Development and evaluation of a virtual privilege walk activity.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Harjit Kaur Khera, Vivienne Mak, Daniel Thomas Malone
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a virtual privilege walk activity.","authors":"Harjit Kaur Khera, Vivienne Mak, Daniel Thomas Malone","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Privilege walks can encourage self-reflection about privilege, but may cause discomfort amongst participants as they observe disparities between one another.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the usefulness of a teaching activity that included an anonymous virtual privilege walk, in order to encourage students to reflect on privilege as a concept in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 privilege walk statements were as developed and built into a virtual privilege walk to allow students to confidentially see their results compared to the whole cohort. The virtual privilege walk and a reflective activity was undertaken by first year pharmacy students, while before, immediately after and 9 months later, students completed a 16-item inclusiveness and oppression survey. This survey was designed to measure four factors: 1. Confidence in knowledge and understanding of inclusiveness, 2. Awareness of inclusiveness and oppression, 3. Opinions on pharmacy counselling and congruence between pharmacist and client, and 4. Opinions on pharmacists' roles in promotion and support of inclusiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing paired data pre and post teaching activity, there was a significant increase in factors 1, 2 and 4, but a decrease in factor 3 post-activity compared with pre-activity. Data from students that completed the survey again 9 months after the activity revealed an increased in factor 1, no change in factors 2 and 4, and a decrease in factor 3.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Confidence in knowledge and understanding of, awareness of and opinions on pharmacists' role in the support of inclusiveness were all improved after students undertook and reflected on the privilege walk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Privilege walks can encourage self-reflection about privilege, but may cause discomfort amongst participants as they observe disparities between one another.

Aims: To evaluate the usefulness of a teaching activity that included an anonymous virtual privilege walk, in order to encourage students to reflect on privilege as a concept in healthcare.

Methods: 30 privilege walk statements were as developed and built into a virtual privilege walk to allow students to confidentially see their results compared to the whole cohort. The virtual privilege walk and a reflective activity was undertaken by first year pharmacy students, while before, immediately after and 9 months later, students completed a 16-item inclusiveness and oppression survey. This survey was designed to measure four factors: 1. Confidence in knowledge and understanding of inclusiveness, 2. Awareness of inclusiveness and oppression, 3. Opinions on pharmacy counselling and congruence between pharmacist and client, and 4. Opinions on pharmacists' roles in promotion and support of inclusiveness.

Results: When comparing paired data pre and post teaching activity, there was a significant increase in factors 1, 2 and 4, but a decrease in factor 3 post-activity compared with pre-activity. Data from students that completed the survey again 9 months after the activity revealed an increased in factor 1, no change in factors 2 and 4, and a decrease in factor 3.

Discussion: Confidence in knowledge and understanding of, awareness of and opinions on pharmacists' role in the support of inclusiveness were all improved after students undertook and reflected on the privilege walk.

虚拟特权行走活动的开发与评估。
简介:特权散步可以鼓励对特权的自我反思,但可能会引起参与者的不适,因为他们观察到彼此之间的差异。目的:评估包含匿名虚拟特权行走的教学活动的有用性,以鼓励学生反思特权在医疗保健中的概念。方法:开发了30条特权行走语句,并将其构建为虚拟特权行走,以允许学生秘密地查看与整个队列比较的结果。虚拟特权行走和反思活动由药学一年级学生进行,而在此之前、之后和9个月后,学生们完成了16项包容性和压迫调查。本调查旨在衡量四个因素:1。2、对知识的信心和对包容的理解;2 .包容与压迫意识;3 .对药学咨询与医患一致性的看法;浅谈药师在促进和支持包容性中的作用。结果:对比教学活动前后的配对数据,活动后因子1、2、4较活动前显著升高,而活动后因子3较活动前降低。在活动结束9个月后再次完成调查的学生的数据显示,因素1有所增加,因素2和4没有变化,因素3有所下降。讨论:通过对特权行走的承担和反思,学生对药剂师在包容性支持中的作用的认识和理解的信心、认识和意见都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信