"It's me who supports. How are you going to refuse to have a child?": the social norms and gender dynamics of men's engagement in family planning practices in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Salomine Ekambi, Kathryn Sugg, Florence Mpata, Dédé Marachto Aliango, Peter J Winch
{"title":"\"It's me who supports. How are you going to refuse to have a child?\": the social norms and gender dynamics of men's engagement in family planning practices in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.","authors":"Salomine Ekambi, Kathryn Sugg, Florence Mpata, Dédé Marachto Aliango, Peter J Winch","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-02029-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a disparity exists in the fertility desires of men and women, with men often expressing a desire for more children than their partners. This disconnect can be attributed to social and gender norms that influence discussions and decision-making regarding birth spacing, birth limiting, and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods. This qualitative study, through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, explored the social norms shaping perceptions, attitudes, and decision-making around family planning among men in the DRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was adapted from the 5-step process set forth in the Social Norms Exploration Tool (SNET). Data collection took place in the three provinces of Kasai Central, Lualaba, and Sankuru. This process was divided into three phases: a reference-group identification phase incorporating a short, quantitative questionnaire, an exploration of norms and attitudes with the population of interest (N = 317) - here married and unmarried men - and further exploration of social norms among the reference groups (N = 144) cited by men.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social norms around family planning are contradictory and can be better understood by breaking down the concept of family planning into three categories of descriptive and injunctive norms: 1) the use of modern contraceptive methods, 2) birth spacing and family size, and 3) couple communication and decision-making. We found that while social norms oppose the use of modern contraceptive methods and advocate for larger family size, there is notable social support for birth spacing. Some men reported they would support their wives in learning about contraceptive methods if they were able to make the final decision. However, other men felt that allowing their wives to seek a method would undermine their authority or their virility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase modern contraceptive uptake, interventions should address the underlying issues that contribute to non-adherence, addressing the three categories and their associated norms individually and engaging reference groups important to each, including healthcare providers, religious leaders, and male peer groups, in family planning programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02029-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a disparity exists in the fertility desires of men and women, with men often expressing a desire for more children than their partners. This disconnect can be attributed to social and gender norms that influence discussions and decision-making regarding birth spacing, birth limiting, and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods. This qualitative study, through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, explored the social norms shaping perceptions, attitudes, and decision-making around family planning among men in the DRC.

Methods: The study protocol was adapted from the 5-step process set forth in the Social Norms Exploration Tool (SNET). Data collection took place in the three provinces of Kasai Central, Lualaba, and Sankuru. This process was divided into three phases: a reference-group identification phase incorporating a short, quantitative questionnaire, an exploration of norms and attitudes with the population of interest (N = 317) - here married and unmarried men - and further exploration of social norms among the reference groups (N = 144) cited by men.

Results: Social norms around family planning are contradictory and can be better understood by breaking down the concept of family planning into three categories of descriptive and injunctive norms: 1) the use of modern contraceptive methods, 2) birth spacing and family size, and 3) couple communication and decision-making. We found that while social norms oppose the use of modern contraceptive methods and advocate for larger family size, there is notable social support for birth spacing. Some men reported they would support their wives in learning about contraceptive methods if they were able to make the final decision. However, other men felt that allowing their wives to seek a method would undermine their authority or their virility.

Conclusions: To increase modern contraceptive uptake, interventions should address the underlying issues that contribute to non-adherence, addressing the three categories and their associated norms individually and engaging reference groups important to each, including healthcare providers, religious leaders, and male peer groups, in family planning programming.

Abstract Image

“支持他的是我。你怎么能拒绝要孩子呢?“:刚果民主共和国男子参与计划生育实践的社会规范和性别动态。
背景:在刚果民主共和国(DRC),男性和女性的生育愿望存在差异,男性通常比其伴侣表达更多孩子的愿望。这种脱节可归因于影响有关生育间隔、限制生育和采用现代避孕方法的讨论和决策的社会和性别规范。本定性研究通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,探讨了社会规范对刚果民主共和国男性计划生育观念、态度和决策的影响。方法:研究方案改编自社会规范探索工具(SNET)中提出的五步过程。数据收集工作在中开赛省、鲁阿拉巴省和桑库鲁省进行。这个过程分为三个阶段:参考群体识别阶段,包括一个简短的定量问卷,对感兴趣的人群(N = 317)的规范和态度的探索,这里有已婚和未婚的男性,以及对男性引用的参考群体(N = 144)的社会规范的进一步探索。结果:计划生育的社会规范是相互矛盾的,将计划生育概念分解为3类描述性和强制性规范:1)现代避孕方法的使用;2)生育间隔和家庭规模;3)夫妻沟通和决策。我们发现,虽然社会规范反对使用现代避孕方法并提倡扩大家庭规模,但对生育间隔的社会支持是显著的。一些男性报告说,如果妻子能够做出最终决定,他们会支持妻子学习避孕方法。然而,另一些男人则认为,让妻子自己寻找方法会损害他们的权威或男子气概。结论:为了提高现代避孕药具的使用率,干预措施应解决导致不遵守避孕药具的潜在问题,分别解决这三类及其相关规范,并在计划生育规划中吸引对每一类都很重要的参考群体,包括医疗保健提供者、宗教领袖和男性同伴群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信