Transverse venous sinus stenting versus cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a multi-institutional and multinational database study.
Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Ansaar T Rai, Dhairya A Lakhani
{"title":"Transverse venous sinus stenting versus cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a multi-institutional and multinational database study.","authors":"Jarunee Intrapiromkul, Ansaar T Rai, Dhairya A Lakhani","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting and transverse venous sinus (TVS) stenting are promising treatment choices for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), addressing different aspects of IIH pathophysiology. However, large-scale comparative data remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective propensity score-matched analysis using the TriNetX platform. Adult patients diagnosed with IIH who underwent either TVS stenting or CSF shunting were included. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as the need for subsequent procedures (repeat TVS stenting, CSF shunt, or optic nerve fenestration). Secondary outcomes included residual symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, dizziness, and pulsatile tinnitus), ongoing use of IIH-related medications (furosemide, acetazolamide, and topiramate), and healthcare utilization, assessed through unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits at 1 year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 134 530 IIH patients identified, 1362 underwent TVS stenting and 5278 underwent CSF shunting. After propensity score matching, patients who received TVS stenting had significantly lower odds of repeat interventions (9.6% vs 38.6%; OR 0.169, 95% CI 0.136 to 0.212, P<0.001). They also had significantly lower odds of residual headache, visual disturbances, and papilledema. However, stenting was associated with higher odds of persistent pulsatile tinnitus (6.7% vs 2.2%; OR 3.183, P<0.001). TVS stenting was associated with lower odds of unplanned inpatient readmissions (24.1% vs 40.5%; OR 0.466, P<0.001) and ED visits (22.0% vs 34.0%; OR 0.548, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both TVS stenting and CSF shunting resulted in symptomatic improvement and reduced medication use in patients with IIH. However, stenting was associated with significantly lower treatment failure rates, fewer residual papilledema, headaches and visual symptoms, and reduced healthcare utilization. Persistent pulsatile tinnitus was more common following stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting and transverse venous sinus (TVS) stenting are promising treatment choices for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), addressing different aspects of IIH pathophysiology. However, large-scale comparative data remain limited.
Methods: We performed a multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective propensity score-matched analysis using the TriNetX platform. Adult patients diagnosed with IIH who underwent either TVS stenting or CSF shunting were included. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as the need for subsequent procedures (repeat TVS stenting, CSF shunt, or optic nerve fenestration). Secondary outcomes included residual symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, dizziness, and pulsatile tinnitus), ongoing use of IIH-related medications (furosemide, acetazolamide, and topiramate), and healthcare utilization, assessed through unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits at 1 year follow-up.
Results: Of 134 530 IIH patients identified, 1362 underwent TVS stenting and 5278 underwent CSF shunting. After propensity score matching, patients who received TVS stenting had significantly lower odds of repeat interventions (9.6% vs 38.6%; OR 0.169, 95% CI 0.136 to 0.212, P<0.001). They also had significantly lower odds of residual headache, visual disturbances, and papilledema. However, stenting was associated with higher odds of persistent pulsatile tinnitus (6.7% vs 2.2%; OR 3.183, P<0.001). TVS stenting was associated with lower odds of unplanned inpatient readmissions (24.1% vs 40.5%; OR 0.466, P<0.001) and ED visits (22.0% vs 34.0%; OR 0.548, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Both TVS stenting and CSF shunting resulted in symptomatic improvement and reduced medication use in patients with IIH. However, stenting was associated with significantly lower treatment failure rates, fewer residual papilledema, headaches and visual symptoms, and reduced healthcare utilization. Persistent pulsatile tinnitus was more common following stenting.
背景:脑脊液(CSF)分流术和横静脉窦(TVS)支架置入术是治疗特发性颅内高压(IIH)的有希望的治疗选择,解决了IIH病理生理的不同方面。然而,大规模的比较数据仍然有限。方法:我们使用TriNetX平台进行了一项多国、多机构、回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。诊断为IIH并接受TVS支架置入或脑脊液分流术的成年患者被纳入研究。主要结局是治疗失败,定义为需要后续手术(重复TVS支架置入、脑脊液分流或视神经开窗)。次要结局包括残留症状(头痛、视觉障碍、头晕和搏动性耳鸣)、持续使用与ih相关的药物(呋塞米、乙酰唑胺和托吡酯),以及在1年随访期间通过计划外的医院再入院和急诊科(ED)就诊评估的医疗保健利用情况。结果:在134 530例IIH患者中,1362例接受了TVS支架置入,5278例接受了脑脊液分流术。倾向评分匹配后,接受TVS支架置入的患者重复干预的几率显著降低(9.6% vs 38.6%;OR 0.169, 95% CI 0.136 ~ 0.212,结论:TVS支架置入和脑脊液分流均可改善IIH患者的症状并减少药物使用。然而,支架植入与治疗失败率显著降低、残留乳头水肿、头痛和视觉症状减少以及医疗保健利用率降低相关。持续性搏动性耳鸣在支架置入术后更为常见。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.