Measuring Psychological Distress and Flourishing Among University Students: Initial Findings From One Health-Promoting University.

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Abigail Seo-Youn Dubovi, Julie Edwards
{"title":"Measuring Psychological Distress and Flourishing Among University Students: Initial Findings From One Health-Promoting University.","authors":"Abigail Seo-Youn Dubovi, Julie Edwards","doi":"10.1177/15248399251348164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined baseline scores and health disparities on psychological distress, flourishing, and six flourishing domains among a diverse sample of undergraduate, graduate, and professional students as part of a comprehensive evaluation model for a health-promoting campus. The study offers a real-world approach to measuring student well-being with a focus on health equity. Participants (N = 1,019) completed an online survey including the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Flourishing Measure-12 (FM), and demographic variables. In the sample, 30%, 39%, and 26% of students screened positive for psychological distress, anxiety, and depression, respectively. Notably, 58% were classified as \"flourishing\" or \"ready to start flourishing,\" highlighting the prevalence of flourishing among students in the face of distress. Results revealed significant group differences in distress and flourishing by gender identity, race, sexual orientation, and disability status. Students' scores on distress and flourishing significantly improved after finals, supporting the impact of semester timing on well-being. Findings support the utility of distress and flourishing as key well-being indicators and the need for systems-level, equity-focused approaches to address health disparities in campus settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251348164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251348164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined baseline scores and health disparities on psychological distress, flourishing, and six flourishing domains among a diverse sample of undergraduate, graduate, and professional students as part of a comprehensive evaluation model for a health-promoting campus. The study offers a real-world approach to measuring student well-being with a focus on health equity. Participants (N = 1,019) completed an online survey including the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Flourishing Measure-12 (FM), and demographic variables. In the sample, 30%, 39%, and 26% of students screened positive for psychological distress, anxiety, and depression, respectively. Notably, 58% were classified as "flourishing" or "ready to start flourishing," highlighting the prevalence of flourishing among students in the face of distress. Results revealed significant group differences in distress and flourishing by gender identity, race, sexual orientation, and disability status. Students' scores on distress and flourishing significantly improved after finals, supporting the impact of semester timing on well-being. Findings support the utility of distress and flourishing as key well-being indicators and the need for systems-level, equity-focused approaches to address health disparities in campus settings.

衡量大学生的心理困扰与繁荣:一所促进健康的大学的初步发现。
本研究以本科生、研究生和专业学生为样本,考察了心理困扰、繁荣和六个繁荣领域的基线得分和健康差异,作为促进健康校园综合评估模型的一部分。这项研究提供了一种现实世界的方法来衡量学生的健康状况,重点是健康公平。参与者(N = 1,019)完成了一项在线调查,包括患者健康问卷-4 (PHQ-4),繁荣测量-12 (FM)和人口统计变量。在样本中,分别有30%、39%和26%的学生在心理困扰、焦虑和抑郁方面呈阳性。值得注意的是,58%的人被归类为“蓬勃发展”或“准备开始蓬勃发展”,这突显了在面临困境的学生中蓬勃发展的普遍性。结果显示,不同性别认同、种族、性取向和残疾状况的群体在痛苦和繁荣方面存在显著差异。期末考试后,学生的焦虑和繁荣得分显著提高,支持学期时间对幸福感的影响。研究结果支持将痛苦和繁荣作为关键福祉指标的效用,以及需要系统级、以公平为重点的方法来解决校园环境中的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信