Similar carbon accumulation rates with distinct drivers in two temperate forest restoration approaches

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fengfeng Du , Yimian Zhang , Lingyan Zhou , Peter Dietrich , Guiyao Zhou , Jing Wang , Quanzhi Zhang , Xingchang Wang , Zhenggang Du , Xuhui Zhou
{"title":"Similar carbon accumulation rates with distinct drivers in two temperate forest restoration approaches","authors":"Fengfeng Du ,&nbsp;Yimian Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Peter Dietrich ,&nbsp;Guiyao Zhou ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Quanzhi Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingchang Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenggang Du ,&nbsp;Xuhui Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forestation serves as a critical nature-based climate solution, sequestering substantial fractions of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, uncertainties persist regarding the carbon sequestration efficiency of planted (PFs) versus naturally regenerated (NRFs) forests, impacting climate projections. Using a terrestrial ecosystem model framework integrating Bayesian inversion and traceability analysis, we evaluated long-term carbon dynamics in 4 NRFs and 2 PFs after 54 years of reforestation in a temperate forest in Northeast China. Our results showed divergent carbon accumulation rates ranging from 135.1 (Mongolian oak) to 400.3 g C m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (Dahurian larch) during 2015–2100. By 2100, Dahurian larch forests (PFs) exhibited the highest total carbon storage driven by exceptional net primary production (NPP). Hardwood forests (NRFs) ranked second due to prolonged ecosystem carbon residence time. Furthermore, the efficiency of carbon sequestration in PFs correlated strongly with plant traits, especially NPP, as well as the turnover rate of foliage and carbon allocation to wood biomass. By contrast, the carbon sequestration efficiency of NRFs depended primarily on the soil organic carbon residence time, the litter carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio, and soil inorganic nitrogen (N) content. This study highlights the different contributions of plants and soil to carbon storage in PFs and NRFs and advances our understanding of carbon accumulation between PFs and NRFs in the long term under identical climatic conditions. Our findings provide critical insights for designing reforestation strategies to enhance temperate forest carbon sinks in a changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109249"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500551X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forestation serves as a critical nature-based climate solution, sequestering substantial fractions of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. However, uncertainties persist regarding the carbon sequestration efficiency of planted (PFs) versus naturally regenerated (NRFs) forests, impacting climate projections. Using a terrestrial ecosystem model framework integrating Bayesian inversion and traceability analysis, we evaluated long-term carbon dynamics in 4 NRFs and 2 PFs after 54 years of reforestation in a temperate forest in Northeast China. Our results showed divergent carbon accumulation rates ranging from 135.1 (Mongolian oak) to 400.3 g C m−2 year−1 (Dahurian larch) during 2015–2100. By 2100, Dahurian larch forests (PFs) exhibited the highest total carbon storage driven by exceptional net primary production (NPP). Hardwood forests (NRFs) ranked second due to prolonged ecosystem carbon residence time. Furthermore, the efficiency of carbon sequestration in PFs correlated strongly with plant traits, especially NPP, as well as the turnover rate of foliage and carbon allocation to wood biomass. By contrast, the carbon sequestration efficiency of NRFs depended primarily on the soil organic carbon residence time, the litter carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio, and soil inorganic nitrogen (N) content. This study highlights the different contributions of plants and soil to carbon storage in PFs and NRFs and advances our understanding of carbon accumulation between PFs and NRFs in the long term under identical climatic conditions. Our findings provide critical insights for designing reforestation strategies to enhance temperate forest carbon sinks in a changing climate.
两种温带森林恢复方式相似的碳积累速率和不同的驱动因素
植树造林是一种关键的基于自然的气候解决方案,可以隔离大部分人为二氧化碳排放。然而,人工林(PFs)与自然再生林(NRFs)的碳固存效率仍然存在不确定性,这影响了气候预测。基于贝叶斯反演和可追溯性分析相结合的陆地生态系统模型框架,对中国东北温带森林复植54年后4个自然保护区和2个森林保护区的长期碳动态进行了评价。结果表明,2015-2100年期间,蒙古橡树的碳积累速率为135.1 ~ 400.3 g C m−2 year−1(大湖落叶松)。到2100年,在净初级生产量(NPP)的驱动下,大湖落叶松林(PFs)的总碳储量最高。阔叶林的生态系统碳滞留时间较长,排在第二位。此外,森林森林的固碳效率与植物性状,特别是NPP、叶片周转率和木材生物量碳分配密切相关。自然植被篱固碳效率主要受土壤有机碳停留时间、凋落物碳氮比和土壤无机氮含量的影响。本研究强调了植物和土壤对森林保护区和自然保护区碳储量的不同贡献,并进一步加深了我们对相同气候条件下森林保护区和自然保护区长期碳积累的认识。我们的研究结果为在气候变化中设计再造林策略以增强温带森林碳汇提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信