Bioprospecting of four Beauveria bassiana strains and their potential as biological control agents for Anastrepha ludens Loew 1873 (Diptera: Tephritidae).

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324441
Norberto A Angel-Ruiz, Inés Zavala-Izquierdo, Diana Pérez-Staples, Francisco Díaz-Fleisher, Antonio Andrade-Torres, Griselda K Guillén-Navarro, Pablo Colunga-Salas
{"title":"Bioprospecting of four Beauveria bassiana strains and their potential as biological control agents for Anastrepha ludens Loew 1873 (Diptera: Tephritidae).","authors":"Norberto A Angel-Ruiz, Inés Zavala-Izquierdo, Diana Pérez-Staples, Francisco Díaz-Fleisher, Antonio Andrade-Torres, Griselda K Guillén-Navarro, Pablo Colunga-Salas","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anastrepha ludens (Loew) is a pest of major importance on mango and orange crops. The use of biological control agents, including entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), has been widely studied. However, one problem with the use of EPF is that the efficacy of the strains varies with environmental conditions, and thus the use of native strains is suggested. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to bioprospect Beauveria bassiana strains from Veracruz, Mexico and determine their potential as biological control agents for A. ludens. Four strains isolated from infected insects were used to calculate conidium viability percentage, growth rate mycelia, and conidium production in three different media: with rice, with empty A. ludens pupae, and with PDA. The median lethal time (LT50) and median lethal concentration (LC50) of these strains were also calculated in A. ludens adults exposed to concentrations of 105, 106, and 107 conidia/ml. The viability percentage ranged between 88%-98%, and the growth rate was higher in the rice media, with a value of 2.63 mm/day. However, conidium production was higher in the PDA and A. ludens pupae media, with values of 1.18x108 and 7.83x107 conidia/ml, respectively. At the highest concentration, the four strains caused mortality above 80%, and at the lowest concentration, only one strain caused mortality above 50%. The lowest LT50 occurred on day 5.51 at the highest concentration. The present study expands our knowledge on the effect of B. bassiana strains on A. ludens. In conclusion, the four strains used showed optimal levels for their potential use as biological control agents against A. ludens.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anastrepha ludens (Loew) is a pest of major importance on mango and orange crops. The use of biological control agents, including entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), has been widely studied. However, one problem with the use of EPF is that the efficacy of the strains varies with environmental conditions, and thus the use of native strains is suggested. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to bioprospect Beauveria bassiana strains from Veracruz, Mexico and determine their potential as biological control agents for A. ludens. Four strains isolated from infected insects were used to calculate conidium viability percentage, growth rate mycelia, and conidium production in three different media: with rice, with empty A. ludens pupae, and with PDA. The median lethal time (LT50) and median lethal concentration (LC50) of these strains were also calculated in A. ludens adults exposed to concentrations of 105, 106, and 107 conidia/ml. The viability percentage ranged between 88%-98%, and the growth rate was higher in the rice media, with a value of 2.63 mm/day. However, conidium production was higher in the PDA and A. ludens pupae media, with values of 1.18x108 and 7.83x107 conidia/ml, respectively. At the highest concentration, the four strains caused mortality above 80%, and at the lowest concentration, only one strain caused mortality above 50%. The lowest LT50 occurred on day 5.51 at the highest concentration. The present study expands our knowledge on the effect of B. bassiana strains on A. ludens. In conclusion, the four strains used showed optimal levels for their potential use as biological control agents against A. ludens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

4株球孢白僵菌的生物勘探及其防治白僵菌的潜力(双翅目:白僵菌科)
绿僵霉(Anastrepha ludens, low)是芒果和橘子作物的主要害虫。生物防治剂的使用,包括昆虫病原真菌(EPF),已被广泛研究。然而,使用EPF的一个问题是菌株的效力随环境条件而变化,因此建议使用本地菌株。因此,本研究的目的是对来自墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州的白僵菌进行生物前景研究,并确定其作为卢登白僵菌生物防治剂的潜力。利用从侵染昆虫中分离的4株菌株,计算了在水稻、空蛹和PDA三种不同培养基上的分生孢子存活率、菌丝生长速率和分生孢子产量。分别计算了105、106和107个分生孢子/ml对成年褐斑拟蚊的中位致死时间(LT50)和中位致死浓度(LC50)。活性在88% ~ 98%之间,在水稻培养基中的生长速率较高,为2.63 mm/d。而分生孢子的产量在PDA和黄颡鱼蛹培养基中较高,分别为1.18 × 108和7.83 × 107个/ml。在最高浓度下,4株致死率均在80%以上,在最低浓度下,只有1株致死率在50%以上。LT50在第5.51天浓度最高时最低。本研究扩大了我们对球孢白僵菌菌株对路德芽孢杆菌的影响的认识。综上所述,4种菌株均表现出最佳的抑菌水平,具有潜在的防虫潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信