Crafting Compliant Data: Enacting Aggregate Spend Transparency in the US Life Science Industry

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Lindsay Poirier
{"title":"Crafting Compliant Data: Enacting Aggregate Spend Transparency in the US Life Science Industry","authors":"Lindsay Poirier","doi":"10.1002/sea2.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the early 2010s, the passing of US legislation mandating that health care manufacturers publicly disclose their financial relationships with physicians gave rise to the field of aggregate spend. Within corporate compliance offices in the life sciences, aggregate spend professionals track updates to transparency legislation, develop protocols for reporting data on their company's interactions with and payments to health care providers, and monitor data to assess the company's compliance with relevant laws. Drawing on observations of discourse at professional events, I argue that the labor of producing compliant transparency data defies rationalization even as it seeks to abide by laws and regulations. The article extends anthropological theorizing of compliance by showing how aggregate spend professionals carve out certain agencies to comply in strategic ways. It further contributes to the anthropological understanding of labor in the data economy by showing how the work of these data professionals, while undervalued in the organization, invisibilized by the logics of the transparency program, and often presumed to involve routinized labor, in fact involves considerable care and discernment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45372,"journal":{"name":"Economic Anthropology","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sea2.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early 2010s, the passing of US legislation mandating that health care manufacturers publicly disclose their financial relationships with physicians gave rise to the field of aggregate spend. Within corporate compliance offices in the life sciences, aggregate spend professionals track updates to transparency legislation, develop protocols for reporting data on their company's interactions with and payments to health care providers, and monitor data to assess the company's compliance with relevant laws. Drawing on observations of discourse at professional events, I argue that the labor of producing compliant transparency data defies rationalization even as it seeks to abide by laws and regulations. The article extends anthropological theorizing of compliance by showing how aggregate spend professionals carve out certain agencies to comply in strategic ways. It further contributes to the anthropological understanding of labor in the data economy by showing how the work of these data professionals, while undervalued in the organization, invisibilized by the logics of the transparency program, and often presumed to involve routinized labor, in fact involves considerable care and discernment.

制作合规数据:在美国生命科学行业制定总支出透明度
2010年代初,美国通过了一项立法,要求医疗保健制造商公开披露其与医生的财务关系,这导致了医疗总支出领域的增长。在生命科学领域的公司合规办公室内,汇总支出专业人员跟踪透明度立法的更新,制定报告公司与医疗保健提供者的互动和支付数据的协议,并监控数据以评估公司对相关法律的遵守情况。根据对专业活动中话语的观察,我认为,生产合规透明数据的劳动违背了合理化,即使它试图遵守法律法规。这篇文章通过展示总支出专业人员如何以战略方式开辟出某些机构来遵守,扩展了遵守的人类学理论。通过展示这些数据专业人员的工作如何在组织中被低估,被透明度计划的逻辑所忽视,并且通常被认为涉及常规劳动,它进一步有助于对数据经济中劳动的人类学理解,实际上涉及相当多的关怀和洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Anthropology
Economic Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信