Disability in Undergraduate Medical Education in the United States: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lauren A Maggio, Kirsten R Brown, Joseph A Costello, Aaron Konopasky, Dionna Bidny, Abigail Konopasky
{"title":"Disability in Undergraduate Medical Education in the United States: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Lauren A Maggio, Kirsten R Brown, Joseph A Costello, Aaron Konopasky, Dionna Bidny, Abigail Konopasky","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Students with disabilities remain disproportionately underrepresented in undergraduate medical education (UME). This scoping review synthesizes the literature on undergraduate medical students with disabilities in the United States to identify the purpose of the literature and map how disability is portrayed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors searched 8 databases for relevant publications published between January 2008 through August 2024. Publication inclusion was determined using a two-phase title/abstract screening process and full-text review conducted by two independent authors. Data extraction focused on characterizing the publication, followed by an analysis of the publications' goals and how disability was portrayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 10,491 publications; 81 were included, most of which were journal articles (n = 78). In 23 publications, at least one author identified as disabled. Five main goals were identified in the publication purpose statements, including describing (n = 50), calling for action, evaluating, arguing, and creating. Overall, disability was portrayed as (1) diversity, (2) deficiency, (3) inherently connected with accommodation and technical standards, and (4) a place of habitual omissions. Two studies discussed disability in relation to intersectional identities, and two used gender or race in multivariable models. No studies explicitly focused on UME and disabled students of color, disability and gender diversity, or disabled LGBQ+ students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review identified that disability is portrayed from an abled viewpoint as race and gender-neutral, static, and as diversity, deficit, or a legal construct. Future researchers should consider how disability is conceptualized and the use of intersectional frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Students with disabilities remain disproportionately underrepresented in undergraduate medical education (UME). This scoping review synthesizes the literature on undergraduate medical students with disabilities in the United States to identify the purpose of the literature and map how disability is portrayed.

Method: The authors searched 8 databases for relevant publications published between January 2008 through August 2024. Publication inclusion was determined using a two-phase title/abstract screening process and full-text review conducted by two independent authors. Data extraction focused on characterizing the publication, followed by an analysis of the publications' goals and how disability was portrayed.

Results: The authors identified 10,491 publications; 81 were included, most of which were journal articles (n = 78). In 23 publications, at least one author identified as disabled. Five main goals were identified in the publication purpose statements, including describing (n = 50), calling for action, evaluating, arguing, and creating. Overall, disability was portrayed as (1) diversity, (2) deficiency, (3) inherently connected with accommodation and technical standards, and (4) a place of habitual omissions. Two studies discussed disability in relation to intersectional identities, and two used gender or race in multivariable models. No studies explicitly focused on UME and disabled students of color, disability and gender diversity, or disabled LGBQ+ students.

Conclusions: This scoping review identified that disability is portrayed from an abled viewpoint as race and gender-neutral, static, and as diversity, deficit, or a legal construct. Future researchers should consider how disability is conceptualized and the use of intersectional frameworks.

美国本科医学教育中的残疾:范围审查。
目的:残疾学生在本科医学教育(UME)中仍然不成比例地代表性不足。这一范围审查综合了关于美国残疾本科医学生的文献,以确定文献的目的,并绘制了如何描述残疾的地图。方法:检索2008年1月至2024年8月期间发表的相关文献。通过两阶段的标题/摘要筛选过程和由两位独立作者进行的全文审查来确定出版物的纳入。数据提取的重点是描述出版物的特征,然后分析出版物的目标以及如何描述残疾。结果:作者共发现10491篇出版物;共纳入81篇,其中大部分为期刊文章(n = 78)。在23份出版物中,至少有一名作者被认定为残疾人。在发表目的声明中确定了五个主要目标,包括描述(n = 50)、呼吁行动、评估、争论和创造。总的来说,残疾被描述为:(1)多样性;(2)缺陷;(3)与住宿和技术标准内在联系;(4)习惯性遗漏的地方。两项研究讨论了残疾与交叉身份的关系,两项研究在多变量模型中使用了性别或种族。没有研究明确关注UME和残疾学生的肤色,残疾和性别多样性,或残疾LGBQ+学生。结论:这一范围综述发现,从残疾人的角度来看,残疾被描述为种族和性别中立、静态、多样性、缺陷或法律结构。未来的研究人员应该考虑残疾是如何概念化的,以及交叉框架的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信