Cash bail and pretrial compliance: Evidence from a court‐imposed policy shock

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jennifer E. Copp
{"title":"Cash bail and pretrial compliance: Evidence from a court‐imposed policy shock","authors":"Jennifer E. Copp","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryWe evaluated the impact of an administrative order issued in the early days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic that aimed to reduce the size of the pretrial population in Palm Beach County, FL, by reducing bond amounts for eligible felony offenses. Our findings revealed that the administrative order was successful in reducing the average bond amounts for individuals charged with eligible felonies and that these reductions corresponded to (1) increases in the likelihood of pretrial release and (2) declines in the average custody length. Furthermore, despite these changes to the odds and pace of pretrial release, we found no evidence to suggest that the administrative order negatively affected pretrial compliance, including new criminal activity and failure to appear in court.Policy ImplicationsThe COVID‐19 pandemic set in motion a range of policy changes to mitigate virus spread within correctional facilities, recognizing the vulnerabilities of correctional environments and incarcerated persons. These changes resulted in immediate reductions to jail populations. However, questions quickly emerged regarding their impacts on public safety, among other considerations. The current investigation evaluated the effect of one such COVID‐19 era policy shock on pretrial detention and misconduct. Our findings revealed that reducing bond amounts for individuals charged with eligible felonies contributed to increased rates of pretrial release and reduced detention lengths without jeopardizing either public safety or court efficiency. Consistent with other recent pretrial research, these findings suggest that by reducing our reliance on money bail, we can reduce financial barriers to release among justice‐involved populations, ease inefficiencies in the courts, and save scarce jail resources by scaling back unnecessary pretrial detention. As the pandemic recedes, evaluations of COVID‐19 era policies can help provide a framework for promising criminal justice reforms that reduce our overuse of incarceration and help contribute to a fair and impartial system.","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.70002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryWe evaluated the impact of an administrative order issued in the early days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic that aimed to reduce the size of the pretrial population in Palm Beach County, FL, by reducing bond amounts for eligible felony offenses. Our findings revealed that the administrative order was successful in reducing the average bond amounts for individuals charged with eligible felonies and that these reductions corresponded to (1) increases in the likelihood of pretrial release and (2) declines in the average custody length. Furthermore, despite these changes to the odds and pace of pretrial release, we found no evidence to suggest that the administrative order negatively affected pretrial compliance, including new criminal activity and failure to appear in court.Policy ImplicationsThe COVID‐19 pandemic set in motion a range of policy changes to mitigate virus spread within correctional facilities, recognizing the vulnerabilities of correctional environments and incarcerated persons. These changes resulted in immediate reductions to jail populations. However, questions quickly emerged regarding their impacts on public safety, among other considerations. The current investigation evaluated the effect of one such COVID‐19 era policy shock on pretrial detention and misconduct. Our findings revealed that reducing bond amounts for individuals charged with eligible felonies contributed to increased rates of pretrial release and reduced detention lengths without jeopardizing either public safety or court efficiency. Consistent with other recent pretrial research, these findings suggest that by reducing our reliance on money bail, we can reduce financial barriers to release among justice‐involved populations, ease inefficiencies in the courts, and save scarce jail resources by scaling back unnecessary pretrial detention. As the pandemic recedes, evaluations of COVID‐19 era policies can help provide a framework for promising criminal justice reforms that reduce our overuse of incarceration and help contribute to a fair and impartial system.
现金保释和审前服从:来自法院施加的政策冲击的证据
研究摘要:我们评估了2019年冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行初期发布的一项行政命令的影响,该命令旨在通过减少符合条件的重罪犯罪的保释金来减少佛罗里达州棕榈滩县审前人口的规模。我们的研究结果显示,行政命令成功地减少了被指控犯有符合条件的重罪的个人的平均保释金数额,并且这些减少对应于(1)审前释放可能性的增加和(2)平均拘留时间的减少。此外,尽管审前释放的几率和速度发生了这些变化,但我们没有发现证据表明行政命令对审前合规产生了负面影响,包括新的犯罪活动和未能出庭。政策影响新冠肺炎疫情引发了一系列政策变化,以减轻病毒在惩教设施内的传播,同时认识到惩教环境和在押人员的脆弱性。这些变化导致监狱人口立即减少。然而,关于它们对公共安全的影响等问题迅速浮出水面。目前的调查评估了一次这样的COVID - 19时代政策冲击对审前拘留和不当行为的影响。我们的研究结果显示,减少被指控犯有重罪的个人的保释金数额有助于提高审前释放率,缩短拘留时间,而不会危及公共安全或法庭效率。与最近的其他审前研究一致,这些研究结果表明,通过减少对保释金的依赖,我们可以减少司法相关人群释放的经济障碍,缓解法院的低效率,并通过减少不必要的审前拘留来节省稀缺的监狱资源。随着疫情的消退,对COVID - 19时代政策的评估有助于为有希望的刑事司法改革提供框架,减少我们过度使用监禁,并有助于建立公平和公正的制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信