Association between uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and abdominal aortic calcification: A cross-sectional study.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yuanming Li, Lishan Bai
{"title":"Association between uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and abdominal aortic calcification: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuanming Li, Lishan Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the potential association between UHR and AAC in adults older than 40 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). UHR equals uric acid (mg/dL) divided by high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL). We used weighted multiple logistic regression or linear regression analysis to investigate the association between UHR and AAC. We conducted subgroup and interaction analyses to investigate whether these associations varied by different confounders. Receiver operating characteristic curve studies were used to compare the diagnostic power of the Framingham scoring model with the Framingham and UHR models for AAC and severe abdominal aortic calcification (SAAC). Sensitivity analyses to determine the robustness of the UHR and AAC association results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final evaluation covered 2294 participants older than 40 years (mean age: 59.01 years; 52.57% female). A 1-unit rise in the log-UHR led to a 0.80 increase in the AAC scores (β [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.46, 1.13]) and a 90% higher risk of AAC (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 1.90 [1.42, 2.54]), and the risk of SAAC increased by 95% (OR [95% CI]:1.95 [1.37, 2.77]). Subgroup analyses showed that the association between log-UHR and AAC scores with SAAC varied by sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified a positive association between UHR and AAC risk, whereas the association of UHR with AAC scores and SAAC was significant only in the female subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.05.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the potential association between UHR and AAC in adults older than 40 years.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). UHR equals uric acid (mg/dL) divided by high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL). We used weighted multiple logistic regression or linear regression analysis to investigate the association between UHR and AAC. We conducted subgroup and interaction analyses to investigate whether these associations varied by different confounders. Receiver operating characteristic curve studies were used to compare the diagnostic power of the Framingham scoring model with the Framingham and UHR models for AAC and severe abdominal aortic calcification (SAAC). Sensitivity analyses to determine the robustness of the UHR and AAC association results.

Results: The final evaluation covered 2294 participants older than 40 years (mean age: 59.01 years; 52.57% female). A 1-unit rise in the log-UHR led to a 0.80 increase in the AAC scores (β [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.46, 1.13]) and a 90% higher risk of AAC (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 1.90 [1.42, 2.54]), and the risk of SAAC increased by 95% (OR [95% CI]:1.95 [1.37, 2.77]). Subgroup analyses showed that the association between log-UHR and AAC scores with SAAC varied by sex.

Conclusions: This study identified a positive association between UHR and AAC risk, whereas the association of UHR with AAC scores and SAAC was significant only in the female subgroup.

尿酸与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值与腹主动脉钙化之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:尿酸与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(UHR)与腹主动脉钙化(AAC)之间的关系尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在探讨40岁以上成人UHR与AAC之间的潜在关联。方法:采用横断面研究方法,收集2013 - 2014年全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据。UHR等于尿酸(mg/dL)除以高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(mg/dL)。我们使用加权多元逻辑回归或线性回归分析来研究UHR与AAC之间的关系。我们进行了亚组分析和相互作用分析,以调查这些关联是否因不同的混杂因素而变化。采用受试者工作特征曲线研究比较Framingham评分模型与Framingham和UHR模型对AAC和重度腹主动脉钙化(SAAC)的诊断能力。敏感性分析以确定UHR和AAC关联结果的稳健性。结果:最终评估包括2294名年龄大于40岁的参与者(平均年龄:59.01岁;52.57%的女性)。log-UHR每增加1个单位,AAC评分增加0.80 (β [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.46, 1.13]), AAC的风险增加90%(比值比[OR] [95% CI]: 1.90 [1.42, 2.54]), SAAC的风险增加95% (OR [95% CI]:1.95[1.37, 2.77])。亚组分析显示,log-UHR和AAC评分与SAAC之间的关系因性别而异。结论:本研究确定了UHR与AAC风险之间的正相关,而UHR与AAC评分和SAAC之间的关联仅在女性亚组中显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信