Harjit Kaur Khera, Vivienne Mak, Daniel Thomas Malone
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a virtual privilege walk activity.","authors":"Harjit Kaur Khera, Vivienne Mak, Daniel Thomas Malone","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Privilege walks can encourage self-reflection about privilege, but may cause discomfort amongst participants as they observe disparities between one another.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of a teaching activity that included an anonymous virtual privilege walk, in order to encourage students to reflect on privilege as a concept in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 privilege walk statements were as developed and built into a virtual privilege walk to allow students to confidentially see their results compared to the whole cohort. The virtual privilege walk and a reflective activity was undertaken by first year pharmacy students, while before, immediately after and 9 months later, students completed a 16-item inclusiveness and oppression survey. This survey was designed to measure four factors: 1. Confidence in knowledge and understanding of inclusiveness, 2. Awareness of inclusiveness and oppression, 3. Opinions on pharmacy counselling and congruence between pharmacist and client, and 4. Opinions on pharmacists' roles in promotion and support of inclusiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing paired data pre and post teaching activity, there was a significant increase in factors 1, 2 and 4, but a decrease in factor 3 post-activity compared with pre-activity. Data from students that completed the survey again 9 months after the activity revealed an increased in factor 1, no change in factors 2 and 4, and a decrease in factor 3.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Confidence in knowledge and understanding of, awareness of and opinions on pharmacists' role in the support of inclusiveness were all improved after students undertook and reflected on the privilege walk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Privilege walks can encourage self-reflection about privilege, but may cause discomfort amongst participants as they observe disparities between one another.
Aims: To evaluate the usefulness of a teaching activity that included an anonymous virtual privilege walk, in order to encourage students to reflect on privilege as a concept in healthcare.
Methods: 30 privilege walk statements were as developed and built into a virtual privilege walk to allow students to confidentially see their results compared to the whole cohort. The virtual privilege walk and a reflective activity was undertaken by first year pharmacy students, while before, immediately after and 9 months later, students completed a 16-item inclusiveness and oppression survey. This survey was designed to measure four factors: 1. Confidence in knowledge and understanding of inclusiveness, 2. Awareness of inclusiveness and oppression, 3. Opinions on pharmacy counselling and congruence between pharmacist and client, and 4. Opinions on pharmacists' roles in promotion and support of inclusiveness.
Results: When comparing paired data pre and post teaching activity, there was a significant increase in factors 1, 2 and 4, but a decrease in factor 3 post-activity compared with pre-activity. Data from students that completed the survey again 9 months after the activity revealed an increased in factor 1, no change in factors 2 and 4, and a decrease in factor 3.
Discussion: Confidence in knowledge and understanding of, awareness of and opinions on pharmacists' role in the support of inclusiveness were all improved after students undertook and reflected on the privilege walk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.