Effects of respiratory physiotherapeutic interventions on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters and pain in newborns: A systematic review.

0 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.29390/001c.140878
Adriele de Morais Nunes, Ana Tereza Nascimento Sales Figueiredo Fernandes, Adyna Tévina de Castro Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Karolinne Souza Monteiro, Silvana Alves Pereira
{"title":"Effects of respiratory physiotherapeutic interventions on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters and pain in newborns: A systematic review.","authors":"Adriele de Morais Nunes, Ana Tereza Nascimento Sales Figueiredo Fernandes, Adyna Tévina de Castro Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Karolinne Souza Monteiro, Silvana Alves Pereira","doi":"10.29390/001c.140878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters, and pain in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods and analyses: </strong>Databases including PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. Randomized clinical trials comparing conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy in newborns (1 hour to 28 days) in neonatal intensive care units were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed bias using the PEDro scale. Data were presented as mean, standard deviation, median, and quartiles. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to incomplete post-intervention data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5,653 articles found, four were included. Two studies reported major increases in peripheral oxygen saturation after both respiratory physiotherapy techniques, a third showed decreased respiratory rate, and a fourth showed increased heart rate. Neither conventional nor non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy was suggested to cause pain in participants. No study evaluated lung mechanics parameters. The methodological quality of the included studies was predominantly moderate. Only one study exhibited low methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy techniques showed no adverse effects on vital signs or pain in NICU newborns. Further clinical trials are encouraged to assess lung function more comprehensively. Future studies should include short- and long-term evaluations of lung mechanics, respiratory distress, and pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":39373,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","volume":"61 ","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.140878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters, and pain in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit.

Methods and analyses: Databases including PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. Randomized clinical trials comparing conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy in newborns (1 hour to 28 days) in neonatal intensive care units were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed bias using the PEDro scale. Data were presented as mean, standard deviation, median, and quartiles. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to incomplete post-intervention data.

Results: Out of 5,653 articles found, four were included. Two studies reported major increases in peripheral oxygen saturation after both respiratory physiotherapy techniques, a third showed decreased respiratory rate, and a fourth showed increased heart rate. Neither conventional nor non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy was suggested to cause pain in participants. No study evaluated lung mechanics parameters. The methodological quality of the included studies was predominantly moderate. Only one study exhibited low methodological quality.

Conclusion: Both conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy techniques showed no adverse effects on vital signs or pain in NICU newborns. Further clinical trials are encouraged to assess lung function more comprehensively. Future studies should include short- and long-term evaluations of lung mechanics, respiratory distress, and pain.

呼吸物理治疗干预对新生儿肺力学、生命参数和疼痛的影响:系统综述。
目的:评价常规和非常规呼吸物理治疗对新生儿重症监护病房新生儿肺力学、生命参数和疼痛的影响。方法与分析:检索PubMed、LILACS、SciELO、Science Direct、Cochrane Library、Web of Science等数据库。纳入了比较新生儿重症监护病房(1小时至28天)新生儿常规和非传统呼吸物理治疗的随机临床试验。两位审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,并使用PEDro量表评估偏倚。数据以平均值、标准差、中位数和四分位数表示。由于干预后数据不完整,meta分析不可行。结果:在发现的5653篇文章中,有4篇被纳入。两项研究报告了两种呼吸物理治疗技术后外周氧饱和度的显著增加,第三项研究显示呼吸速率降低,第四项研究显示心率增加。常规或非常规呼吸物理治疗均未引起参与者疼痛。没有研究评估肺力学参数。纳入研究的方法学质量主要为中等。只有一项研究的方法学质量较低。结论:常规和非常规呼吸物理治疗对新生儿新生儿生命体征和疼痛均无不良影响。鼓励进一步的临床试验更全面地评估肺功能。未来的研究应包括对肺力学、呼吸窘迫和疼痛的短期和长期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The CJRT is published four times a year and represents the interests of respiratory therapists nationally and internationally. The CJRT has been redesigned to act as an educational dissemination tool. The CJRT encourages submission of original articles, papers, commentaries, case studies, literature reviews and directed reading papers. Submissions can be sent to Rita Hansen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信