Cardiac vagal recovery following acute psychological stress in human adults: A scoping review.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Charlotte M Roddick, Yeon Soo Christine Seo, Shan-Li Barkovich, Luke Forrester, Frances S Chen
{"title":"Cardiac vagal recovery following acute psychological stress in human adults: A scoping review.","authors":"Charlotte M Roddick, Yeon Soo Christine Seo, Shan-Li Barkovich, Luke Forrester, Frances S Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) recovery following acute psychological stress reflects parasympathetic function and stress resilience, yet there is no synthesis on how it is measured and influenced by key factors. This scoping review mapped methodologies used to assess vmHRV recovery and examined clinical, demographic, psychological, physiological and environmental influences. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases identified empirical peer-reviewed studies on cardiac vagal recovery in adults published since 2000 that reported vmHRV post-stress. Key data, including recovery operationalization, stressor types, and factors influencing recovery, were extracted and synthesized. A total of 291 journal articles, covering 294 studies (N = 23,533 participants across 33 countries; 56.1% female), met inclusion criteria. Evidence indicated that enhanced vmHRV recovery was associated with greater levels of resilience, attentional control, habitual use of cognitive reappraisal, and exposure to nature elements. In contrast, blunted vmHRV recovery was linked with clinical depression, cardiovascular disease risk, and emotion dysregulation. Methodological challenges included variability in recovery timing (e.g., 5- vs. 30-minute windows) and inconsistent reporting of recovery conditions (e.g., posture). Aggregation of recovery data across dissimilar stressors without justification also contributed to interpretation issues. This review highlights substantial variability in how vmHRV recovery is measured and reported, limiting comparability across studies. Core recommendations include justifying recovery timing, standardizing recovery conditions, and prioritizing non-normalized vmHRV metrics to improve consistency. These methodological improvements will enhance cross-study comparisons, facilitate meta-analyses, and advance understanding of the role of cardiac vagal recovery in stress resilience and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"106268"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) recovery following acute psychological stress reflects parasympathetic function and stress resilience, yet there is no synthesis on how it is measured and influenced by key factors. This scoping review mapped methodologies used to assess vmHRV recovery and examined clinical, demographic, psychological, physiological and environmental influences. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE databases identified empirical peer-reviewed studies on cardiac vagal recovery in adults published since 2000 that reported vmHRV post-stress. Key data, including recovery operationalization, stressor types, and factors influencing recovery, were extracted and synthesized. A total of 291 journal articles, covering 294 studies (N = 23,533 participants across 33 countries; 56.1% female), met inclusion criteria. Evidence indicated that enhanced vmHRV recovery was associated with greater levels of resilience, attentional control, habitual use of cognitive reappraisal, and exposure to nature elements. In contrast, blunted vmHRV recovery was linked with clinical depression, cardiovascular disease risk, and emotion dysregulation. Methodological challenges included variability in recovery timing (e.g., 5- vs. 30-minute windows) and inconsistent reporting of recovery conditions (e.g., posture). Aggregation of recovery data across dissimilar stressors without justification also contributed to interpretation issues. This review highlights substantial variability in how vmHRV recovery is measured and reported, limiting comparability across studies. Core recommendations include justifying recovery timing, standardizing recovery conditions, and prioritizing non-normalized vmHRV metrics to improve consistency. These methodological improvements will enhance cross-study comparisons, facilitate meta-analyses, and advance understanding of the role of cardiac vagal recovery in stress resilience and health outcomes.

成人急性心理应激后心脏迷走神经恢复:范围综述。
急性心理应激后迷走神经介导的心率变异性(vmHRV)恢复反映副交感神经功能和应激恢复力,但如何测量和受关键因素影响尚无综合研究。这一范围审查绘制了用于评估vmHRV恢复的方法,并检查了临床、人口、心理、生理和环境影响。遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,综合检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO和EMBASE数据库,确定了自2000年以来发表的关于应激后vmHRV的成人心脏迷走神经恢复的经验同行评审研究。提取并综合了关键数据,包括采收率操作、应力源类型和影响采收率的因素。共有291篇期刊文章,涵盖294项研究(N = 23,533名参与者,来自33个国家;56.1%女性),符合纳入标准。有证据表明,vmHRV恢复的增强与更高水平的恢复力、注意力控制、习惯性使用认知重新评估和接触自然因素有关。相反,vmHRV恢复迟钝与临床抑郁、心血管疾病风险和情绪失调有关。方法学上的挑战包括恢复时间的可变性(例如,5分钟和30分钟的窗口)和不一致的恢复条件报告(例如,姿势)。在没有正当理由的情况下,汇总不同压力源的恢复数据也导致了解释问题。本综述强调了vmHRV恢复的测量和报告方式存在很大差异,限制了研究之间的可比性。核心建议包括合理的恢复时间,标准化的恢复条件,优先考虑非标准化的vmHRV指标,以提高一致性。这些方法学的改进将加强交叉研究比较,促进荟萃分析,并促进对心脏迷走神经恢复在应激恢复和健康结果中的作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信