Real-time human-robot interaction and service provision using hybrid intelligent computing framework.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324986
Mohammed Albekairi, Meshari D Alanazi, Turki M Alanazi, Mohamed Vall O Mohamed, Khaled Kaaniche, Anis Sahbani, Ali Elrashidi
{"title":"Real-time human-robot interaction and service provision using hybrid intelligent computing framework.","authors":"Mohammed Albekairi, Meshari D Alanazi, Turki M Alanazi, Mohamed Vall O Mohamed, Khaled Kaaniche, Anis Sahbani, Ali Elrashidi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human-robot interaction has gained significant attention in various domains, including healthcare, customer service, and industrial automation. High computational cost, inefficient service matching, and elevated failure rates in dynamic service contexts are some primary disadvantages of existing query-processing systems. This research introduces a Hybrid Intelligent Computing Model (HICM) to improve robots' ability to process inquiries autonomously. The goal is to make robots better at responding to human questions in real time with efficient, personalized, and context-specific solutions. Using self-organized computing approaches, robotic agents can reliably provide end-users with services suited to their demands. Due to their autonomous nature, robots must be able to calculate quickly and accurately to provide timely services. To meet these needs, the proposed HICM incorporates a sophisticated decision-support system to handle human questions and find the appropriate services. Within this decision-making framework, the model evaluates the characteristics and relevance of questions about accessible services by combining annealing and Tabu Search approaches. To avoid addressing queries incompatibly, the Tabu Search technique approaches query resolution as a non-convergent optimization issue. Comparing HICM's performance to other models reveals significant improvements over CDS, DGTA, and CCS. In particular, HICM reduced calculation time by 8.67%, service time by 15.09%, and failure rates by 7.87%. In terms of important metrics, HICM fared better than the competing models. Its success factor was 11.8% higher, its matching ratio was 14.88% higher, and its failure rates were 6.22% lower. These findings demonstrate the model's efficiency and reliability in terms of robotic query processing and real-time service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-robot interaction has gained significant attention in various domains, including healthcare, customer service, and industrial automation. High computational cost, inefficient service matching, and elevated failure rates in dynamic service contexts are some primary disadvantages of existing query-processing systems. This research introduces a Hybrid Intelligent Computing Model (HICM) to improve robots' ability to process inquiries autonomously. The goal is to make robots better at responding to human questions in real time with efficient, personalized, and context-specific solutions. Using self-organized computing approaches, robotic agents can reliably provide end-users with services suited to their demands. Due to their autonomous nature, robots must be able to calculate quickly and accurately to provide timely services. To meet these needs, the proposed HICM incorporates a sophisticated decision-support system to handle human questions and find the appropriate services. Within this decision-making framework, the model evaluates the characteristics and relevance of questions about accessible services by combining annealing and Tabu Search approaches. To avoid addressing queries incompatibly, the Tabu Search technique approaches query resolution as a non-convergent optimization issue. Comparing HICM's performance to other models reveals significant improvements over CDS, DGTA, and CCS. In particular, HICM reduced calculation time by 8.67%, service time by 15.09%, and failure rates by 7.87%. In terms of important metrics, HICM fared better than the competing models. Its success factor was 11.8% higher, its matching ratio was 14.88% higher, and its failure rates were 6.22% lower. These findings demonstrate the model's efficiency and reliability in terms of robotic query processing and real-time service delivery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于混合智能计算框架的实时人机交互与服务提供。
人机交互在医疗保健、客户服务和工业自动化等各个领域都受到了极大的关注。高计算成本、低效的服务匹配以及动态服务上下文中的高故障率是现有查询处理系统的一些主要缺点。本研究引入混合智能计算模型(HICM)来提高机器人自主处理查询的能力。目标是使机器人能够更好地实时响应人类的问题,并提供高效、个性化和特定于情境的解决方案。使用自组织计算方法,机器人代理可以可靠地为最终用户提供适合其需求的服务。由于机器人的自主性,它们必须能够快速准确地进行计算,以提供及时的服务。为了满足这些需求,拟议的HICM结合了一个复杂的决策支持系统来处理人工问题并找到适当的服务。在此决策框架内,该模型通过结合退火和禁忌搜索方法来评估可访问服务问题的特征和相关性。为了避免查询不兼容,禁忌搜索技术将查询解析作为一个非收敛优化问题来处理。将HICM的性能与其他模型进行比较,可以发现它比CDS、DGTA和CCS有了显著的改进。其中,HICM计算时间减少8.67%,服务时间减少15.09%,故障率减少7.87%。在重要指标方面,HICM比竞争模型表现得更好。其成功率提高11.8%,匹配率提高14.88%,失效率降低6.22%。这些发现证明了该模型在机器人查询处理和实时服务交付方面的效率和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信