Prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrea Camera, Tawhidul Islam, Reza Parvan, Søren Erik Pischke, Gustavo Jose Justo Silva, Kåre-Olav Stensløkken
{"title":"Prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Camera, Tawhidul Islam, Reza Parvan, Søren Erik Pischke, Gustavo Jose Justo Silva, Kåre-Olav Stensløkken","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplantation (LT) is a therapeutic option for patients suffering from end-stage liver diseases. Recent research has probed the prognostic significance of biomarkers to predict graft function and mortality post-transplant, yet few candidates are recommended in clinical practice. We employed a pipeline that integrates meta-analysis (PRISMA 2020), followed by Kaplan Meier (KM)-based individual patient data (IPD) analysis, aiming to identify potential novel prognostic biomarker panels for LT recipients. Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Twenty-one prognostic and eight diagnostic studies were eligible, pooling 34922 patients. Single biomarkers sampled at an early stage (≤15 d after LT) were significant associated with graft-related outcomes (HR/OR 0.95 (0.94-0.97)) but did not predict mortality (HR/OR 1.00 (0.97-1.04)) or composite outcomes (HR/OR 1.02 (0.98-1.07)). Biomarkers in combination (GGT/bilirubin ratio, ALT+AST or ALT+AST+bilirubin+INR) predicted composite outcomes (graft failure or mortality, aHR/aOR 4.37 (2.65-7.21)). Biomarkers assessed at late stage (>15) did not show association with mortality (HR/OR 1.02 (1.00-1.04)) or composite outcomes (HR/OR 1.00 (0.99-1.01)). KM-based IPD analysis showed that coagulation factor V combined with ALT predicted graft survival (HR 2.12 (1.44-3.12)), and coagulation factor V+Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 stratified the risk of patient survival (HR 2.97 (1.79-4.91)). Therefore, we were able to compare various scoring systems in predicting graft-related outcomes and mortality followed LT. Additionally, we identified novel combinations of biomarkers that exhibited prognostic value for LT patients. Finally, we demonstrate that combined analytical tools for assessing large clinical datasets effectively evaluate multi-modal markers for risk stratification of early and late outcomes for LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":520704,"journal":{"name":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) is a therapeutic option for patients suffering from end-stage liver diseases. Recent research has probed the prognostic significance of biomarkers to predict graft function and mortality post-transplant, yet few candidates are recommended in clinical practice. We employed a pipeline that integrates meta-analysis (PRISMA 2020), followed by Kaplan Meier (KM)-based individual patient data (IPD) analysis, aiming to identify potential novel prognostic biomarker panels for LT recipients. Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Twenty-one prognostic and eight diagnostic studies were eligible, pooling 34922 patients. Single biomarkers sampled at an early stage (≤15 d after LT) were significant associated with graft-related outcomes (HR/OR 0.95 (0.94-0.97)) but did not predict mortality (HR/OR 1.00 (0.97-1.04)) or composite outcomes (HR/OR 1.02 (0.98-1.07)). Biomarkers in combination (GGT/bilirubin ratio, ALT+AST or ALT+AST+bilirubin+INR) predicted composite outcomes (graft failure or mortality, aHR/aOR 4.37 (2.65-7.21)). Biomarkers assessed at late stage (>15) did not show association with mortality (HR/OR 1.02 (1.00-1.04)) or composite outcomes (HR/OR 1.00 (0.99-1.01)). KM-based IPD analysis showed that coagulation factor V combined with ALT predicted graft survival (HR 2.12 (1.44-3.12)), and coagulation factor V+Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 stratified the risk of patient survival (HR 2.97 (1.79-4.91)). Therefore, we were able to compare various scoring systems in predicting graft-related outcomes and mortality followed LT. Additionally, we identified novel combinations of biomarkers that exhibited prognostic value for LT patients. Finally, we demonstrate that combined analytical tools for assessing large clinical datasets effectively evaluate multi-modal markers for risk stratification of early and late outcomes for LT.

肝移植预后和诊断生物标志物:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
肝移植(LT)是终末期肝病患者的治疗选择。最近的研究探讨了生物标志物在预测移植物功能和移植后死亡率方面的预后意义,但很少有候选物被推荐用于临床实践。我们采用了整合meta分析(PRISMA 2020)的管道,然后是基于Kaplan Meier (KM)的个体患者数据(IPD)分析,旨在确定LT受体潜在的新型预后生物标志物面板。检索了Ovid Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库。21项预后研究和8项诊断研究纳入了34922例患者。早期(肝移植后≤15 d)取样的单一生物标志物与移植物相关结局显著相关(HR/OR 0.95(0.94-0.97)),但不能预测死亡率(HR/OR 1.00(0.97-1.04))或复合结局(HR/OR 1.02(0.98-1.07))。联合生物标志物(GGT/胆红素比值,ALT+AST或ALT+AST+胆红素+INR)预测复合结果(移植物失败或死亡,aHR/aOR 4.37(2.65-7.21))。晚期评估的生物标志物(bbb15)未显示与死亡率(HR/OR 1.02(1.00-1.04))或复合结局(HR/OR 1.00(0.99-1.01))相关。基于KM-based的IPD分析显示,凝血因子V联合ALT预测移植物生存(HR 2.12(1.44-3.12)),凝血因子V+胰岛素样生长因子1对患者生存风险分层(HR 2.97(1.79-4.91))。因此,我们能够比较各种评分系统在预测移植物相关结果和LT后死亡率方面的差异。此外,我们确定了对LT患者具有预后价值的生物标志物的新组合。最后,我们证明了用于评估大型临床数据集的综合分析工具有效地评估了LT早期和晚期结局的多模式风险分层标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信