Empowering Influencers to Support Harm Reduction: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of Appalachian Influence.

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erika Bonnevie, Fatma Diouf, Jeffrey Sykes, Kaitlyn Rhoads
{"title":"Empowering Influencers to Support Harm Reduction: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of Appalachian Influence.","authors":"Erika Bonnevie, Fatma Diouf, Jeffrey Sykes, Kaitlyn Rhoads","doi":"10.1177/15248399251350609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Harm reduction is a public health approach focused on minimizing the negative consequences of drug use, with syringe services programs (SSPs) playing a key role by offering sterile syringes, naloxone distribution, and connections to broader social services. Despite their effectiveness, SSPs often face stigma and misconceptions, making it crucial to address these barriers to promote supportive policies and community acceptance. This study explores the role of social media influencers in promoting harm reduction and SSPs within the Appalachian regions of West Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky through the Appalachian Influence intervention. The intervention engaged 67 local influencers to disseminate evidence-based messages about harm reduction. A mixed-methods approach was used to understand influencer perceptions of their own engagement in Appalachian Influence, including interviews, surveys, and sentiment analysis of comments on influencers' social media posts. Findings reveal that influencers valued the educational resources provided, which increased their confidence and ability to communicate complex harm reduction topics. The flexibility to personalize content was also appreciated, resulting in high levels of engagement and positive audience reception. Sentiment analysis of 589 comments from 65 posts showed that 82.9% were positive, indicating general support for the messages. The study highlights the potential to use influencers to promote public health messages. Implications for practice include the importance of providing influencers with ongoing support and educational materials, fostering a collaborative environment, and monitoring public sentiment to address misconceptions. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of influencer engagement in health communication programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251350609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251350609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harm reduction is a public health approach focused on minimizing the negative consequences of drug use, with syringe services programs (SSPs) playing a key role by offering sterile syringes, naloxone distribution, and connections to broader social services. Despite their effectiveness, SSPs often face stigma and misconceptions, making it crucial to address these barriers to promote supportive policies and community acceptance. This study explores the role of social media influencers in promoting harm reduction and SSPs within the Appalachian regions of West Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky through the Appalachian Influence intervention. The intervention engaged 67 local influencers to disseminate evidence-based messages about harm reduction. A mixed-methods approach was used to understand influencer perceptions of their own engagement in Appalachian Influence, including interviews, surveys, and sentiment analysis of comments on influencers' social media posts. Findings reveal that influencers valued the educational resources provided, which increased their confidence and ability to communicate complex harm reduction topics. The flexibility to personalize content was also appreciated, resulting in high levels of engagement and positive audience reception. Sentiment analysis of 589 comments from 65 posts showed that 82.9% were positive, indicating general support for the messages. The study highlights the potential to use influencers to promote public health messages. Implications for practice include the importance of providing influencers with ongoing support and educational materials, fostering a collaborative environment, and monitoring public sentiment to address misconceptions. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of influencer engagement in health communication programs.

授权影响者支持减少危害:阿巴拉契亚影响的混合方法过程评估。
减少危害是一项公共卫生措施,重点是尽量减少药物使用的负面后果,注射器服务规划(ssp)通过提供无菌注射器、分发纳洛酮以及与更广泛的社会服务联系发挥关键作用。尽管ssp很有效,但它们经常面临耻辱和误解,因此解决这些障碍以促进支持性政策和社区接受至关重要。本研究通过阿巴拉契亚影响干预,探讨了社交媒体影响者在促进西弗吉尼亚州、田纳西州和肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区减少伤害和ssp方面的作用。67名当地影响者参与了干预行动,传播有关减少伤害的循证信息。采用混合方法来了解影响者对自己参与阿巴拉契亚影响力的看法,包括访谈、调查和对影响者社交媒体帖子评论的情绪分析。调查结果显示,影响者重视所提供的教育资源,这增加了他们传达复杂的减少伤害主题的信心和能力。个性化内容的灵活性也受到赞赏,从而产生了高水平的参与度和积极的受众接受。对65篇帖子的589条评论的情绪分析显示,82.9%的评论是积极的,表明人们普遍支持这些消息。该研究强调了利用影响者促进公共卫生信息的潜力。对实践的影响包括为影响者提供持续支持和教育材料的重要性,培养合作环境,以及监测公众情绪以消除误解。未来的研究应该探索影响者参与健康传播计划的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信