Annelise Rosa-Fontana , Daniel Aguado-López , Clara Jabal Uriel , María Buendía Abad , Mariano Higes , M. Alice Pinto , Dora Henriques , Simone Tosi , Juan Miguel Rodríguez , Claudio Alba , Raquel Martín-Hernández
{"title":"Bee gut microbiota as an emerging endpoint for the environmental risk assessment of pesticides","authors":"Annelise Rosa-Fontana , Daniel Aguado-López , Clara Jabal Uriel , María Buendía Abad , Mariano Higes , M. Alice Pinto , Dora Henriques , Simone Tosi , Juan Miguel Rodríguez , Claudio Alba , Raquel Martín-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pollinator health is increasingly threatened by multiple stressors, including climate change, nutritional imbalances, pathogens, and pesticides. Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) aims to evaluate the potential environmental harm of pesticides and regulate their use in agriculture. However, current ERA frameworks present significant shortcomings, particularly in addressing sublethal and microbiota-mediated effects. Incorporating bee gut microbiota as a biomarker-based monitoring tool could substantially strengthen pesticide risk assessments. In this work, we advocate for the inclusion of bee gut microbiota as a novel endpoint in ERA of pesticides. Using honey bees as a model, we discuss the robustness of gut microbiota as a comparative basis across laboratory and field environments. We also highlight its potential for early detection of sublethal impacts within shorter timeframes, facilitating more sensitive and cost-effective evaluations. Finally, we propose strategies to integrate microbiota-based endpoints into existing ERA frameworks and discuss recent advances and future research directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"993 ","pages":"Article 179977"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725016171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pollinator health is increasingly threatened by multiple stressors, including climate change, nutritional imbalances, pathogens, and pesticides. Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) aims to evaluate the potential environmental harm of pesticides and regulate their use in agriculture. However, current ERA frameworks present significant shortcomings, particularly in addressing sublethal and microbiota-mediated effects. Incorporating bee gut microbiota as a biomarker-based monitoring tool could substantially strengthen pesticide risk assessments. In this work, we advocate for the inclusion of bee gut microbiota as a novel endpoint in ERA of pesticides. Using honey bees as a model, we discuss the robustness of gut microbiota as a comparative basis across laboratory and field environments. We also highlight its potential for early detection of sublethal impacts within shorter timeframes, facilitating more sensitive and cost-effective evaluations. Finally, we propose strategies to integrate microbiota-based endpoints into existing ERA frameworks and discuss recent advances and future research directions.
期刊介绍:
The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.
The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.