Flight tube and field cage studies of harmonic radar tagged Bactrocera dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae): effects of tag size, sex, rearing, and irradiation.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Matthew S Siderhurst, Anika L Hurst, Nicolas Ladizinsky, Charles J Mason, Sayaka Aoki
{"title":"Flight tube and field cage studies of harmonic radar tagged Bactrocera dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae): effects of tag size, sex, rearing, and irradiation.","authors":"Matthew S Siderhurst, Anika L Hurst, Nicolas Ladizinsky, Charles J Mason, Sayaka Aoki","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tracking individual insects with harmonic radar (HR) allows observations of insect movement behavior under wild and semi-wild conditions. However, attaching tags to insects has the potential to alter natural behavior. Quantifying the negative effects of tag attachment may allow researchers to correct movement parameters to account for deviations from natural movements, thus producing more accurate estimates of insect behavior. Using two HR tag sizes, ~350 (small) and ~570 μg (large), the movements of Ceratitis capitata and Bactrocera dorsalis were investigated in flight tubes and an outdoor field cage. Bactrocera dorsalis with small tags attached did not perform differently than untagged flies in flight tubes, while flies with large tags took longer to exit the tubes. Time to exit did not vary with B. dorsalis body size, wing area, or wing length for any tagged status (untagged, small, or large). However, B. dorsalis exit times did vary with rearing and irradiation status but not with sex. For C. capitata, negative impacts were observed on both the time to exit and the failure to exit rate. Field cage experiments revealed differences in movement parameters among tested groups. For instance, female, colony-reared, non-irradiated, B. dorsalis showed the greatest bias in (pseudo) turning angles; male, wild, non-irradiated, B. dorsalis showed the weakest correlation between flight and wind direction (β); and colony-reared C. capitata showed random movement directions (other groups showed directional biases). This study shows the feasibility of tracking tephritids as small as C. capitata and demonstrates the advantages of using the smallest possible tags.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvaf064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracking individual insects with harmonic radar (HR) allows observations of insect movement behavior under wild and semi-wild conditions. However, attaching tags to insects has the potential to alter natural behavior. Quantifying the negative effects of tag attachment may allow researchers to correct movement parameters to account for deviations from natural movements, thus producing more accurate estimates of insect behavior. Using two HR tag sizes, ~350 (small) and ~570 μg (large), the movements of Ceratitis capitata and Bactrocera dorsalis were investigated in flight tubes and an outdoor field cage. Bactrocera dorsalis with small tags attached did not perform differently than untagged flies in flight tubes, while flies with large tags took longer to exit the tubes. Time to exit did not vary with B. dorsalis body size, wing area, or wing length for any tagged status (untagged, small, or large). However, B. dorsalis exit times did vary with rearing and irradiation status but not with sex. For C. capitata, negative impacts were observed on both the time to exit and the failure to exit rate. Field cage experiments revealed differences in movement parameters among tested groups. For instance, female, colony-reared, non-irradiated, B. dorsalis showed the greatest bias in (pseudo) turning angles; male, wild, non-irradiated, B. dorsalis showed the weakest correlation between flight and wind direction (β); and colony-reared C. capitata showed random movement directions (other groups showed directional biases). This study shows the feasibility of tracking tephritids as small as C. capitata and demonstrates the advantages of using the smallest possible tags.

谐波雷达标记的背小实蝇和头角certis(双翅目,绦虫科)的飞行管和野外笼研究:标记大小、性别、饲养和辐照的影响。
用谐波雷达(HR)跟踪昆虫个体,可以观察昆虫在野生和半野生条件下的运动行为。然而,给昆虫贴上标签有可能改变它们的自然行为。量化标签附着的负面影响可能使研究人员能够纠正运动参数,以解释与自然运动的偏差,从而对昆虫的行为产生更准确的估计。采用~350 μg(小)和~570 μg(大)两种大小的HR标签,分别在飞行管和室外野外笼中观察头角蚴和背小实蝇的运动情况。携带小标签的背小实蝇在飞行管中的表现与未携带标签的果蝇没有区别,而携带大标签的果蝇需要更长的时间才能离开飞行管。在任何标记状态下(无标记、小标记或大标记),退出时间不随背salalis的体型、翅膀面积或翅膀长度而变化。背背小蠊的退出时间随饲养方式和辐照程度的不同而不同,但与性别无关。柠条的退出时间和退出失败率均有负向影响。野外笼实验显示各组运动参数存在差异。例如,在未辐照的情况下,雌蜂在(伪)转角上的偏差最大;雄性、野生、未辐照的背背小蠊的飞行与风向的相关性最弱(β);群居饲养的小头鸡表现出随机的运动方向(其他组表现出方向性偏差)。这项研究显示了跟踪小到C. capitata的绦虫的可行性,并展示了使用尽可能小的标签的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信