Neurological and psychiatric aspects of long COVID among vaccinated healthcare workers: An assessment of prevalence and reporting biases.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Yi-Chun Chen, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Chih-Jung Chen
{"title":"Neurological and psychiatric aspects of long COVID among vaccinated healthcare workers: An assessment of prevalence and reporting biases.","authors":"Yi-Chun Chen, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Chih-Jung Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the prevalence and severity of neurological and psychiatric long COVID symptoms among healthcare workers (HCWs) based on their COVID-19 status, aiming to unravel the complexities associated with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 467 HCWs from a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, who received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccines, were surveyed for long COVID symptoms. Participants were categorized into symptomatic (n = 224), asymptomatic (n = 21), and absence of COVID-19 (n = 222) groups based on diagnostic criteria involving questionnaire responses, medical records, and anti-nucleoprotein antibody data. Through a comprehensive set of questionnaires, symptoms, memory dysfunction, anxiety, and depression were rigorously evaluated and statistically analyzed for group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite meticulous data collection, the study revealed no statistically significant differences in the severity of neurological and psychiatric long COVID symptoms across the COVID-19 status groups. Noteworthy trends were observed, including higher instances of memory problems worsening over time, elevated anxiety levels in symptomatic cases, and subtle indicators of increased depression severity in this subgroup. The findings underscored the multifactorial nature of long COVID manifestations and the impact of COVID-19 history on reported symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted potential biases in symptom reporting that may inflate long COVID prevalence estimates. While the robust methodology shed light on diverse health profiles among HCWs, future research should focus on longitudinal designs and objective diagnostic measures to provide more accurate assessments of long COVID's burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.06.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the prevalence and severity of neurological and psychiatric long COVID symptoms among healthcare workers (HCWs) based on their COVID-19 status, aiming to unravel the complexities associated with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: A cohort of 467 HCWs from a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, who received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccines, were surveyed for long COVID symptoms. Participants were categorized into symptomatic (n = 224), asymptomatic (n = 21), and absence of COVID-19 (n = 222) groups based on diagnostic criteria involving questionnaire responses, medical records, and anti-nucleoprotein antibody data. Through a comprehensive set of questionnaires, symptoms, memory dysfunction, anxiety, and depression were rigorously evaluated and statistically analyzed for group comparisons.

Results: Despite meticulous data collection, the study revealed no statistically significant differences in the severity of neurological and psychiatric long COVID symptoms across the COVID-19 status groups. Noteworthy trends were observed, including higher instances of memory problems worsening over time, elevated anxiety levels in symptomatic cases, and subtle indicators of increased depression severity in this subgroup. The findings underscored the multifactorial nature of long COVID manifestations and the impact of COVID-19 history on reported symptoms.

Conclusion: The study highlighted potential biases in symptom reporting that may inflate long COVID prevalence estimates. While the robust methodology shed light on diverse health profiles among HCWs, future research should focus on longitudinal designs and objective diagnostic measures to provide more accurate assessments of long COVID's burden.

接种疫苗的医护人员长期COVID的神经和精神方面:对患病率和报告偏差的评估
背景:本研究评估了医护人员(HCWs)基于其COVID-19状态的神经和精神长期COVID症状的患病率和严重程度,旨在揭示SARS-CoV-2感染急性后后遗症的复杂性。方法:选取台湾北部某教学医院467名接种过3剂以上新冠肺炎疫苗的医护人员,调查其长期症状。根据包括问卷回答、医疗记录和抗核蛋白抗体数据在内的诊断标准,将参与者分为有症状(n = 224)、无症状(n = 21)和无COVID-19 (n = 222)组。通过一套全面的问卷调查,对症状、记忆功能障碍、焦虑和抑郁进行了严格的评估和统计分析,以进行组间比较。结果:尽管收集了细致的数据,但该研究显示,在COVID-19状态组中,神经和精神长期COVID症状的严重程度没有统计学差异。观察到值得注意的趋势,包括记忆问题随着时间的推移而恶化,有症状病例的焦虑水平升高,以及该亚组抑郁严重程度增加的微妙指标。研究结果强调了COVID-19长期表现的多因素性质以及COVID-19病史对报告症状的影响。结论:该研究强调了症状报告中的潜在偏差,这些偏差可能会夸大长期的COVID流行率估计。虽然稳健的方法揭示了卫生保健工作者的不同健康状况,但未来的研究应侧重于纵向设计和客观诊断措施,以提供对长期COVID负担的更准确评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信