Effectiveness of Acupressure in Managing the Pain-Fatigue-Sleep Disturbance-Depression Symptom Cluster in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Li-Hua Yang, Si-Yu Li, Ya Yang, Sheng-Nan Yang, Hai-Li Guo, Ming-Ming Hu, Pei-Bei Duan, Chao Xia
{"title":"Effectiveness of Acupressure in Managing the Pain-Fatigue-Sleep Disturbance-Depression Symptom Cluster in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Li-Hua Yang, Si-Yu Li, Ya Yang, Sheng-Nan Yang, Hai-Li Guo, Ming-Ming Hu, Pei-Bei Duan, Chao Xia","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess the effectiveness of acupressure in addressing the symptom cluster of pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depression (P-F-S-D) in patients with cancer through a systematic review. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search was conducted across three English-language medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and two Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of acupressure on the P-F-S-D symptom cluster were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, evaluated the risk of bias, and extracted relevant data in parallel. The risk of bias in eligible RCTs was appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 20 studies (reported in 21 articles) met the inclusion criteria and were classified as either having a low risk of bias or some concerns regarding bias. Meta-analysis revealed that acupressure achieved large-effect reductions in the P-F-S-D symptom cluster compared to both sham acupoint (endpoint standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.84 [-1.05, -0.63], 4-week follow-up SMD = -0.87 [-1.35, -0.39]) and usual care groups (endpoint SMD = -0.68 [-0.83, -0.53], 4-week follow-up SMD = -0.60 [-0.87, -0.33]) (all <i>p</i> = 0.000). Initial high heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 65.6%-67.1%) resolved after sensitivity analysis (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.7%-35.2%), confirming result robustness. Subgroup analysis further revealed that acupressure significantly benefited various symptom combinations, including P-F-S-D, P-F-S, F-S-D, F-S, P-S, and P-F. No serious adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The findings of this study suggest that acupressure should be considered for patients with cancer experiencing the P-F-S-D symptom cluster. However, given the considerable heterogeneity, potential bias, and lack of systematic adverse event reporting in the included studies, further large-scale, multicenter, high-quality RCTs are necessary to better evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupressure for multisymptom relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"860-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of acupressure in addressing the symptom cluster of pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depression (P-F-S-D) in patients with cancer through a systematic review. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across three English-language medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and two Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of acupressure on the P-F-S-D symptom cluster were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, evaluated the risk of bias, and extracted relevant data in parallel. The risk of bias in eligible RCTs was appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software. Results: A total of 20 studies (reported in 21 articles) met the inclusion criteria and were classified as either having a low risk of bias or some concerns regarding bias. Meta-analysis revealed that acupressure achieved large-effect reductions in the P-F-S-D symptom cluster compared to both sham acupoint (endpoint standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.84 [-1.05, -0.63], 4-week follow-up SMD = -0.87 [-1.35, -0.39]) and usual care groups (endpoint SMD = -0.68 [-0.83, -0.53], 4-week follow-up SMD = -0.60 [-0.87, -0.33]) (all p = 0.000). Initial high heterogeneity (I2 = 65.6%-67.1%) resolved after sensitivity analysis (I2 = 19.7%-35.2%), confirming result robustness. Subgroup analysis further revealed that acupressure significantly benefited various symptom combinations, including P-F-S-D, P-F-S, F-S-D, F-S, P-S, and P-F. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that acupressure should be considered for patients with cancer experiencing the P-F-S-D symptom cluster. However, given the considerable heterogeneity, potential bias, and lack of systematic adverse event reporting in the included studies, further large-scale, multicenter, high-quality RCTs are necessary to better evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupressure for multisymptom relief.

穴位按压治疗癌症患者疼痛-疲劳-睡眠障碍-抑郁症状群的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:通过系统评价穴位按压对癌症患者疼痛、疲劳、睡眠障碍和抑郁(P-F-S-D)症状群的治疗效果。方法:在三个英文医学数据库(PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library)和两个中文数据库(中国国家知识基础设施和万方)中进行全面检索。仅纳入随机对照试验(rct),检查指压对P-F-S-D症状群的影响。两名审稿人独立筛选研究,评估偏倚风险,并平行提取相关数据。使用修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB 2.0)评估符合条件的随机对照试验的偏倚风险。采用Stata软件进行meta分析。结果:共有20项研究(21篇文章报道)符合纳入标准,并被分类为低偏倚风险或有偏倚担忧。meta分析显示,与假穴位组(终点标准化平均差[SMD] = -0.84[-1.05, -0.63], 4周随访SMD = -0.87[-1.35, -0.39])和常规护理组(终点SMD = -0.68[-0.83, -0.53], 4周随访SMD = -0.60[-0.87, -0.33])相比,穴位按压在p - f - s - d症状群方面均取得了显著效果(p = 0.000)。敏感度分析(I2 = 19.7% ~ 35.2%)消除了初始高异质性(I2 = 65.6% ~ 67.1%),证实了结果的稳健性。亚组分析进一步显示,穴位按压对P-F- s - d、P-F- s、F-S- d、F-S、P-S和P-F等多种症状组合均有显著益处。无严重不良事件报告。结论:本研究结果提示,对于出现P-F-S-D症状群的癌症患者,应考虑穴位按压。然而,考虑到纳入的研究存在相当大的异质性、潜在偏倚和缺乏系统的不良事件报告,需要进一步开展大规模、多中心、高质量的随机对照试验,以更好地评估指压治疗多症状缓解的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信