Gokhan Pehlivanoglu, Canan Gonen Aydin, Kadir Ilker Yildiz, Kutalmis Albayrak, Muhammed Bilal Kurk, Baris Ozkul
{"title":"Comparison of isolated eccentric exercise and eccentric exercise combined with shock wave therapy in non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.","authors":"Gokhan Pehlivanoglu, Canan Gonen Aydin, Kadir Ilker Yildiz, Kutalmis Albayrak, Muhammed Bilal Kurk, Baris Ozkul","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of eccentric exercise (EE) alone versus combined treatment with EE and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for treating noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy. Seventy-eight patients who underwent treatment with EE alone or combined with ESWT were retrospectively evaluated. Results were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, at the third-month, and after an average follow-up period of 6.3 years. The VAS and Likert scale scores were significantly better after treatment and at the third-month follow-up for those who underwent combined treatment (p < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores compared to baseline levels after treatment, in the third-month, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The final follow-up results revealed no significant differences between the VISA-A, VAS, and Likert scores of both groups. Fifty-six out of 78 patients (71.8%) who rated themselves as Likert 1 (fully healed) or 2 (much better) on the 6-point Likert scale were deemed successful. While both treatment groups reached minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in VAS scores, the intergroup MCID was not clinically significant. This study underscores the efficacy of EE in noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, and the clinical effect of ESWT remains controversial. However, ESWT+EE combination therapy may be a viable option for specific patient groups requiring rapid recovery, such as athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of eccentric exercise (EE) alone versus combined treatment with EE and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for treating noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy. Seventy-eight patients who underwent treatment with EE alone or combined with ESWT were retrospectively evaluated. Results were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, at the third-month, and after an average follow-up period of 6.3 years. The VAS and Likert scale scores were significantly better after treatment and at the third-month follow-up for those who underwent combined treatment (p < 0.05). Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores compared to baseline levels after treatment, in the third-month, and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The final follow-up results revealed no significant differences between the VISA-A, VAS, and Likert scores of both groups. Fifty-six out of 78 patients (71.8%) who rated themselves as Likert 1 (fully healed) or 2 (much better) on the 6-point Likert scale were deemed successful. While both treatment groups reached minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in VAS scores, the intergroup MCID was not clinically significant. This study underscores the efficacy of EE in noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, and the clinical effect of ESWT remains controversial. However, ESWT+EE combination therapy may be a viable option for specific patient groups requiring rapid recovery, such as athletes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.