Social areas revisited through the lens of mobility: A comparative study of the traditional and mobility approaches

IF 7.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Run Shi , Anthony Gar-On Yeh , Fang Bian
{"title":"Social areas revisited through the lens of mobility: A comparative study of the traditional and mobility approaches","authors":"Run Shi ,&nbsp;Anthony Gar-On Yeh ,&nbsp;Fang Bian","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2025.102325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social area analysis is a framework for understanding residential social structure as a product of urbanization and economic development. Building on our previous findings that socioeconomically similar residents exhibit different mobility patterns, this study examines urban socio-spatial structure by incorporating commuting patterns from mobile phone data with census in Shenzhen, China. We conduct a comparative analysis to explore differences between the traditional and mobility approaches. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) results reveal that mobility is an essential dimension of socio-spatial differentiation at the aggregated neighborhood committee level. The derived residential social structure explicitly highlights mobility disparities, providing evidence for possible segregation and potential improvements in urban planning. By analyzing the interplays of economic, political, and social forces, we conceptualize mobility as a sub-dimension of social space. The contribution of this study lies in two folds. First, we propose a framework for integrating mobile phone data with census data to capture mobility disparities at the aggregated level with the concept of activity space. Second, we explore the role of mobility in delineating urban socio-spatial structure, providing a novel perspective for examining the internal spatial structure of cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48241,"journal":{"name":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102325"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019897152500078X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social area analysis is a framework for understanding residential social structure as a product of urbanization and economic development. Building on our previous findings that socioeconomically similar residents exhibit different mobility patterns, this study examines urban socio-spatial structure by incorporating commuting patterns from mobile phone data with census in Shenzhen, China. We conduct a comparative analysis to explore differences between the traditional and mobility approaches. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) results reveal that mobility is an essential dimension of socio-spatial differentiation at the aggregated neighborhood committee level. The derived residential social structure explicitly highlights mobility disparities, providing evidence for possible segregation and potential improvements in urban planning. By analyzing the interplays of economic, political, and social forces, we conceptualize mobility as a sub-dimension of social space. The contribution of this study lies in two folds. First, we propose a framework for integrating mobile phone data with census data to capture mobility disparities at the aggregated level with the concept of activity space. Second, we explore the role of mobility in delineating urban socio-spatial structure, providing a novel perspective for examining the internal spatial structure of cities.
通过流动性视角重新审视社会领域:传统方法与流动性方法的比较研究
社会区域分析是将住宅社会结构作为城市化和经济发展的产物来理解的一个框架。基于我们之前的研究结果,社会经济相似的居民表现出不同的流动模式,本研究通过结合移动电话数据和中国深圳人口普查的通勤模式来研究城市社会空间结构。我们进行了比较分析,以探讨传统方法和流动方法之间的差异。主成分分析(PCA)结果表明,流动性是综合居委会社会空间分异的重要维度。由此衍生的住宅社会结构明确强调了流动性差异,为可能的隔离和城市规划的潜在改进提供了证据。通过分析经济、政治和社会力量的相互作用,我们将流动性概念化为社会空间的一个子维度。本研究的贡献在于两个方面。首先,我们提出了一个整合移动电话数据和人口普查数据的框架,通过活动空间的概念在总体水平上捕捉移动差异。其次,我们探讨了流动性在描述城市社会空间结构中的作用,为研究城市内部空间结构提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Computers, Environment and Urban Systemsis an interdisciplinary journal publishing cutting-edge and innovative computer-based research on environmental and urban systems, that privileges the geospatial perspective. The journal welcomes original high quality scholarship of a theoretical, applied or technological nature, and provides a stimulating presentation of perspectives, research developments, overviews of important new technologies and uses of major computational, information-based, and visualization innovations. Applied and theoretical contributions demonstrate the scope of computer-based analysis fostering a better understanding of environmental and urban systems, their spatial scope and their dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信