Relationship Between Anthracycline-cyclophosphamide Regimens and Docetaxel Monotherapy in Oral Mucositis Development.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.14021
Yoshitaka Saito, Tatsuhiko Sakamoto, Yoh Takekuma, Masato Takahashi, Tomohiro Oshino, Mitsuru Sugawara
{"title":"Relationship Between Anthracycline-cyclophosphamide Regimens and Docetaxel Monotherapy in Oral Mucositis Development.","authors":"Yoshitaka Saito, Tatsuhiko Sakamoto, Yoh Takekuma, Masato Takahashi, Tomohiro Oshino, Mitsuru Sugawara","doi":"10.21873/invivo.14021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>We have previously reported that patients experiencing oral mucositis (OM) during anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment develop symptoms following subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy for perioperative breast cancer therapy. However, the concomitant use of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with docetaxel has also been suggested as a significant risk factor for OM. This study aimed to further evaluate the direct relationship of OM with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment and docetaxel monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with breast cancer who underwent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment followed by docetaxel monotherapy as perioperative therapy (n=63) were divided into control and OM-experience groups based on the absence or presence of OM development during prior anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment, and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the comparison of all-grade OM incidence in the first docetaxel cycle between the two groups. The incidence of OM and dysgeusia was also assessed across all treatment cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of all-grade OM was 42.9% in the OM-experience group and 9.5% in the control group during the first cycle (<i>p</i>=0.006) and 47.6% and 11.9% across all treatment cycles (<i>p</i>=0.004), thereby achieving the primary endpoint. In contrast, the incidence of grade ≥2 OM in both settings was higher in the OM-experience group than in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (14.3% <i>vs</i>. 2.4%, <i>p</i>=0.10 for both settings). Moreover, the incidence of dysgeusia did not differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients exhibiting OM during prior anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment were significantly more likely to develop symptoms during subsequent docetaxel monotherapy for perioperative breast cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 4","pages":"2259-2266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: We have previously reported that patients experiencing oral mucositis (OM) during anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment develop symptoms following subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy for perioperative breast cancer therapy. However, the concomitant use of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with docetaxel has also been suggested as a significant risk factor for OM. This study aimed to further evaluate the direct relationship of OM with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment and docetaxel monotherapy.

Patients and methods: Patients with breast cancer who underwent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment followed by docetaxel monotherapy as perioperative therapy (n=63) were divided into control and OM-experience groups based on the absence or presence of OM development during prior anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment, and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the comparison of all-grade OM incidence in the first docetaxel cycle between the two groups. The incidence of OM and dysgeusia was also assessed across all treatment cycles.

Results: The incidence of all-grade OM was 42.9% in the OM-experience group and 9.5% in the control group during the first cycle (p=0.006) and 47.6% and 11.9% across all treatment cycles (p=0.004), thereby achieving the primary endpoint. In contrast, the incidence of grade ≥2 OM in both settings was higher in the OM-experience group than in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (14.3% vs. 2.4%, p=0.10 for both settings). Moreover, the incidence of dysgeusia did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion: Patients exhibiting OM during prior anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment were significantly more likely to develop symptoms during subsequent docetaxel monotherapy for perioperative breast cancer therapy.

蒽环类药物-环磷酰胺方案与多西他赛单药治疗口腔黏膜炎发展的关系。
背景/目的:我们之前报道过在蒽环类环磷酰胺治疗期间出现口腔黏膜炎(OM)的患者在随后的含多西他赛的乳腺癌围手术期化疗后出现症状。然而,帕妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗与多西他赛同时使用也被认为是OM的一个重要危险因素。本研究旨在进一步评价OM与蒽环类药物-环磷酰胺治疗和多西他赛单药治疗的直接关系。患者和方法:63例接受蒽环类环磷酰胺治疗后再加多西他赛单药围手术期治疗的乳腺癌患者,根据既往蒽环类环磷酰胺治疗期间是否有OM发生,分为对照组和OM经历组,并进行回顾性评价。主要终点是比较两组在第一个多西他赛周期中所有级别OM的发生率。还评估了所有治疗周期中OM和读写困难的发生率。结果:在第一个治疗周期中,有OM经历组和对照组的全级别OM发生率分别为42.9%和9.5% (p=0.006),在所有治疗周期中分别为47.6%和11.9% (p=0.004),达到了主要终点。相比之下,两种情况下≥2级OM的发生率在OM经历组均高于对照组,尽管差异无统计学意义(14.3%对2.4%,两种情况p=0.10)。此外,两组之间的阅读障碍发生率没有差异。结论:既往蒽环类药物-环磷酰胺治疗期间出现OM的患者在随后的多西他赛单药乳腺癌围手术期治疗中更容易出现症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信