Cannabinoid Profiling Across Toxicology Samples in Adolescents and Young Adults by Route of Administration and in Relation to Depression Symptoms.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Natasha E Wade, Alexander L Wallace, Rachel Baca, Gianna Andrade, Joseph P Happer, Kelly E Courtney, Uwe Christians, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Marilyn A Huestis, Joanna Jacobus
{"title":"Cannabinoid Profiling Across Toxicology Samples in Adolescents and Young Adults by Route of Administration and in Relation to Depression Symptoms.","authors":"Natasha E Wade, Alexander L Wallace, Rachel Baca, Gianna Andrade, Joseph P Happer, Kelly E Courtney, Uwe Christians, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Marilyn A Huestis, Joanna Jacobus","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use is common, with diversity in cannabis products contributing to difficulty in accurately assessing the impact of cannabis use in vulnerable populations such as emerging adults. This study describes and assesses concurrence across toxicological matrices (oral fluid, plasma, urine, and hair) and self-reported cannabis use days. Further, it examines whether 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH, the primary metabolite of Δ9-tetrahydrocannbinol [THC]) concentration or use patterns varies by administration route (smoked flower or vaped concentrate) or predicts depression symptoms. Here, cannabis using (n = 70) and non-using (n = 24) adolescents and young adults (64% female; ages 18-21) were asked to contribute oral fluid, blood, urine, and hair for toxicological testing and self-reported past-90 days of cannabis use, including route of administration. Positive and negative toxicological results by matrix are presented, with sensitivity and specificity calculated. Correlations between THCCOOH concentration across matrices and self-report use were run. Analysis of variance models (ANOVAs) tested whether product type (smoked flower v. vaped concentrate) influenced cannabis use patterns, use to avoid withdrawal, or THCCOOH concentration. Regressions assessed cannabis metrics predicting depression symptoms, controlling for biological sex. All matrices demonstrated excellent specificity (100%), with largely adequate sensitivity (63-74%) except for oral fluid (12%). Self-report and toxicological metrics were significantly correlated (r's = .41-.97), except for avoiding withdrawal. THCCOOH concentration across matrices did not differ by route of administration group; groups also did not differ by self-reported use days or avoiding withdrawal symptoms (p's = .16-.66). Only plasma THCCOOH concentration predicted depression symptoms (beta = 4.43, p < .001). Taken together, toxicological matrices and self-reported cannabis use offer concurrent information in adolescents and young adults who regularly use cannabis. Plasma THCCOOH concentration uniquely predicted self-reported depression symptoms, indicating utility of toxicological cannabinoid concentration predicting clinical outcomes. Given the complexity of measuring cannabis use due to the plethora of available products and rise of new popular cannabinoids, use of toxicological results may offer new insights into clinical outcomes in those who frequently use cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis use is common, with diversity in cannabis products contributing to difficulty in accurately assessing the impact of cannabis use in vulnerable populations such as emerging adults. This study describes and assesses concurrence across toxicological matrices (oral fluid, plasma, urine, and hair) and self-reported cannabis use days. Further, it examines whether 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH, the primary metabolite of Δ9-tetrahydrocannbinol [THC]) concentration or use patterns varies by administration route (smoked flower or vaped concentrate) or predicts depression symptoms. Here, cannabis using (n = 70) and non-using (n = 24) adolescents and young adults (64% female; ages 18-21) were asked to contribute oral fluid, blood, urine, and hair for toxicological testing and self-reported past-90 days of cannabis use, including route of administration. Positive and negative toxicological results by matrix are presented, with sensitivity and specificity calculated. Correlations between THCCOOH concentration across matrices and self-report use were run. Analysis of variance models (ANOVAs) tested whether product type (smoked flower v. vaped concentrate) influenced cannabis use patterns, use to avoid withdrawal, or THCCOOH concentration. Regressions assessed cannabis metrics predicting depression symptoms, controlling for biological sex. All matrices demonstrated excellent specificity (100%), with largely adequate sensitivity (63-74%) except for oral fluid (12%). Self-report and toxicological metrics were significantly correlated (r's = .41-.97), except for avoiding withdrawal. THCCOOH concentration across matrices did not differ by route of administration group; groups also did not differ by self-reported use days or avoiding withdrawal symptoms (p's = .16-.66). Only plasma THCCOOH concentration predicted depression symptoms (beta = 4.43, p < .001). Taken together, toxicological matrices and self-reported cannabis use offer concurrent information in adolescents and young adults who regularly use cannabis. Plasma THCCOOH concentration uniquely predicted self-reported depression symptoms, indicating utility of toxicological cannabinoid concentration predicting clinical outcomes. Given the complexity of measuring cannabis use due to the plethora of available products and rise of new popular cannabinoids, use of toxicological results may offer new insights into clinical outcomes in those who frequently use cannabis.

通过给药途径和与抑郁症状的关系,大麻素在青少年和青壮年毒理学样本中的分析。
大麻使用很普遍,大麻产品的多样性导致难以准确评估大麻使用对新兴成年人等弱势群体的影响。本研究描述并评估了毒理学基质(口服液、血浆、尿液和毛发)和自我报告的大麻使用天数之间的一致性。此外,它还研究了11-不-9-羧基四氢大麻酚(THCCOOH, Δ9-tetrahydrocannbinol [THC]的主要代谢物)的浓度或使用模式是否因给药途径(烟熏花或蒸汽浓缩物)而异,或预测抑郁症状。在这里,使用大麻(n = 70)和不使用大麻(n = 24)的青少年和年轻人(64%为女性;要求年龄在18-21岁之间的人提供口服液、血液、尿液和头发用于毒理学测试,并自我报告过去90天的大麻使用情况,包括给药途径。给出了基质的阳性和阴性毒理学结果,并计算了敏感性和特异性。分析了THCCOOH浓度与自我报告使用之间的相关性。方差模型分析(ANOVAs)测试了产品类型(烟熏花或雾化浓缩物)是否影响大麻使用模式、使用以避免戒断或四氢大麻酚浓度。回归评估大麻指标预测抑郁症状,控制生物性别。除口服液(12%)外,所有基质均表现出良好的特异性(100%),具有足够的灵敏度(63-74%)。除避免戒断外,自我报告与毒理学指标显著相关(r = 0.41 - 0.97)。不同给药途径组间基质间thccoh浓度无差异;两组在自我报告的使用天数或避免戒断症状方面也没有差异(p = 0.16 - 0.66)。只有血浆THCCOOH浓度能预测抑郁症状(β = 4.43, p < 0.001)。总而言之,毒理学矩阵和自我报告的大麻使用情况为经常使用大麻的青少年和年轻人提供了同步信息。血浆四氢大麻酚浓度可预测自我报告的抑郁症状,表明毒理学大麻素浓度预测临床结果的效用。由于可用产品过多和新型流行大麻素的增加,测量大麻使用的复杂性,使用毒理学结果可能为经常使用大麻的人的临床结果提供新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信