Raleigh D. Myers , Bridget Wadzuk , Samantha K. Chapman
{"title":"Lepidoptera abundance and diversity as a quantitative measure of ecosystem function in bioretention design","authors":"Raleigh D. Myers , Bridget Wadzuk , Samantha K. Chapman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The choices of engineers and other professionals working in urban environments can either mitigate or exacerbate drivers of ecosystem and biodiversity decline. To date, engineers designing bioretention basins for management of urban surface runoff typically have not considered implications of their design and management decisions on terrestrial ecosystem structure and function. However, a foundation of knowledge sufficient to evaluate design decisions in light of ecosystem functions exists in the fields of engineering and ecology, and this knowledge can be connected to improve design outcomes. Bioretention system functions considered in this paper are hydrologic regulation, production, nutrient retention, and habitat provisioning. We 1) review existing knowledge on the use of quantitative criteria to advance terrestrial ecosystem objectives in bioretention design, with a focus on <em>Lepidoptera</em> abundance and diversity as a proxy for these ecosystem functions, 2) report results of a literature review identifying gaps in knowledge and interdisciplinary communication limiting achievement of terrestrial ecosystem objectives, and 3) connect existing data and literature across disciplines to propose a novel design and plant choice approach to fill these gaps. A key criterion recommended as a proxy for terrestrial ecosystem function in bioretention basins is the number of <em>Lepidoptera</em> species supported in the larval stage by the plant genera selected by the designer. Designers can adjust plant choice to maximize this value, subject to tradeoffs with other design objectives and site-specific constraints. We conclude by presenting a set of questions to guide future research and providing recommendations for translating research findings into professional practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113810"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500740X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The choices of engineers and other professionals working in urban environments can either mitigate or exacerbate drivers of ecosystem and biodiversity decline. To date, engineers designing bioretention basins for management of urban surface runoff typically have not considered implications of their design and management decisions on terrestrial ecosystem structure and function. However, a foundation of knowledge sufficient to evaluate design decisions in light of ecosystem functions exists in the fields of engineering and ecology, and this knowledge can be connected to improve design outcomes. Bioretention system functions considered in this paper are hydrologic regulation, production, nutrient retention, and habitat provisioning. We 1) review existing knowledge on the use of quantitative criteria to advance terrestrial ecosystem objectives in bioretention design, with a focus on Lepidoptera abundance and diversity as a proxy for these ecosystem functions, 2) report results of a literature review identifying gaps in knowledge and interdisciplinary communication limiting achievement of terrestrial ecosystem objectives, and 3) connect existing data and literature across disciplines to propose a novel design and plant choice approach to fill these gaps. A key criterion recommended as a proxy for terrestrial ecosystem function in bioretention basins is the number of Lepidoptera species supported in the larval stage by the plant genera selected by the designer. Designers can adjust plant choice to maximize this value, subject to tradeoffs with other design objectives and site-specific constraints. We conclude by presenting a set of questions to guide future research and providing recommendations for translating research findings into professional practice.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.