{"title":"Operational efficiency and service quality of Indian electricity distribution utilities: A three-stage DEA and Malmquist Index analysis","authors":"Sufia, Anoop Singh, Shambhavi Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Indian power sector has progressed through distinct phases of reform and restructuring to attract private investment and enhance both operational and financial performance. Despite two decades of reforms, the sector's financial stability remains closely tied to the performance of electricity distribution utilities. The tariff-setting framework for distribution utilities largely relies on cost-of-service regulation, incorporating performance improvement targets. However, the prudence checks for approving distribution utilities' costs often lack a benchmarking approach. Distribution utilities exhibit variability in costs, service quality, and operational efficiency. Previous studies on Indian distribution utilities have focused on operational and financial parameters while neglecting the service quality dimensions of utilities. This paper considers service quality in the form of reliability indices of Indian distribution utilities for the first time, in addition to traditional parameters. This study employs a novel three-stage data envelopment analysis (3S-DEA) approach to evaluate operational efficiency, while the Malmquist Index is implemented to analyse efficiency and technological change from 2016–17 to 2019–20. Significant differences in the performance of distribution utilities within the same state were observed. Improvements in efficiency scores are observed for the distribution utilities after considering service quality parameters. The findings highlight the importance of considering service quality parameters when evaluating the operational efficiency of distribution utilities. The results obtained from this study will be helpful for policymakers, regulators, and utility management in identifying inefficiency determinants and designing effective strategies to improve operational performance. Furthermore, such periodical benchmarking exercises could be incorporated into the review process by Indian state regulators to better incentivise or penalise utilities based on their performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102001"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500116X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Indian power sector has progressed through distinct phases of reform and restructuring to attract private investment and enhance both operational and financial performance. Despite two decades of reforms, the sector's financial stability remains closely tied to the performance of electricity distribution utilities. The tariff-setting framework for distribution utilities largely relies on cost-of-service regulation, incorporating performance improvement targets. However, the prudence checks for approving distribution utilities' costs often lack a benchmarking approach. Distribution utilities exhibit variability in costs, service quality, and operational efficiency. Previous studies on Indian distribution utilities have focused on operational and financial parameters while neglecting the service quality dimensions of utilities. This paper considers service quality in the form of reliability indices of Indian distribution utilities for the first time, in addition to traditional parameters. This study employs a novel three-stage data envelopment analysis (3S-DEA) approach to evaluate operational efficiency, while the Malmquist Index is implemented to analyse efficiency and technological change from 2016–17 to 2019–20. Significant differences in the performance of distribution utilities within the same state were observed. Improvements in efficiency scores are observed for the distribution utilities after considering service quality parameters. The findings highlight the importance of considering service quality parameters when evaluating the operational efficiency of distribution utilities. The results obtained from this study will be helpful for policymakers, regulators, and utility management in identifying inefficiency determinants and designing effective strategies to improve operational performance. Furthermore, such periodical benchmarking exercises could be incorporated into the review process by Indian state regulators to better incentivise or penalise utilities based on their performance.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.