Retrieving the lost needle during abdominal and pelvic minimally invasive surgeries: a literature review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ali Faegh, Fatemeh Chinisaz, Ghazaleh Baghaei-Shiva, Fatemeh Nafarzadeh, Behnam Shakiba, Ameneh Haghgoo, Robab Maghsoudi
{"title":"Retrieving the lost needle during abdominal and pelvic minimally invasive surgeries: a literature review.","authors":"Ali Faegh, Fatemeh Chinisaz, Ghazaleh Baghaei-Shiva, Fatemeh Nafarzadeh, Behnam Shakiba, Ameneh Haghgoo, Robab Maghsoudi","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02463-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Losing a surgical instrument during a minimally invasive procedure is uncommon but critical, with an estimated incidence of 0.06% to 0.11%. Needle loss can be challenging even for expert surgeons and increases the operation time considerably. The present study focused on successful retrieval techniques for lost needles during laparoscopic and robot-assisted abdominal and pelvic surgeries by reviewing the reported cases in the literature. We aimed to identify information, such as time for needle loss, successful and failed attempts for needle-retrieval, imaging modalities to identify the lost needle, and using special instruments or techniques. The needle withdrawing from the surgical port is the most commonly reported time for needle loss; however, needle loss can occur during needle introduction and suturing. After losing a needle, the camera's first attempt at intra-operative exploration of the surgical field is usually unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the intra-operative X-ray is the most commonly used modality in locating the lost needle successfully. Data suggests that surgical instruments, including ports, are considerable locations for finding the lost needle, which makes port disassembly and visualization one of the principal aspects of needle-retrieval. Some studies report specific instruments for needle-retrieval, including magnets, micro-laparoscopes, semi-rigid hysteroscopes, and needle holders, which may be helpful in exceptional cases. Future studies should compare different methods for needle-retrieval in a considerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02463-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Losing a surgical instrument during a minimally invasive procedure is uncommon but critical, with an estimated incidence of 0.06% to 0.11%. Needle loss can be challenging even for expert surgeons and increases the operation time considerably. The present study focused on successful retrieval techniques for lost needles during laparoscopic and robot-assisted abdominal and pelvic surgeries by reviewing the reported cases in the literature. We aimed to identify information, such as time for needle loss, successful and failed attempts for needle-retrieval, imaging modalities to identify the lost needle, and using special instruments or techniques. The needle withdrawing from the surgical port is the most commonly reported time for needle loss; however, needle loss can occur during needle introduction and suturing. After losing a needle, the camera's first attempt at intra-operative exploration of the surgical field is usually unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the intra-operative X-ray is the most commonly used modality in locating the lost needle successfully. Data suggests that surgical instruments, including ports, are considerable locations for finding the lost needle, which makes port disassembly and visualization one of the principal aspects of needle-retrieval. Some studies report specific instruments for needle-retrieval, including magnets, micro-laparoscopes, semi-rigid hysteroscopes, and needle holders, which may be helpful in exceptional cases. Future studies should compare different methods for needle-retrieval in a considerable population.

在腹部和骨盆微创手术中找回丢失的针:文献综述。
在微创手术过程中丢失手术器械并不常见,但很重要,估计发生率为0.06%至0.11%。即使对于专业的外科医生来说,针头丢失也是一个挑战,并且大大增加了手术时间。本研究通过回顾文献中报道的病例,重点研究腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹部和骨盆手术中丢失针头的成功回收技术。我们的目的是识别信息,如针头丢失的时间,成功和失败的针头回收尝试,识别丢失的针头的成像方式,以及使用特殊的仪器或技术。针头从手术口拔出是最常报道的针头丢失时间;然而,在针头导入和缝合过程中可能会发生针头丢失。在失去一根针头后,相机在术中对手术野的第一次探索通常是不成功的。然而,术中x线是成功定位丢失针头最常用的方式。数据表明,包括端口在内的手术器械是寻找丢失针头的重要位置,这使得端口拆卸和可视化成为针头回收的主要方面之一。一些研究报告了用于取针的特定器械,包括磁铁、微型腹腔镜、半刚性宫腔镜和针架,这在特殊情况下可能会有所帮助。未来的研究应该在相当大的人群中比较不同的取针方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信