Radiomic 'Stress Test': exploration of a deep learning radiomic model in a high-risk prospective lung nodule cohort.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
David Xiao, Yency Forero, Michael N Kammer, Heidi Chen, Rafael Paez, Brent E Heideman, Oreoluwa Owoseeni, Ian Johnson, Stephen A Deppen, Eric L Grogan, Fabien Maldonado
{"title":"Radiomic 'Stress Test': exploration of a deep learning radiomic model in a high-risk prospective lung nodule cohort.","authors":"David Xiao, Yency Forero, Michael N Kammer, Heidi Chen, Rafael Paez, Brent E Heideman, Oreoluwa Owoseeni, Ian Johnson, Stephen A Deppen, Eric L Grogan, Fabien Maldonado","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly biopsied to ascertain a diagnosis of lung cancer, but many are ultimately benign. The Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) score is a commercially available deep learning radiomic model with strong diagnostic performance in incidentally identified IPNs, but its potential use to reduce the need for invasive procedures has not been evaluated in patients with nodules for which a biopsy has been recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation, the probability of cancer in consecutively biopsied IPNs at a tertiary care centre was calculated using the Mayo Clinic prediction model and categorised into low, intermediate and high-probability groups by applying <10% no-test and >70% treatment thresholds per British Thoracic Society guidelines. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Mayo Clinic model, the LCP radiomic model and an integrated model combining the LCP score with statistically selected clinical variables (age, spiculation and upper lobe location) using stepwise logistic regression. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score and reclassification analysis based on the bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 196 malignant and 125 benign IPNs (61% prevalence of malignancy). The Mayo Clinic model's AUC was 0.69 (0.63-0.75), LCP's AUC was 0.67 (0.61-0.73) and the integrated model combining LCP with statistically selected clinical variables (age, spiculation and upper lobe location) had the highest AUC of 0.75 (0.69-0.80). The integrated model demonstrated improved classification, with an F1 score of 0.645 (0.572-0.716) and a significantly higher AUC compared with the Mayo Clinic model (p=0.046). Reclassification analysis showed a clinical net reclassification index of 0.36 (0.21-0.53) for benign IPNs with eight correctly downgraded intermediate-risk benign nodules and no malignant nodules misclassified into the low-risk category.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating LCP with select clinical variables results in an improvement in malignancy risk prediction and nodule classification and could reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies for IPNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly biopsied to ascertain a diagnosis of lung cancer, but many are ultimately benign. The Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) score is a commercially available deep learning radiomic model with strong diagnostic performance in incidentally identified IPNs, but its potential use to reduce the need for invasive procedures has not been evaluated in patients with nodules for which a biopsy has been recommended.

Methods: In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation, the probability of cancer in consecutively biopsied IPNs at a tertiary care centre was calculated using the Mayo Clinic prediction model and categorised into low, intermediate and high-probability groups by applying <10% no-test and >70% treatment thresholds per British Thoracic Society guidelines. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Mayo Clinic model, the LCP radiomic model and an integrated model combining the LCP score with statistically selected clinical variables (age, spiculation and upper lobe location) using stepwise logistic regression. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score and reclassification analysis based on the bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index.

Results: The study population included 196 malignant and 125 benign IPNs (61% prevalence of malignancy). The Mayo Clinic model's AUC was 0.69 (0.63-0.75), LCP's AUC was 0.67 (0.61-0.73) and the integrated model combining LCP with statistically selected clinical variables (age, spiculation and upper lobe location) had the highest AUC of 0.75 (0.69-0.80). The integrated model demonstrated improved classification, with an F1 score of 0.645 (0.572-0.716) and a significantly higher AUC compared with the Mayo Clinic model (p=0.046). Reclassification analysis showed a clinical net reclassification index of 0.36 (0.21-0.53) for benign IPNs with eight correctly downgraded intermediate-risk benign nodules and no malignant nodules misclassified into the low-risk category.

Conclusion: Incorporating LCP with select clinical variables results in an improvement in malignancy risk prediction and nodule classification and could reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies for IPNs.

放射组学“压力测试”:在高风险前瞻性肺结节队列中探索深度学习放射组学模型。
背景:不确定肺结节(ipn)通常通过活检来确定肺癌的诊断,但许多最终是良性的。肺癌预测(LCP)评分是一种商业上可用的深度学习放射学模型,在偶然发现的ipn中具有很强的诊断性能,但在推荐活检的结节患者中,其减少侵入性手术需求的潜在用途尚未得到评估。方法:在这项前瞻性、回顾性的盲法评估中,使用梅奥诊所预测模型计算三级保健中心连续活检的ipn的癌症概率,并根据英国胸科学会指南采用70%的治疗阈值将其分为低、中、高概率组。我们使用逐步逻辑回归评估了梅奥诊所模型、LCP放射学模型和LCP评分与统计选择的临床变量(年龄、穿刺和上肺叶位置)相结合的综合模型的诊断性能。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、F1评分和基于偏倚校正临床净重分类指数的重分类分析来评估疗效。结果:研究人群中恶性IPNs 196例,良性IPNs 125例(恶性发生率61%)。Mayo Clinic模型的AUC为0.69 (0.63-0.75),LCP模型的AUC为0.67 (0.61-0.73),LCP与统计学上选择的临床变量(年龄、毛囊、上叶位置)相结合的综合模型的AUC最高,为0.75(0.69-0.80)。与Mayo Clinic模型相比,综合模型的分类效果更好,F1评分为0.645 (0.572-0.716),AUC显著提高(p=0.046)。重新分类分析显示,良性IPNs的临床净重新分类指数为0.36(0.21-0.53),其中8个正确降级的中危良性结节,没有恶性结节被错误划分为低危类别。结论:将LCP与选定的临床变量相结合,可改善IPNs的恶性风险预测和结节分类,并可减少不必要的侵入性活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信