Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal tuberculosis in last 5 years.

Monalisa Mohanty, Mantu Jain, Sujit Kumar Tripathy, Manisha Tripathy, Preetam Kumar Kar, Baijayantimala Mishra, Prasanta Raghab Mohapatra
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal tuberculosis in last 5 years.","authors":"Monalisa Mohanty, Mantu Jain, Sujit Kumar Tripathy, Manisha Tripathy, Preetam Kumar Kar, Baijayantimala Mishra, Prasanta Raghab Mohapatra","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal tuberculosis (TB), also known as Pott's spine, remains a significant global health issue, particularly in regions with a high TB burden. The disease presents complex challenges in diagnosis, management, and treatment, prompting a growing interest in research over recent years. The advancements in imaging, diagnostics, and treatment strategies have driven an increased focus on publishing clinical outcomes, review articles, and case series related to spinal TB (STB).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a bibliometric analysis of STB research published over the last 5 years (2019-2023) to identify trends in publication volume, contributions by country, and the nature of the research being conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using the PubMed database, focusing on research articles published between 2019 and 2023. Keywords such as \"spine tuberculosis,\" \"spinal TB,\" \"TB spine,\" and \"Pott's spine\" were utilized to capture relevant publications. Articles were analyzed based on the type of research (<i>e.g.</i>, case reports, review articles, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials [RCTs]), number of citations, and country of origin based on the corresponding author's details. Further subgroup analysis was performed according to the TB burden in various countries to assess research trends in high-burden regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 528 articles met the inclusion criteria for this bibliometric analysis. The majority of articles were published between 2020 and 2023 (440/528; 83.3%), while the lowest number was published in 2019 (88/528; 16.7%). India led the global contributions with 25.8% of the total publications, followed by China (19.9%) and the United States (10.4%). Combined, African countries contributed 6.8% of the research on STB. Regarding the type of articles, case reports and case series dominated the literature (353/528; 66.9%), followed by review articles (120/528; 22.7%) and cohort studies (45/528; 8.5%). Only 1.9% (10/528) of the studies were RCTs. Countries such as the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan have pioneered the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic processes for STB, while India, China, South Africa, and other countries have been pivotal in conducting clinical trials and improving clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This bibliometric analysis revealed a significant increase in STB research over the last 5 years, with India and China being the leading contributors. However, most publications are case reports or case series, with a limited number of RCTs. The results highlighted the need for more high-quality research, especially in terms of RCTs and innovations in diagnostic technologies. Additionally, the application of AI to STB diagnostics shows promise in developed countries, while high-burden countries are focusing on clinical trials and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"102668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.102668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal tuberculosis (TB), also known as Pott's spine, remains a significant global health issue, particularly in regions with a high TB burden. The disease presents complex challenges in diagnosis, management, and treatment, prompting a growing interest in research over recent years. The advancements in imaging, diagnostics, and treatment strategies have driven an increased focus on publishing clinical outcomes, review articles, and case series related to spinal TB (STB).

Aim: To perform a bibliometric analysis of STB research published over the last 5 years (2019-2023) to identify trends in publication volume, contributions by country, and the nature of the research being conducted.

Methods: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using the PubMed database, focusing on research articles published between 2019 and 2023. Keywords such as "spine tuberculosis," "spinal TB," "TB spine," and "Pott's spine" were utilized to capture relevant publications. Articles were analyzed based on the type of research (e.g., case reports, review articles, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials [RCTs]), number of citations, and country of origin based on the corresponding author's details. Further subgroup analysis was performed according to the TB burden in various countries to assess research trends in high-burden regions.

Results: A total of 528 articles met the inclusion criteria for this bibliometric analysis. The majority of articles were published between 2020 and 2023 (440/528; 83.3%), while the lowest number was published in 2019 (88/528; 16.7%). India led the global contributions with 25.8% of the total publications, followed by China (19.9%) and the United States (10.4%). Combined, African countries contributed 6.8% of the research on STB. Regarding the type of articles, case reports and case series dominated the literature (353/528; 66.9%), followed by review articles (120/528; 22.7%) and cohort studies (45/528; 8.5%). Only 1.9% (10/528) of the studies were RCTs. Countries such as the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan have pioneered the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic processes for STB, while India, China, South Africa, and other countries have been pivotal in conducting clinical trials and improving clinical management strategies.

Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis revealed a significant increase in STB research over the last 5 years, with India and China being the leading contributors. However, most publications are case reports or case series, with a limited number of RCTs. The results highlighted the need for more high-quality research, especially in terms of RCTs and innovations in diagnostic technologies. Additionally, the application of AI to STB diagnostics shows promise in developed countries, while high-burden countries are focusing on clinical trials and management strategies.

近5年脊柱结核研究文献计量学分析。
背景:脊柱结核(TB),也称为波特氏脊柱,仍然是一个重大的全球卫生问题,特别是在结核病负担高的地区。该疾病在诊断、管理和治疗方面提出了复杂的挑战,近年来引起了越来越多的研究兴趣。影像、诊断和治疗策略方面的进步促使人们更加关注与脊柱结核(STB)相关的临床结果、综述文章和病例系列的发表。目的:对过去5年(2019-2023年)发表的STB研究进行文献计量分析,以确定出版物数量、国家贡献和正在进行的研究性质的趋势。方法:利用PubMed数据库对2019 - 2023年发表的研究论文进行综合文献计量分析。使用“脊柱结核”、“脊柱结核”、“结核脊柱”和“波特脊柱”等关键词获取相关出版物。根据研究类型(如病例报告、综述文章、队列研究、随机对照试验[rct])、引用次数和基于通讯作者详细信息的原产国对文章进行分析。根据各国结核病负担情况进行进一步亚组分析,以评估高负担地区的研究趋势。结果:528篇文献符合文献计量学分析的纳入标准。大多数文章发表于2020年至2023年之间(440/528;83.3%),而2019年公布的数字最低(88/528;16.7%)。印度以25.8%的全球贡献领先,其次是中国(19.9%)和美国(10.4%)。非洲国家合计贡献了对STB研究的6.8%。在文章类型方面,病例报告和病例系列文献占主导地位(353/528;66.9%),其次是综述文章(120/528;22.7%)和队列研究(45/528;8.5%)。只有1.9%(10/528)的研究是随机对照试验。美国、德国、英国和日本等国家率先在STB诊断过程中使用人工智能(AI),而印度、中国、南非等国家在开展临床试验和改进临床管理策略方面发挥了关键作用。结论:这一文献计量分析显示,在过去5年中,STB研究显著增加,其中印度和中国是主要贡献者。然而,大多数出版物是病例报告或病例系列,随机对照试验数量有限。结果强调需要更多高质量的研究,特别是在随机对照试验和诊断技术创新方面。此外,人工智能在STB诊断中的应用在发达国家显示出前景,而高负担国家则将重点放在临床试验和管理战略上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信