Associations between childhood interactions with people of Black race/ethnicity and racial implicit association tasks in psychiatric providers in the United States - a cross-sectional study.

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Victor J Avila-Quintero, Katie Malison, Miciah Wilkerson, José M Flores, Jerome H Taylor, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Michael H Bloch, Amalia Londoño Tobón
{"title":"Associations between childhood interactions with people of Black race/ethnicity and racial implicit association tasks in psychiatric providers in the United States - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Victor J Avila-Quintero, Katie Malison, Miciah Wilkerson, José M Flores, Jerome H Taylor, Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger, Michael H Bloch, Amalia Londoño Tobón","doi":"10.1111/camh.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We estimated associations between psychiatric providers' self-reported amount and valence of interaction with individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood and three implicit association tests (IATs) scores. Valence of interaction refers to the positive or negative nature of childhood interactions, capturing whether these interactions were reported as generally favorable or unfavorable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, psychiatric providers and trainees reported the amount and valence of interaction with (1) individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood, (2) colleagues, and (3) patients of Black race/ethnicity during medical practice. Providers also completed three IATs pairing Black or White faces and terms about psychiatric diagnosis, compliance, and treatment. Linear and logistic regression models estimated relationships between IAT D-scores and ratings of interaction amount and valence with individuals of Black race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 294 providers (medical students, residents, fellows, and board-certified psychiatrists), increased self-reported amount (β<sub>Δ Compliance</sub> = -.08, p < .01 and β<sub>Δ Treatment</sub> = -.09, p < .001) and valence (β<sub>Δ Compliance</sub> = -.08, p < .01 and β<sub>Δ Treatment</sub> = -.08, p < .01) of childhood interaction with individuals of Black race/ethnicity were significantly associated with lower D-scores on IAT tasks. In contrast, ratings of amount and valence of recent interaction with colleagues and patients of Black race/ethnicity were not statistically associated with IAT D-scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While amount and valence of interaction between providers and individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood were associated with lower implicit association scores, recent interactions with colleagues and patients of Black race/ethnicity were not significantly associated with implicit associations. Emerging research suggest that lower IAT D-scores may be associated with more unbiased behaviors and decisions in clinical settings. Considering this, our findings suggest that early-life interactions with individuals of Black race/ethnicity may influence implicit biases in adulthood, with potential implications for reducing racial disparities in psychiatric care. However, further research is needed to confirm these relationships and fully understand their impact in clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We estimated associations between psychiatric providers' self-reported amount and valence of interaction with individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood and three implicit association tests (IATs) scores. Valence of interaction refers to the positive or negative nature of childhood interactions, capturing whether these interactions were reported as generally favorable or unfavorable.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, psychiatric providers and trainees reported the amount and valence of interaction with (1) individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood, (2) colleagues, and (3) patients of Black race/ethnicity during medical practice. Providers also completed three IATs pairing Black or White faces and terms about psychiatric diagnosis, compliance, and treatment. Linear and logistic regression models estimated relationships between IAT D-scores and ratings of interaction amount and valence with individuals of Black race/ethnicity.

Results: Among 294 providers (medical students, residents, fellows, and board-certified psychiatrists), increased self-reported amount (βΔ Compliance = -.08, p < .01 and βΔ Treatment = -.09, p < .001) and valence (βΔ Compliance = -.08, p < .01 and βΔ Treatment = -.08, p < .01) of childhood interaction with individuals of Black race/ethnicity were significantly associated with lower D-scores on IAT tasks. In contrast, ratings of amount and valence of recent interaction with colleagues and patients of Black race/ethnicity were not statistically associated with IAT D-scores.

Conclusions: While amount and valence of interaction between providers and individuals of Black race/ethnicity during childhood were associated with lower implicit association scores, recent interactions with colleagues and patients of Black race/ethnicity were not significantly associated with implicit associations. Emerging research suggest that lower IAT D-scores may be associated with more unbiased behaviors and decisions in clinical settings. Considering this, our findings suggest that early-life interactions with individuals of Black race/ethnicity may influence implicit biases in adulthood, with potential implications for reducing racial disparities in psychiatric care. However, further research is needed to confirm these relationships and fully understand their impact in clinical contexts.

美国精神科医生儿童时期与黑人的互动与种族内隐联想任务之间的关联——一项横断面研究。
背景:我们估计了精神科医生自述的童年时期与黑人个体互动的数量和效价与三项内隐联想测验(IATs)分数之间的关联。互动效价指的是童年互动的积极或消极性质,捕捉这些互动是否被报道为普遍有利或不利。方法:在一项横断面研究中,精神科提供者和受训者报告了(1)儿童时期与黑人个体、(2)同事和(3)医疗实践中与黑人患者互动的数量和效价。提供者还完成了三份将黑人或白人面孔与精神病诊断、依从性和治疗相关术语进行配对的IATs。线性和逻辑回归模型估计了IAT d得分与黑人个体相互作用数量和效价评级之间的关系。结果:294名医疗服务提供者(医学生、住院医师、研究员和委员会认证的精神科医生)中,自我报告数量增加(βΔ依从性= -)。08、p Δ治疗= -。09、p Δ依从性= -。08、p Δ治疗= -。08, p结论:虽然儿童时期医疗服务提供者和黑人个体之间互动的数量和效价与较低的内隐关联得分相关,但近期与同事和黑人患者之间的互动与内隐关联没有显著相关。新兴研究表明,较低的IAT d得分可能与临床环境中更公正的行为和决策有关。考虑到这一点,我们的研究结果表明,早期与黑人/种族个体的互动可能会影响成年后的内隐偏见,这对减少精神科护理中的种族差异具有潜在的意义。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些关系,并充分了解它们在临床环境中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信