Assessment of Process Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Energy Supply Scenarios: A Case Study of Future Full-scale Electrified Potash Mining and Production in Thailand.
{"title":"Assessment of Process Energy Intensity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Energy Supply Scenarios: A Case Study of Future Full-scale Electrified Potash Mining and Production in Thailand.","authors":"Apisit Numprasanthai, Penradee Chanpiwat","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Demand for materials to support economic and social development has made the mining and materials production industry one of the most energy-intensive sectors and a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study quantified the energy intensity for all potash production processes throughout the mine lifetime and the GHG emissions and intensities of potash production under different energy supply scenarios (purchased grid electricity alone or a combination of grid electricity and self-generated electricity using local biomass as fuel feedstock). A total of 40.4%, 42.5% and 17.1% of the overall energy demand is distributed to the energy required for ore extraction, potash recovery, and daily project operations, respectively. The overall energy intensities (MJ/ton of potash concentrate produced) are lower during the production phase (1,028 ± 13) than during the mine development (5,003 ± 2,766) and closure (1,759 ± 430) phases because 1.5 to 2.3 more ore is extracted in the former phase. The assessment of total GHG emissions confirmed lower annual emissions from the project operation solely based on grid electricity (153.18 kt CO2 eq) than those of the operations based on biomass electricity production using only palm kernel shells (283.67 to 287.42 kt CO2 eq) and a mixture of palm kernel shells and fuel woods (247.23 to 251.22 kt CO2 eq). Uncertainty analyses indicate 1.6- to 1.7-fold lower or 1.4-fold greater total annual GHG emissions than emissions estimated via a deterministic calculation approach. Over the 20-year project lifetime, a maximum of 5,748.4 kt CO2 eq will be emitted if electricity is generated from the combustion of 100% palm kernel shells. The differences in the environmental performance of potash production observed through comparisons of GHG emission intensities between this study and other potash production companies are caused mainly by the mining method, source of energy for project operation and utilization of renewable energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Demand for materials to support economic and social development has made the mining and materials production industry one of the most energy-intensive sectors and a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study quantified the energy intensity for all potash production processes throughout the mine lifetime and the GHG emissions and intensities of potash production under different energy supply scenarios (purchased grid electricity alone or a combination of grid electricity and self-generated electricity using local biomass as fuel feedstock). A total of 40.4%, 42.5% and 17.1% of the overall energy demand is distributed to the energy required for ore extraction, potash recovery, and daily project operations, respectively. The overall energy intensities (MJ/ton of potash concentrate produced) are lower during the production phase (1,028 ± 13) than during the mine development (5,003 ± 2,766) and closure (1,759 ± 430) phases because 1.5 to 2.3 more ore is extracted in the former phase. The assessment of total GHG emissions confirmed lower annual emissions from the project operation solely based on grid electricity (153.18 kt CO2 eq) than those of the operations based on biomass electricity production using only palm kernel shells (283.67 to 287.42 kt CO2 eq) and a mixture of palm kernel shells and fuel woods (247.23 to 251.22 kt CO2 eq). Uncertainty analyses indicate 1.6- to 1.7-fold lower or 1.4-fold greater total annual GHG emissions than emissions estimated via a deterministic calculation approach. Over the 20-year project lifetime, a maximum of 5,748.4 kt CO2 eq will be emitted if electricity is generated from the combustion of 100% palm kernel shells. The differences in the environmental performance of potash production observed through comparisons of GHG emission intensities between this study and other potash production companies are caused mainly by the mining method, source of energy for project operation and utilization of renewable energy.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.