Patient-Provider Communication among U.S. Adults with Food Insecurity.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sungchul Park, Seth A Berkowitz
{"title":"Patient-Provider Communication among U.S. Adults with Food Insecurity.","authors":"Sungchul Park, Seth A Berkowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Food-insecure adults may experience poor patient-provider communication, potentially compromising care delivery, but this remains unclear. This study examined whether food-insecure adults face poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults and how this interplay affects access to care, health care utilization, and financial burden of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the 2016, 2017, and 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes included patient-provider communication, access to care, health care utilization, and financial burden of care. Key independent variables were patient-provider communication and food insecurity. Analysis was conducted in September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food-insecure adults reported poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults, with 9.0% (95% CI: 7.7-10.3) and 56.0% (53.9-58.2) in reporting low and moderate communication among food-insecure adults vs. 4.3% (4.1-4.6) and 50.7% (50.0-51.4) in reporting low and moderate communication among food-secure adults. Furthermore, food insecurity was associated with lower access to care, higher emergency departments visits, and greater financial burdens, particularly among adults with low communication. Among adults with low communication, the likelihood of having a usual source of care was lower for food-insecure adults than food-secure adults: 69.9% (61.3-78.6) vs. 84.2% (79.8-88.6). Among adults with low communication, food-insecure adults had higher rates of emergency department visits (40.2% [34.5-45.8] vs. 20.1% [17.6-22.6]) and reported experiencing problems paying medical bills (43.7% [37.6-49.8] vs. 20.1% [17.6-22.6]) than food-secure adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underscore the complex health care needs of food-insecure populations and highlight the need to enhance communication strategies to effectively address these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107958"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Food-insecure adults may experience poor patient-provider communication, potentially compromising care delivery, but this remains unclear. This study examined whether food-insecure adults face poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults and how this interplay affects access to care, health care utilization, and financial burden of care.

Methods: This study used data from the 2016, 2017, and 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes included patient-provider communication, access to care, health care utilization, and financial burden of care. Key independent variables were patient-provider communication and food insecurity. Analysis was conducted in September 2024.

Results: Food-insecure adults reported poorer patient-provider communication than food-secure adults, with 9.0% (95% CI: 7.7-10.3) and 56.0% (53.9-58.2) in reporting low and moderate communication among food-insecure adults vs. 4.3% (4.1-4.6) and 50.7% (50.0-51.4) in reporting low and moderate communication among food-secure adults. Furthermore, food insecurity was associated with lower access to care, higher emergency departments visits, and greater financial burdens, particularly among adults with low communication. Among adults with low communication, the likelihood of having a usual source of care was lower for food-insecure adults than food-secure adults: 69.9% (61.3-78.6) vs. 84.2% (79.8-88.6). Among adults with low communication, food-insecure adults had higher rates of emergency department visits (40.2% [34.5-45.8] vs. 20.1% [17.6-22.6]) and reported experiencing problems paying medical bills (43.7% [37.6-49.8] vs. 20.1% [17.6-22.6]) than food-secure adults.

Conclusions: These results underscore the complex health care needs of food-insecure populations and highlight the need to enhance communication strategies to effectively address these challenges.

食品不安全的美国成年人的医患沟通。
粮食不安全的成年人可能会经历医患沟通不佳的情况,这可能会影响医疗服务的提供,但目前尚不清楚。本研究调查了食物不安全的成年人是否比食物安全的成年人面临更差的医患沟通,以及这种相互作用如何影响获得医疗服务、医疗保健利用和医疗保健的经济负担。方法:本研究使用了2016年、2017年和2021年医疗支出小组调查的数据。结果包括患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通、获得医疗服务的机会、医疗服务的利用和医疗服务的经济负担。关键的独立变量是医患沟通和粮食不安全。分析于2024年9月进行。结果:与食物安全的成年人相比,食物不安全的成年人报告的患者与提供者之间的沟通更差,9.0% (95% CI: 7.7-10.3)和56.0%(53.9-58.2)报告食物不安全的成年人之间的低沟通和中度沟通,而4.3%(4.1-4.6)和50.7%(50.0-51.4)报告食物安全的成年人之间的低沟通和中度沟通。此外,粮食不安全与较低的护理机会、较高的急诊就诊率和更大的经济负担有关,特别是在缺乏沟通的成年人中。在缺乏沟通的成年人中,食物不安全的成年人拥有常规护理来源的可能性低于食物有保障的成年人:69.9%(61.3-78.6)对84.2%(79.8-88.6)。在缺乏沟通的成年人中,食物不安全的成年人急诊科就诊率(40.2%[34.5-45.8]对20.1%[17.6-22.6])高于食物安全的成年人,并且报告在支付医疗费用方面遇到问题(43.7%[37.6-49.8]对20.1%[17.6-22.6])。结论:这些结果强调了粮食不安全人口复杂的卫生保健需求,并强调了加强沟通战略以有效应对这些挑战的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信