Micro-CT for the differentiation between live birth and stillbirth: A pilot study.

Giovanni Botta, Tullio Genova, Alessandro Bonsignore, Francesca Buffelli, Davide Mussano, Francesco Lupariello
{"title":"Micro-CT for the differentiation between live birth and stillbirth: A pilot study.","authors":"Giovanni Botta, Tullio Genova, Alessandro Bonsignore, Francesca Buffelli, Davide Mussano, Francesco Lupariello","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The distinction between live births and stillbirths is crucial for determining the appropriate legal consequences. Historically, researchers have operated under the principle that an infant's lungs will be filled with air upon death, whereas a fetus's lungs will not. The flotation test for the lungs is the primary method still used in many jurisdictions. However, there are concerns regarding its reliability. For this reason, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of postmortem micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for differentiating between formalin-fixed aerated and nonaerated lungs. Lung samples from aerated (Group 1) and nonaerated (Group 2) subjects were scanned using micro-CT. We calculated the gas volume percentage (GV%) in each sample. Group 1 (aerated lungs) showed a mean GV% of 9.52 ± 6.77, while Group 2 (nonaerated lungs) showed a mean GV% of 0.58 ± 0.66. These findings suggest that micro-CT can qualitatively and quantitatively detect pulmonary aeration and may serve as a valuable tool in forensic investigations involving suspected neonaticide, feticide, and intrauterine fetal demise.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distinction between live births and stillbirths is crucial for determining the appropriate legal consequences. Historically, researchers have operated under the principle that an infant's lungs will be filled with air upon death, whereas a fetus's lungs will not. The flotation test for the lungs is the primary method still used in many jurisdictions. However, there are concerns regarding its reliability. For this reason, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of postmortem micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for differentiating between formalin-fixed aerated and nonaerated lungs. Lung samples from aerated (Group 1) and nonaerated (Group 2) subjects were scanned using micro-CT. We calculated the gas volume percentage (GV%) in each sample. Group 1 (aerated lungs) showed a mean GV% of 9.52 ± 6.77, while Group 2 (nonaerated lungs) showed a mean GV% of 0.58 ± 0.66. These findings suggest that micro-CT can qualitatively and quantitatively detect pulmonary aeration and may serve as a valuable tool in forensic investigations involving suspected neonaticide, feticide, and intrauterine fetal demise.

显微ct鉴别活产和死产:一项初步研究。
活产和死产之间的区别对于确定适当的法律后果至关重要。从历史上看,研究人员的工作原则是,婴儿的肺在死亡时会充满空气,而胎儿的肺则不会。在许多司法管辖区,肺漂浮试验仍是主要的检测方法。然而,人们对其可靠性表示担忧。出于这个原因,我们进行了一项初步研究,以评估尸检显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)区分福尔马林固定通气和非通气肺的可行性。使用micro-CT扫描充气组(1组)和非充气组(2组)受试者的肺样本。我们计算了每个样品中的气体体积百分比(GV%)。1组(曝气肺)平均GV%为9.52±6.77,2组(未曝气肺)平均GV%为0.58±0.66。这些发现表明,微ct可以定性和定量地检测肺通气,并可作为法医调查疑似杀新生儿、杀胎儿和宫内胎儿死亡的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信