Development and validation of a combined clinical and MRI-based biomarker model to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from mild Alzheimer's disease.

IF 0.9
PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70134
Zohreh Hosseini, Alisa Mohebbi, Iman Kiani, Aydin Taghilou, Atefeh Mohammadjafari, Vajiheh Aghamollaii
{"title":"Development and validation of a combined clinical and MRI-based biomarker model to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from mild Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Zohreh Hosseini, Alisa Mohebbi, Iman Kiani, Aydin Taghilou, Atefeh Mohammadjafari, Vajiheh Aghamollaii","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two of the most common complaints seen in neurology clinics are Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), characterized by similar symptoms. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate the diagnostic value of combined neurological and radiological predictors in differentiating mild AD from MCI as the outcome variable, which helps in preventing AD development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 161 participants was conducted in a general healthcare setting, including 30 controls, 71 mild AD, and 60 MCI. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of interest, with collinearity assessment conducted prior to model development. Model performance was assessed through calibration, shrinkage, and decision-curve analyses. Finally, the combined clinical and radiological model was compared to models utilizing only clinical or radiological predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final model included age, sex, education status, Montreal cognitive assessment, Global Cerebral Atrophy Index, Medial Temporal Atrophy Scale, mean hippocampal volume, and Posterior Parietal Atrophy Index, with the area under the curve of 0.978 (0.934-0.996). Internal validation methods did not show substantial reduction in diagnostic performance. Combined model showed higher diagnostic performance compared to clinical and radiological models alone. Decision curve analysis highlighted the usefulness of this model for differentiation across all probability levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined clinical-radiological model has excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating mild AD from MCI. Notably, the model leveraged straightforward neuroimaging markers, which are relatively simple to measure and interpret, suggesting that they could be integrated into practical, formula-driven diagnostic workflows without requiring computationally intensive deep learning models.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"4 2","pages":"e70134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two of the most common complaints seen in neurology clinics are Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), characterized by similar symptoms. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate the diagnostic value of combined neurological and radiological predictors in differentiating mild AD from MCI as the outcome variable, which helps in preventing AD development.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 161 participants was conducted in a general healthcare setting, including 30 controls, 71 mild AD, and 60 MCI. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of interest, with collinearity assessment conducted prior to model development. Model performance was assessed through calibration, shrinkage, and decision-curve analyses. Finally, the combined clinical and radiological model was compared to models utilizing only clinical or radiological predictors.

Results: The final model included age, sex, education status, Montreal cognitive assessment, Global Cerebral Atrophy Index, Medial Temporal Atrophy Scale, mean hippocampal volume, and Posterior Parietal Atrophy Index, with the area under the curve of 0.978 (0.934-0.996). Internal validation methods did not show substantial reduction in diagnostic performance. Combined model showed higher diagnostic performance compared to clinical and radiological models alone. Decision curve analysis highlighted the usefulness of this model for differentiation across all probability levels.

Conclusion: A combined clinical-radiological model has excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating mild AD from MCI. Notably, the model leveraged straightforward neuroimaging markers, which are relatively simple to measure and interpret, suggesting that they could be integrated into practical, formula-driven diagnostic workflows without requiring computationally intensive deep learning models.

开发和验证基于临床和mri的生物标志物模型来区分轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病。
背景:在神经病学诊所看到的两种最常见的主诉是阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI),其特征是相似的症状。本研究的目的是开发并内部验证神经学和放射学联合预测指标作为预后变量在区分轻度AD和轻度轻度AD方面的诊断价值,这有助于预防AD的发展。方法:在普通医疗机构对161名参与者进行了横断面研究,其中包括30名对照组,71名轻度AD和60名轻度认知障碍患者。二元逻辑回归用于识别感兴趣的预测因子,并在模型开发之前进行共线性评估。通过校准、收缩和决策曲线分析来评估模型的性能。最后,将临床和放射学联合模型与仅使用临床或放射学预测因子的模型进行比较。结果:最终模型包括年龄、性别、受教育程度、蒙特利尔认知评估、全球脑萎缩指数、内侧颞叶萎缩量表、平均海马体积、后顶叶萎缩指数,曲线下面积为0.978(0.934 ~ 0.996)。内部验证方法并没有显示诊断性能的显著降低。联合模型比单独的临床和放射学模型具有更高的诊断效能。决策曲线分析强调了该模型在所有概率水平上的差异性的有用性。结论:临床-影像学联合模型对轻度AD和轻度轻度认知损伤有较好的诊断价值。值得注意的是,该模型利用了直接的神经成像标记,这些标记相对容易测量和解释,这表明它们可以集成到实用的、公式驱动的诊断工作流程中,而不需要计算密集型的深度学习模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信