Impact of vaginectomy technique on the outcomes of transmasculine gender affirming surgery.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Ethan Nyein, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ann Tran, Rajveer S Purohit
{"title":"Impact of vaginectomy technique on the outcomes of transmasculine gender affirming surgery.","authors":"Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Ethan Nyein, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ann Tran, Rajveer S Purohit","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal approach for vaginectomy in transmasculinizing surgery is not well-defined, with options for sharp excision of vaginal epithelium or electrocautery fulguration of the vaginal mucosa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of excisional and fulguration vaginectomy approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent transmasculine surgery from 2021 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. All patients had vaginectomy with metoidioplasty.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Post-operative complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), and operating room (OR) time were compared between excision and fulguration techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 70 patients, 50 (71%) had epithelial excision and 20 (29%) had fulguration. Both groups had identical rates of post-operative vagino-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Vaginal remnant recurrence occurred in four patients (8%) in the excision group and one patient (5%) in the fulguration group (P = 0.67). Repeat vaginectomy was required in 2% of the excision group and 5% of the fulguration group (P = 0.50). In patients without hysterectomy, mean EBL was 254 mL in the excision group vs. 88 mL in the fulguration group (P < 0.01). Mean OR time was 290 minutes for excision compared to 183 minutes for fulguration (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study identifies a safe and effective approach to vaginectomy technique that is not standardized in transmasculine surgery.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>A strength of our study is that it directly compares outcomes of the excisional approach and fulguration approach to vaginectomy. Limitations include its retrospective nature and that surgical technique was determined by surgeon preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that a complete fulguration approach, when compared to an epithelial excision approach, reduces blood loss and OR time without compromising rates of vagino-cutaneous fistulae or vaginal remnants requiring re-operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal approach for vaginectomy in transmasculinizing surgery is not well-defined, with options for sharp excision of vaginal epithelium or electrocautery fulguration of the vaginal mucosa.

Aim: This study compares the outcomes of excisional and fulguration vaginectomy approaches.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent transmasculine surgery from 2021 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. All patients had vaginectomy with metoidioplasty.

Outcomes: Post-operative complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), and operating room (OR) time were compared between excision and fulguration techniques.

Results: Of 70 patients, 50 (71%) had epithelial excision and 20 (29%) had fulguration. Both groups had identical rates of post-operative vagino-cutaneous fistulae (10%). Vaginal remnant recurrence occurred in four patients (8%) in the excision group and one patient (5%) in the fulguration group (P = 0.67). Repeat vaginectomy was required in 2% of the excision group and 5% of the fulguration group (P = 0.50). In patients without hysterectomy, mean EBL was 254 mL in the excision group vs. 88 mL in the fulguration group (P < 0.01). Mean OR time was 290 minutes for excision compared to 183 minutes for fulguration (P < 0.01).

Clinical implications: This study identifies a safe and effective approach to vaginectomy technique that is not standardized in transmasculine surgery.

Strengths and limitations: A strength of our study is that it directly compares outcomes of the excisional approach and fulguration approach to vaginectomy. Limitations include its retrospective nature and that surgical technique was determined by surgeon preference.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that a complete fulguration approach, when compared to an epithelial excision approach, reduces blood loss and OR time without compromising rates of vagino-cutaneous fistulae or vaginal remnants requiring re-operation.

阴道切除术技术对跨男性性别确认手术结果的影响。
背景:经男性化手术中阴道切除术的最佳方法尚不明确,可选择阴道上皮的尖锐切除或阴道粘膜的电灼。目的:比较阴道切除术与电灼切除术的效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年至2023年在单一机构接受变性手术的患者。所有患者均行阴道切除术及子宫内膜成形术。结果:比较了切除和电灼术的术后并发症、估计失血量(EBL)和手术室(OR)时间。结果:70例患者中,上皮切除50例(71%),电灼20例(29%)。两组术后阴道-皮肤瘘发生率相同(10%)。切除组4例(8%)出现阴道残余复发,电灼组1例(5%)出现阴道残余复发(P = 0.67)。切除组和电灼组分别有2%和5%的患者需要重复阴道切除术(P = 0.50)。未切除子宫的患者,切除组平均EBL为254 mL,电灼组平均EBL为88 mL (P < 0.01)。切除组平均手术时间290分钟,电灼组平均手术时间183分钟(P < 0.01)。临床意义:本研究确定了一种安全有效的阴道切除术技术,该技术在跨男性手术中尚未标准化。优势和局限性:我们研究的优势在于它直接比较了阴道切除术的切除入路和电灼入路的结果。局限性包括其回顾性和手术技术取决于外科医生的偏好。结论:我们的数据表明,与上皮切除入路相比,完全电灼入路可以减少出血量和手术时间,而不会影响阴道皮肤瘘或阴道残余需要再次手术的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Journal of Sexual Medicine 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research. The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine. The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信