Identifying the Primary Tumor Site and Distinguishing False-positives in Patients With Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.14035
Hiroaki Satoh, Takumi Sakamoto, Yutaka Takahashi, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Satoshi Inagawa
{"title":"Identifying the Primary Tumor Site and Distinguishing False-positives in Patients With Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen.","authors":"Hiroaki Satoh, Takumi Sakamoto, Yutaka Takahashi, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Satoshi Inagawa","doi":"10.21873/invivo.14035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a tumor marker that is frequently evaluated clinically for gastrointestinal and lung cancers. CEA is a glycoprotein antigen, and only the \"value\" measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is provided in the clinical setting. At present, no method has been established to indicate whether the value is a false-positive elevation or whether there is a primary cancer site. To obtain clues on how to identify the originating site in patients with cancer with high CEA levels and to identify CEA false-positives in healthy individuals, we conducted an exploratory study.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A pilot study was performed using the multivariate analysis method and principal component analysis-discriminant analysis on proteomic results obtained using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) in two patients with lung cancer, one patient with gastric cancer, and one healthy control individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in specific proteins associated with high CEA levels were detected between lung and gastric cancers using LC/MS. Therefore, we performed statistical analysis using principal component analysis-discriminant analysis to determine whether there were differences in the protein signal patterns obtained using LC/MS. The results showed that the plots obtained for each patient and the healthy control were located in different quadrants of the four-quadrant matrix scatter plot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest the possibility of visually differentiating the primary tumor site in patients with elevated CEA levels. This method may also help recognize false-positive CEA results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 4","pages":"2371-2376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a tumor marker that is frequently evaluated clinically for gastrointestinal and lung cancers. CEA is a glycoprotein antigen, and only the "value" measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is provided in the clinical setting. At present, no method has been established to indicate whether the value is a false-positive elevation or whether there is a primary cancer site. To obtain clues on how to identify the originating site in patients with cancer with high CEA levels and to identify CEA false-positives in healthy individuals, we conducted an exploratory study.

Patients and methods: A pilot study was performed using the multivariate analysis method and principal component analysis-discriminant analysis on proteomic results obtained using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) in two patients with lung cancer, one patient with gastric cancer, and one healthy control individual.

Results: No differences in specific proteins associated with high CEA levels were detected between lung and gastric cancers using LC/MS. Therefore, we performed statistical analysis using principal component analysis-discriminant analysis to determine whether there were differences in the protein signal patterns obtained using LC/MS. The results showed that the plots obtained for each patient and the healthy control were located in different quadrants of the four-quadrant matrix scatter plot.

Conclusion: Our results suggest the possibility of visually differentiating the primary tumor site in patients with elevated CEA levels. This method may also help recognize false-positive CEA results.

血清癌胚抗原升高患者原发肿瘤部位的鉴别及假阳性的鉴别。
背景/目的:癌胚抗原(CEA)是临床上常用于胃肠道和肺癌的肿瘤标志物。CEA是一种糖蛋白抗原,只有酶联免疫吸附法测量的“值”才能在临床环境中提供。目前,还没有建立方法来表明该值是否为假阳性升高或是否存在原发性癌症部位。为了获得如何在CEA高水平的癌症患者中识别起源部位以及在健康个体中识别CEA假阳性的线索,我们进行了一项探索性研究。患者和方法:对2例肺癌患者、1例胃癌患者和1例健康对照者的蛋白质组学结果,采用多变量分析方法和主成分分析-判别分析。结果:LC/MS在肺癌和胃癌中未检测到与高CEA水平相关的特异性蛋白。因此,我们使用主成分分析-判别分析进行统计分析,以确定LC/MS获得的蛋白质信号模式是否存在差异。结果表明,每个患者和健康对照的图位于四象限矩阵散点图的不同象限。结论:我们的研究结果提示在CEA水平升高的患者中,可以从视觉上鉴别原发肿瘤部位。这种方法也可以帮助识别假阳性CEA结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信