Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

IF 1.5
Javier Aragón-Sánchez, Gerardo Víquez-Molina, José María Rojas-Bonilla
{"title":"Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.","authors":"Javier Aragón-Sánchez, Gerardo Víquez-Molina, José María Rojas-Bonilla","doi":"10.1177/15347346251353684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the most frequent infection in diabetes-related foot ulcers, often associated with delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk of amputation. The contribution of microbiological factors to its clinical severity remains uncertain. While severe cases are often associated with soft tissue complications such as abscesses or necrotizing infections, it is unclear whether the bacterial profile influences infection severity. This study aimed to determine whether severe presentations are associated with a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections confirmed to involve osteomyelitis through histopathological evaluation. Bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures were compared between moderate and severe cases. Among 114 patients included, 73 were classified as moderate and 41 as severe. Bone cultures were positive in 101 cases, yielding 173 isolates. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most frequently isolated species, followed by <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>. No significant differences were found between severity groups in the distribution of individual species, polymicrobial cultures (46.6% in moderate vs 56.1% in severe; p = 0.435), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%; p = 1.000). A global comparison of species distribution also showed no statistical association with severity (p = 0.941). These findings suggest that severity is not explained by the microbiological profile identified through conventional aerobic cultures. Instead, host-related or anatomical factors may be more relevant, although the lack of anaerobic cultures may have underestimated microbial diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251353684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251353684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the most frequent infection in diabetes-related foot ulcers, often associated with delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk of amputation. The contribution of microbiological factors to its clinical severity remains uncertain. While severe cases are often associated with soft tissue complications such as abscesses or necrotizing infections, it is unclear whether the bacterial profile influences infection severity. This study aimed to determine whether severe presentations are associated with a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections confirmed to involve osteomyelitis through histopathological evaluation. Bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures were compared between moderate and severe cases. Among 114 patients included, 73 were classified as moderate and 41 as severe. Bone cultures were positive in 101 cases, yielding 173 isolates. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated species, followed by Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae. No significant differences were found between severity groups in the distribution of individual species, polymicrobial cultures (46.6% in moderate vs 56.1% in severe; p = 0.435), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%; p = 1.000). A global comparison of species distribution also showed no statistical association with severity (p = 0.941). These findings suggest that severity is not explained by the microbiological profile identified through conventional aerobic cultures. Instead, host-related or anatomical factors may be more relevant, although the lack of anaerobic cultures may have underestimated microbial diversity.

骨活检微生物学不能解释糖尿病足骨髓炎的临床严重程度。
糖尿病足骨髓炎是糖尿病相关足溃疡中最常见的感染,通常与愈合延迟、住院时间延长和截肢风险增加有关。微生物因素对其临床严重程度的影响尚不确定。虽然严重的病例通常伴有软组织并发症,如脓肿或坏死性感染,但尚不清楚细菌谱是否影响感染的严重程度。本研究旨在确定严重症状是否与多微生物感染、多药耐药菌或特定细菌种类的高频率相关。我们对一组通过组织病理学评估确诊为骨髓炎的中度或重度糖尿病足感染的前瞻性队列患者进行了二次分析。从骨活检培养中分离的细菌种类在中度和重度病例中进行比较。114例患者中,73例为中度,41例为重度。101例骨培养阳性,分离173株。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离种,其次是粪肠球菌和无乳链球菌。在严重程度组之间,单个物种的分布、多微生物培养(中度46.6% vs重度56.1%;P = 0.435)或多重耐药菌(12.3% vs 12.2%;p = 1.000)。物种分布与严重程度也无统计学相关性(p = 0.941)。这些发现表明,通过常规有氧培养确定的微生物特征不能解释严重程度。相反,宿主相关或解剖因素可能更相关,尽管缺乏厌氧培养可能低估了微生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信