The mental health and psychological wellbeing of South African athletes and coaches during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from their health experience.

Q3 Health Professions
South African Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a16401
R L van Niekerk, K Tsebe
{"title":"The mental health and psychological wellbeing of South African athletes and coaches during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from their health experience.","authors":"R L van Niekerk, K Tsebe","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a16401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, athletes' and coaches' participation in sport was restricted severely.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explore the mental health and wellbeing of athletes and coaches in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of adjusted level 3 lockdown in February 2021. At the time, participants were restricted from engaging in sports activities for a year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 135 athletes (mean age= 36.2±16.8) and 110 coaches (mean age=44.0±14.0) from 37 sporting codes participated in the study. They were invited via their federations to complete the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and Mental Health Continuum - Short Form. Descriptive results, correlations and group differences were determined. A direct logistic regression was done to predict psychological distress for athletes and coaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological distress was observed for athletes (46%) and coaches (47%), while 45% of athletes and 46% of coaches were flourishing under conditions of the pandemic. The social wellbeing of more athletes' (25%) and coaches' (28%) was disrupted than their emotional and psychological wellbeing during lockdown. The mental wellbeing of athletes (OR=0.86; CI 95%=0.81-0.91: p=0.0001) and coaches (OR=0.93; CI 95%=0.89-0.97: p=0.0001) seemed to mitigate their psychological distress, while female athletes (OR=4.97; CI 95%=1.62-15.18: p=0.005) were almost five times more likely to experience psychological distress than male athletes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of the participating athletes and coaches showed high psychological distress, while high mental wellbeing seemed to protect athletes and coaches from negative mental health outcomes during the pandemic. Female athletes and coaches were identified as high-risk groups for mental health challenges during lockdown conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"v37i1a16401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2025/v37i1a16401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, athletes' and coaches' participation in sport was restricted severely.

Objectives: This study explore the mental health and wellbeing of athletes and coaches in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of adjusted level 3 lockdown in February 2021. At the time, participants were restricted from engaging in sports activities for a year.

Methods: A convenience sample of 135 athletes (mean age= 36.2±16.8) and 110 coaches (mean age=44.0±14.0) from 37 sporting codes participated in the study. They were invited via their federations to complete the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and Mental Health Continuum - Short Form. Descriptive results, correlations and group differences were determined. A direct logistic regression was done to predict psychological distress for athletes and coaches.

Results: Psychological distress was observed for athletes (46%) and coaches (47%), while 45% of athletes and 46% of coaches were flourishing under conditions of the pandemic. The social wellbeing of more athletes' (25%) and coaches' (28%) was disrupted than their emotional and psychological wellbeing during lockdown. The mental wellbeing of athletes (OR=0.86; CI 95%=0.81-0.91: p=0.0001) and coaches (OR=0.93; CI 95%=0.89-0.97: p=0.0001) seemed to mitigate their psychological distress, while female athletes (OR=4.97; CI 95%=1.62-15.18: p=0.005) were almost five times more likely to experience psychological distress than male athletes.

Conclusion: Almost half of the participating athletes and coaches showed high psychological distress, while high mental wellbeing seemed to protect athletes and coaches from negative mental health outcomes during the pandemic. Female athletes and coaches were identified as high-risk groups for mental health challenges during lockdown conditions.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间南非运动员和教练的精神健康和心理健康:从他们的健康经验中吸取的教训。
背景:疫情防控期间,运动员和教练员参加体育活动受到严格限制。目的:本研究探讨了2021年2月调整后的3级封锁结束时,2019冠状病毒病大流行期间南非运动员和教练的心理健康和福祉。当时,参与者被限制在一年内不得参加体育活动。方法:选取来自37个体育项目的135名运动员(平均年龄= 36.2±16.8)和110名教练员(平均年龄=44.0±14.0)作为方便样本。他们被邀请通过他们的联盟完成凯斯勒心理困扰量表和心理健康连续-简短形式。确定描述性结果、相关性和组间差异。采用直接logistic回归对运动员和教练员的心理困扰进行预测。结果:运动员(46%)和教练员(47%)存在心理困扰,而45%的运动员和46%的教练员在疫情条件下表现良好。在封锁期间,更多的运动员(25%)和教练(28%)的社会福祉受到干扰,而不是他们的情绪和心理健康。运动员心理健康状况(OR=0.86;CI 95%=0.81-0.91: p=0.0001)和教练员(OR=0.93;CI 95%=0.89-0.97: p=0.0001)似乎减轻了他们的心理困扰,而女运动员(OR=4.97;可信区间95%=1.62-15.18:p=0.005),几乎是男性运动员经历心理困扰的五倍。结论:几乎一半的参赛运动员和教练表现出高度的心理困扰,而高度的心理健康似乎可以保护运动员和教练在大流行期间免受负面心理健康后果的影响。在封锁条件下,女运动员和女教练被确定为精神健康挑战的高风险群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信