mental health wards: A rapid review","authors":"Phuong Hua ,&nbsp;Sarah-Jane Fenton ,&nbsp;Mark Freestone ,&nbsp;Kamaldeep Bhui ,&nbsp;Sania Shakoor","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Previous reviews suggest minoritised ethnic patients face inequalities in aspects of inpatient care including involuntary admission and forced medication. This rapid review aimed to identify ethnic disparities in acute adult mental health care and explore to what extent these provide evidence of institutional racism, as defined by the Macpherson report.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Ovid PsycINFO, Web of Science and Ovid EMBASE were searched for studies published from January 2018 to August 2024. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools. A synthesis of the studies was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Quantitative studies (n = 34) revealed ethnic disparities in involuntary admission, psychiatric diagnoses, forced medication, physical restraint, seclusion, length of stay and access to appropriate services/facilities. Qualitative data (n = 2) revealed experiences of disempowerment, confusion and loss of autonomy. Collectively these findings mapped onto components identified as underlying institutional racism as defined by the Macpherson report.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our current evidence can be used to understand the genesis and perpetuation of insitutional racism in health care settings. This will enable us to better target intervention or change management to address issues where they arise. Further research and analyses are needed however, in order to verify whether ethnic disparities in inpatient services and treatment <em>reflect</em> or are themselves <em>exacerbated or contributed</em> to by institutional racism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Previous reviews suggest minoritised ethnic patients face inequalities in aspects of inpatient care including involuntary admission and forced medication. This rapid review aimed to identify ethnic disparities in acute adult mental health care and explore to what extent these provide evidence of institutional racism, as defined by the Macpherson report.

Methods

Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Ovid PsycINFO, Web of Science and Ovid EMBASE were searched for studies published from January 2018 to August 2024. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools. A synthesis of the studies was performed.

Results

Quantitative studies (n = 34) revealed ethnic disparities in involuntary admission, psychiatric diagnoses, forced medication, physical restraint, seclusion, length of stay and access to appropriate services/facilities. Qualitative data (n = 2) revealed experiences of disempowerment, confusion and loss of autonomy. Collectively these findings mapped onto components identified as underlying institutional racism as defined by the Macpherson report.

Conclusion

Our current evidence can be used to understand the genesis and perpetuation of insitutional racism in health care settings. This will enable us to better target intervention or change management to address issues where they arise. Further research and analyses are needed however, in order to verify whether ethnic disparities in inpatient services and treatment reflect or are themselves exacerbated or contributed to by institutional racism.

Abstract Image

种族差异作为急症精神卫生病房住院治疗中的制度性种族主义的潜在指标:快速回顾
目的先前的综述表明,少数民族患者在住院治疗方面面临不平等,包括非自愿入院和强制用药。这项快速审查旨在确定急性成人精神卫生保健中的种族差异,并探讨这些差异在多大程度上提供了Macpherson报告所定义的制度性种族主义的证据。方法检索2018年1月至2024年8月发表的文献,检索数据库为MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Ovid PsycINFO、Web of Science和Ovid EMBASE。使用乔安娜布里格斯关键评估工具评估证据的质量。对这些研究进行了综合。结果定量研究(n = 34)揭示了非自愿入院、精神诊断、强制用药、身体约束、隔离、住院时间和获得适当服务/设施方面的种族差异。定性数据(n = 2)揭示了被剥夺权力、困惑和丧失自主权的经历。总的来说,这些发现映射到麦克弗森报告中定义的潜在制度性种族主义的组成部分。结论我们目前的证据可以用来理解医疗机构种族主义的起源和延续。这将使我们能够更好地有针对性地进行干预或改变管理,以解决出现的问题。然而,需要进一步的研究和分析,以核实住院服务和治疗中的种族差异是否反映了或本身加剧或促成了制度性种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信