Cross-Reactivity in Urine of 53 Cannabinoid Analogs and Metabolites Using a Carboxylic Acid Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Homogenous Enzyme Immunoassay (HEIA) Kit and Immunalysis Synthetic Cannabinoid HEIA Kits.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Taylor L Yates, Justin L Poklis, Alaina K Holt, James H Fleming, Ciena Bayard, Stephen A Raso, Michelle R Peace
{"title":"Cross-Reactivity in Urine of 53 Cannabinoid Analogs and Metabolites Using a Carboxylic Acid Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Homogenous Enzyme Immunoassay (HEIA) Kit and Immunalysis Synthetic Cannabinoid HEIA Kits.","authors":"Taylor L Yates, Justin L Poklis, Alaina K Holt, James H Fleming, Ciena Bayard, Stephen A Raso, Michelle R Peace","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancing knowledge of endocannabinoid receptor agonists and the federal legalization of hemp has created a cannabinoid market of naturally abundant phytocannabinoids to a wide array of semi-synthetic and synthetic cannabinoid analogs. Public safety and toxicological concerns exist from lack of regulation, limited pharmacological and metabolomic data, and minimal knowledge of detection ability. Structural similarities of the cannabinoid analogs may allow detection on immunoassays including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and homogenous enzyme immunoassays (HEIA), screening platforms in forensic toxicology laboratories for rapid presumptive testing. The cross-reactivity of 27 cannabinoid analogs and 26 commercially available metabolites was evaluated using the Medica EasyRA Enzymatic Immunoassay Analyzer with the Immunalysis Cannabinoids (THC) and Synthetic Cannabinoids 1-3 kits. These analogs were also evaluated using the Dynex DSX Automated ELISA System with the OraSure Technologies Cannabinoids Intercept Microplate EIA. The cannabinoid kits target 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THCCOOH) at a 50 ng/mL cutoff, and the synthetic cannabinoid kits target the N-pentanoic acid metabolite of JWH-018, UR-144, and AB-PINACA at a 10 ng/mL cutoff. Cross-reactivity was evaluated at concentrations of 20, 50, 100, 500 and 1,000 ng/mL in urine in triplicate. Absence of cross-reactivity at 1,000 ng/mL was considered undetectable. No cross-reactivity was detected on the synthetic cannabinoid kits. Cross-reactivity to Δ9-THCCOOH kits was variable with Δ8-THCCOOH and R-HHCCOOH cross-reacting at the cutoff on the ELISA, with several additional phase I metabolites cross-reacting at 100 ng/mL on both platforms. Analogs lacking the Δ9-THC tricyclic structure and pyran ring cyclization including cannabidiol were undetectable. Alicyclic bond location and alkyl chain length variably affected cross-reactivity, with alkyl lengths 2-4 having increased cross-reactivity comparatively. Compound chirality was also observed to effect instrumental response, with the ELISA having increased cross-reactivity and instrumental response to R-isomers. As knowledge and prevalence of analogs increases, it is crucial to understand the impact on utilized testing platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancing knowledge of endocannabinoid receptor agonists and the federal legalization of hemp has created a cannabinoid market of naturally abundant phytocannabinoids to a wide array of semi-synthetic and synthetic cannabinoid analogs. Public safety and toxicological concerns exist from lack of regulation, limited pharmacological and metabolomic data, and minimal knowledge of detection ability. Structural similarities of the cannabinoid analogs may allow detection on immunoassays including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and homogenous enzyme immunoassays (HEIA), screening platforms in forensic toxicology laboratories for rapid presumptive testing. The cross-reactivity of 27 cannabinoid analogs and 26 commercially available metabolites was evaluated using the Medica EasyRA Enzymatic Immunoassay Analyzer with the Immunalysis Cannabinoids (THC) and Synthetic Cannabinoids 1-3 kits. These analogs were also evaluated using the Dynex DSX Automated ELISA System with the OraSure Technologies Cannabinoids Intercept Microplate EIA. The cannabinoid kits target 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THCCOOH) at a 50 ng/mL cutoff, and the synthetic cannabinoid kits target the N-pentanoic acid metabolite of JWH-018, UR-144, and AB-PINACA at a 10 ng/mL cutoff. Cross-reactivity was evaluated at concentrations of 20, 50, 100, 500 and 1,000 ng/mL in urine in triplicate. Absence of cross-reactivity at 1,000 ng/mL was considered undetectable. No cross-reactivity was detected on the synthetic cannabinoid kits. Cross-reactivity to Δ9-THCCOOH kits was variable with Δ8-THCCOOH and R-HHCCOOH cross-reacting at the cutoff on the ELISA, with several additional phase I metabolites cross-reacting at 100 ng/mL on both platforms. Analogs lacking the Δ9-THC tricyclic structure and pyran ring cyclization including cannabidiol were undetectable. Alicyclic bond location and alkyl chain length variably affected cross-reactivity, with alkyl lengths 2-4 having increased cross-reactivity comparatively. Compound chirality was also observed to effect instrumental response, with the ELISA having increased cross-reactivity and instrumental response to R-isomers. As knowledge and prevalence of analogs increases, it is crucial to understand the impact on utilized testing platforms.

使用羧酸酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、均质酶免疫测定(HEIA)试剂盒和免疫分析合成大麻素HEIA试剂盒研究53种大麻素类似物和代谢物在尿液中的交叉反应性
内源性大麻素受体激动剂和联邦大麻合法化的推进知识创造了一个天然丰富的植物大麻素的大麻素市场,以广泛的半合成和合成大麻素类似物。由于缺乏监管,药理学和代谢组学数据有限,以及对检测能力的了解很少,存在公共安全和毒理学问题。大麻素类似物的结构相似性可能允许在免疫分析中进行检测,包括酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和均质酶免疫测定(HEIA),法医毒理学实验室的筛选平台进行快速推定测试。使用Medica EasyRA酶促免疫分析分析仪,使用Immunalysis Cannabinoids (THC)和Synthetic Cannabinoids 1-3试剂盒,评估27种大麻素类似物和26种市售代谢物的交叉反应性。这些类似物也使用Dynex DSX自动化ELISA系统与OraSure Technologies大麻素拦截微孔板EIA进行评估。大麻素试剂盒以50 ng/mL的截止点靶向11-no -9-羧基-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THCCOOH),合成大麻素试剂盒以10 ng/mL的截止点靶向JWH-018、UR-144和AB-PINACA的N-pentanoic酸代谢物。交叉反应性在浓度分别为20、50、100、500和1000 ng/mL的三份尿液中进行评估。在1000 ng/mL浓度下缺乏交叉反应性被认为是检测不到的。合成大麻素试剂盒未检测到交叉反应性。对Δ9-THCCOOH试剂盒的交叉反应性是可变的,Δ8-THCCOOH和R-HHCCOOH在ELISA的截止点交叉反应,另外几个I期代谢物在100 ng/mL的浓度下在两个平台上交叉反应。缺乏Δ9-THC三环结构和吡喃环环化的类似物包括大麻二酚未被检测到。脂环键的位置和烷基链的长度对交叉反应性有不同的影响,烷基长度2-4的交叉反应性相对较高。化合物手性也被观察到影响仪器反应,ELISA具有增加的交叉反应性和对r -异构体的仪器反应。随着知识的增加和类似物的普及,了解对使用的测试平台的影响是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信