“It’s very well written!”: Revisiting praise in teacher written feedback from the perspective of feedback literacy

IF 3.6 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Shulin Yu, Peisha Wu, Chenggang Liang
{"title":"“It’s very well written!”: Revisiting praise in teacher written feedback from the perspective of feedback literacy","authors":"Shulin Yu, Peisha Wu, Chenggang Liang","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informed by the conceptual framework of teacher feedback literacy and drawing upon multiple sources of data, including teacher feedback samples, semi-structured interviews, and stimulated recalls, this case study examined how L2 writing teachers praise students in written feedback and their feedback literacy in giving praise in a Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) university context. The findings revealed that although praise was commonly used, suggestion and criticism still accounted for a larger percentage of all feedback given. The teachers favored independent praise and performance-oriented praise (i.e. text quality) over concomitant praise, effort-oriented, and ability-oriented praise, and praise was found to facilitate teacher-student dialogic feedback and encourage student autonomy and reciprocity in engaging with teacher feedback. The study identified two profiles of praise-giving practice: “active praise givers,” who communicated with student writers by providing feedback, and “sparse praise givers,” who focused more on working on student texts. Based on the findings, an L2 writing teacher feedback literacy framework in written praise was proposed to delineate the required knowledge, goals, values, and skills for giving written praise to improve student writing.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informed by the conceptual framework of teacher feedback literacy and drawing upon multiple sources of data, including teacher feedback samples, semi-structured interviews, and stimulated recalls, this case study examined how L2 writing teachers praise students in written feedback and their feedback literacy in giving praise in a Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) university context. The findings revealed that although praise was commonly used, suggestion and criticism still accounted for a larger percentage of all feedback given. The teachers favored independent praise and performance-oriented praise (i.e. text quality) over concomitant praise, effort-oriented, and ability-oriented praise, and praise was found to facilitate teacher-student dialogic feedback and encourage student autonomy and reciprocity in engaging with teacher feedback. The study identified two profiles of praise-giving practice: “active praise givers,” who communicated with student writers by providing feedback, and “sparse praise givers,” who focused more on working on student texts. Based on the findings, an L2 writing teacher feedback literacy framework in written praise was proposed to delineate the required knowledge, goals, values, and skills for giving written praise to improve student writing.
“写得很好!”:从反馈素养的视角重新审视教师书面反馈中的表扬
根据教师反馈素养的概念框架,并利用多种数据来源,包括教师反馈样本、半结构化访谈和刺激回忆,本案例研究考察了第二语言写作教师如何在书面反馈中表扬学生,以及他们在中国大学英语作为外语(EFL)背景下表扬学生的反馈素养。调查结果显示,虽然表扬是常用的,但建议和批评在所有反馈中所占的比例仍然较大。教师更喜欢独立的表扬和以表现为导向的表扬(即文本质量),而不是伴随着的表扬、以努力为导向的表扬和以能力为导向的表扬,并且发现表扬有助于师生对话反馈,鼓励学生在参与教师反馈时的自主性和互惠性。该研究确定了两种表扬行为:“主动表扬者”,他们通过提供反馈与学生作家交流;“稀疏表扬者”,他们更专注于学生的文章。基于这些发现,我们提出了一个书面表扬中的第二语言写作教师反馈素养框架,以描述给予书面表扬以提高学生写作所需的知识、目标、价值观和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信