Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Ethan Nyein, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ann Tran, Rajveer S Purohit
{"title":"Impact of vaginectomy technique on the outcomes of transmasculine gender affirming surgery.","authors":"Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Ethan Nyein, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ann Tran, Rajveer S Purohit","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal approach for vaginectomy in transmasculinizing surgery is not well-defined, with options for sharp excision of vaginal epithelium or electrocautery fulguration of the vaginal mucosa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of excisional and fulguration vaginectomy approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent transmasculine surgery from 2021 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. All patients had vaginectomy with metoidioplasty.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Post-operative complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), and operating room (OR) time were compared between excision and fulguration techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 70 patients, 50 (71%) had epithelial excision and 20 (29%) had fulguration. Both groups had identical rates of post-operative vagino-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Vaginal remnant recurrence occurred in four patients (8%) in the excision group and one patient (5%) in the fulguration group (P = 0.67). Repeat vaginectomy was required in 2% of the excision group and 5% of the fulguration group (P = 0.50). In patients without hysterectomy, mean EBL was 254 mL in the excision group vs. 88 mL in the fulguration group (P < 0.01). Mean OR time was 290 minutes for excision compared to 183 minutes for fulguration (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study identifies a safe and effective approach to vaginectomy technique that is not standardized in transmasculine surgery.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>A strength of our study is that it directly compares outcomes of the excisional approach and fulguration approach to vaginectomy. Limitations include its retrospective nature and that surgical technique was determined by surgeon preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that a complete fulguration approach, when compared to an epithelial excision approach, reduces blood loss and OR time without compromising rates of vagino-cutaneous fistulae or vaginal remnants requiring re-operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The optimal approach for vaginectomy in transmasculinizing surgery is not well-defined, with options for sharp excision of vaginal epithelium or electrocautery fulguration of the vaginal mucosa.
Aim: This study compares the outcomes of excisional and fulguration vaginectomy approaches.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent transmasculine surgery from 2021 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. All patients had vaginectomy with metoidioplasty.
Outcomes: Post-operative complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), and operating room (OR) time were compared between excision and fulguration techniques.
Results: Of 70 patients, 50 (71%) had epithelial excision and 20 (29%) had fulguration. Both groups had identical rates of post-operative vagino-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Vaginal remnant recurrence occurred in four patients (8%) in the excision group and one patient (5%) in the fulguration group (P = 0.67). Repeat vaginectomy was required in 2% of the excision group and 5% of the fulguration group (P = 0.50). In patients without hysterectomy, mean EBL was 254 mL in the excision group vs. 88 mL in the fulguration group (P < 0.01). Mean OR time was 290 minutes for excision compared to 183 minutes for fulguration (P < 0.01).
Clinical implications: This study identifies a safe and effective approach to vaginectomy technique that is not standardized in transmasculine surgery.
Strengths and limitations: A strength of our study is that it directly compares outcomes of the excisional approach and fulguration approach to vaginectomy. Limitations include its retrospective nature and that surgical technique was determined by surgeon preference.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that a complete fulguration approach, when compared to an epithelial excision approach, reduces blood loss and OR time without compromising rates of vagino-cutaneous fistulae or vaginal remnants requiring re-operation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine.
The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.