Comparison of isolated eccentric exercise and eccentric exercise combined with shock wave therapy in non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Gokhan Pehlivanoglu, Canan Gonen Aydin, Kadir Ilker Yildiz, Kutalmis Albayrak, Muhammed Bilal Kurk, Baris Ozkul
{"title":"Comparison of isolated eccentric exercise and eccentric exercise combined with shock wave therapy in non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.","authors":"Gokhan Pehlivanoglu, Canan Gonen Aydin, Kadir Ilker Yildiz, Kutalmis Albayrak, Muhammed Bilal Kurk, Baris Ozkul","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of eccentric exercise (EE) alone versus combined treatment with EE and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for treating noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy. Seventy-eight patients who underwent treatment with EE alone or combined with ESWT were retrospectively evaluated. Results were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, at the third-month, and after an average follow-up period of 6.3 years. The VAS and Likert scale scores were significantly better after treatment and at the third-month follow-up for those who underwent combined treatment (p < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores compared to baseline levels after treatment, in the third-month, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The final follow-up results revealed no significant differences between the VISA-A, VAS, and Likert scores of both groups. Fifty-six out of 78 patients (71.8%) who rated themselves as Likert 1 (fully healed) or 2 (much better) on the 6-point Likert scale were deemed successful. While both treatment groups reached minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in VAS scores, the intergroup MCID was not clinically significant. This study underscores the efficacy of EE in noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, and the clinical effect of ESWT remains controversial. However, ESWT+EE combination therapy may be a viable option for specific patient groups requiring rapid recovery, such as athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of eccentric exercise (EE) alone versus combined treatment with EE and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for treating noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy. Seventy-eight patients who underwent treatment with EE alone or combined with ESWT were retrospectively evaluated. Results were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, at the third-month, and after an average follow-up period of 6.3 years. The VAS and Likert scale scores were significantly better after treatment and at the third-month follow-up for those who underwent combined treatment (p < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores compared to baseline levels after treatment, in the third-month, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The final follow-up results revealed no significant differences between the VISA-A, VAS, and Likert scores of both groups. Fifty-six out of 78 patients (71.8%) who rated themselves as Likert 1 (fully healed) or 2 (much better) on the 6-point Likert scale were deemed successful. While both treatment groups reached minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in VAS scores, the intergroup MCID was not clinically significant. This study underscores the efficacy of EE in noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, and the clinical effect of ESWT remains controversial. However, ESWT+EE combination therapy may be a viable option for specific patient groups requiring rapid recovery, such as athletes.

孤立偏心运动与偏心运动联合冲击波治疗非插入性跟腱病的比较。
本研究旨在比较偏心运动(EE)单独与联合EE和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)治疗非插入性跟腱病的有效性。78例接受EE单独或联合ESWT治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估。比较两组患者治疗前后、治疗第3个月及平均随访6.3年的结果。治疗后和随访第3个月时,联合治疗组VAS和Likert评分均显著提高(p < 0.05)。两组患者在治疗后、第3个月和最后随访时的VISA-A和VAS评分均较基线水平有统计学显著改善(p < 0.05)。最终随访结果显示,两组患者的VISA-A、VAS和Likert评分无显著差异。78名患者中有56名(71.8%)将自己评定为6分李克特1级(完全治愈)或2级(好得多),他们被认为是成功的。虽然两个治疗组的VAS评分均达到最小临床重要差异(MCID),但组间的MCID无临床意义。本研究强调了EE在非插入性跟腱病变中的疗效,而ESWT的临床效果仍存在争议。然而,对于需要快速恢复的特定患者群体,如运动员,ESWT+EE联合治疗可能是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信