[Legitimation and criticism of community psychiatry: concomitant phenomena and sequelae of a long-term model project].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Heiner Fangerau
{"title":"[Legitimation and criticism of community psychiatry: concomitant phenomena and sequelae of a long-term model project].","authors":"Heiner Fangerau","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01851-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes the development and criticism of community psychiatry in Germany since the 1975 Inquiry Commission on Psychiatry as well as its precursors and reference points. While the inquiry called for fundamental reforms such as the establishment of community-based care structures, the concrete content and structural guidelines remained vague. This lack of clarity meant that community psychiatry was characterized less by central reforms than by a large number of regional model projects. With a view to the historical context, this project orientation is interpreted as an expression of a shift in focus since the 1980s towards self-help, civil society actors and the flexibilization of the social state. Although projectification has led to diversification and professionalization, it has also resulted in uncertainty, lack of sustainability and fragmentation of care. Community psychiatry is thus seen as a mirror of social and political change.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01851-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the development and criticism of community psychiatry in Germany since the 1975 Inquiry Commission on Psychiatry as well as its precursors and reference points. While the inquiry called for fundamental reforms such as the establishment of community-based care structures, the concrete content and structural guidelines remained vague. This lack of clarity meant that community psychiatry was characterized less by central reforms than by a large number of regional model projects. With a view to the historical context, this project orientation is interpreted as an expression of a shift in focus since the 1980s towards self-help, civil society actors and the flexibilization of the social state. Although projectification has led to diversification and professionalization, it has also resulted in uncertainty, lack of sustainability and fragmentation of care. Community psychiatry is thus seen as a mirror of social and political change.

[社区精神病学的合法化和批评:长期模式项目的伴随现象和后遗症]。
本文描述了自1975年精神病学调查委员会成立以来,德国社区精神病学的发展和批评,以及它的先驱和参考点。虽然调查要求进行基本改革,例如建立以社区为基础的护理结构,但具体内容和结构指导方针仍然含糊不清。这种缺乏明确性意味着社区精神病学的特点不是中央改革,而是大量的区域示范项目。从历史背景来看,这个项目的方向被解释为自20世纪80年代以来重点转向自助、公民社会行动者和社会状态的灵活性的表达。虽然项目化导致了多样化和专业化,但它也造成了不确定性、缺乏可持续性和护理的碎片化。因此,社区精神病学被视为社会和政治变化的一面镜子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信