Association between prehospital adrenaline administration and short-term outcomes in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity-score matched analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shoji Kawakami , Hidenobu Koga , Tetsuhisa Yamada , Jun-Ichiro Nishi
{"title":"Association between prehospital adrenaline administration and short-term outcomes in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a propensity-score matched analysis","authors":"Shoji Kawakami ,&nbsp;Hidenobu Koga ,&nbsp;Tetsuhisa Yamada ,&nbsp;Jun-Ichiro Nishi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and an initial shockable rhythm undergoing extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR), the effect of adrenaline on neurological outcomes remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the association between prehospital adrenaline and clinical outcomes in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicentre, prospective study (JAAM-OHCA registry) enrolled 81,234 patients with OHCA between 2014 and 2021. Patients with an initial shockable rhythm who underwent ECPR for a cardiac cause were eligible for this study. The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days. The secondary outcome was prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or 30-day survival. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for confounding and evaluate the independent association between prehospital adrenaline and study outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1,061 patients, 442 (41.7 %) received prehospital adrenaline and 619 (58.3 %) did not. In 329 matched pairs, the prehospital ROSC rate was significantly higher in the adrenaline group (30 [9 %] vs 16 [5 %]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05–3.67, <em>P</em> = 0.03). However, 30-day survival (70 [21 %] vs 77 [23 %]; adjusted OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.61–1.28, <em>P</em> = 0.51) and a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (24 [7 %] vs 30 [9 %]; adjusted OR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.45–1.37, <em>P</em> = 0.39) were not significantly different.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with OHCA and an initial shockable rhythm who underwent ECPR, prehospital adrenaline was significantly associated with increased prehospital ROSC, but not with increased in survival and a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725001381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and an initial shockable rhythm undergoing extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR), the effect of adrenaline on neurological outcomes remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the association between prehospital adrenaline and clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Methods

This multicentre, prospective study (JAAM-OHCA registry) enrolled 81,234 patients with OHCA between 2014 and 2021. Patients with an initial shockable rhythm who underwent ECPR for a cardiac cause were eligible for this study. The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days. The secondary outcome was prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or 30-day survival. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for confounding and evaluate the independent association between prehospital adrenaline and study outcomes.

Results

Among 1,061 patients, 442 (41.7 %) received prehospital adrenaline and 619 (58.3 %) did not. In 329 matched pairs, the prehospital ROSC rate was significantly higher in the adrenaline group (30 [9 %] vs 16 [5 %]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05–3.67, P = 0.03). However, 30-day survival (70 [21 %] vs 77 [23 %]; adjusted OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.61–1.28, P = 0.51) and a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (24 [7 %] vs 30 [9 %]; adjusted OR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.45–1.37, P = 0.39) were not significantly different.

Conclusions

In patients with OHCA and an initial shockable rhythm who underwent ECPR, prehospital adrenaline was significantly associated with increased prehospital ROSC, but not with increased in survival and a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days.

Abstract Image

院前肾上腺素管理与院外接受体外心肺复苏的休克性心脏骤停患者短期预后的关系:倾向评分匹配分析
在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)和初始休克性心律患者进行体外复苏(ECPR)时,肾上腺素对神经系统预后的影响仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨院前肾上腺素与患者临床预后的关系。该多中心前瞻性研究(JAAM-OHCA注册)在2014年至2021年间纳入了81234例OHCA患者。因心脏原因接受ECPR的初始震荡性心律患者符合本研究的条件。30天的主要结果是良好的神经学结果。次要终点为院前自发循环恢复(ROSC)或30天生存率。进行倾向评分匹配分析以调整混杂因素并评估院前肾上腺素与研究结果之间的独立关联。结果1061例患者中442例(41.7%)接受院前肾上腺素治疗,619例(58.3%)未接受院前肾上腺素治疗。在329对配对患者中,肾上腺素组院前ROSC率显著高于肾上腺素组(30 [9%]vs 16 [5%]);校正优势比[OR] 1.96, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.05 ~ 3.67, P = 0.03)。然而,30天生存率(70 [21%]vs 77 [23%];调整OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61-1.28, P = 0.51)和30天良好的神经预后(24 [7%]vs 30 [9%];校正OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45-1.37, P = 0.39),差异无统计学意义。结论:在接受ECPR的OHCA和初始震荡节律患者中,院前肾上腺素与院前ROSC增加显著相关,但与生存期增加和30天良好的神经预后无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信