Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Khalid Omeir, Jacob Ancira, Rebecca Gabrilska, Craig Tipton, Clint Miller, Ashley Noe, Kumudu Subasinghe, Megan Rowe, Nicole Phillips, Joseph Wolcott, Caleb D Philips
{"title":"Heritable Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Associates With Chronic Wound Microbial Species.","authors":"Khalid Omeir, Jacob Ancira, Rebecca Gabrilska, Craig Tipton, Clint Miller, Ashley Noe, Kumudu Subasinghe, Megan Rowe, Nicole Phillips, Joseph Wolcott, Caleb D Philips","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome-transcriptome-wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue-specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31-39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%-36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reasons for interpatient variability in chronic wound microbiome composition are thought to be complex but are poorly known. To investigate how patients' genetically regulated tissue expression may influence chronic wound bacterial composition, we performed a microbiome-transcriptome-wide association study. This approach involved estimating for 509 patients their tissue-specific gene expression from DNA genotypes, followed by associating gene expression to the relative abundances of species detected in their wounds as provided on clinical reports to the physician. Comparisons to artery, blood, fibroblast, skeletal muscle, skin, subcutaneous fat, and nerve tissue resulted in 251 transcriptional differences at 109 genes significantly explaining abundances of 39 different species. Overall, these species were detected in ~63% of wounds. A similar number of associations per tissue was observed (range 31-39), and many genes were associated at multiple tissues in distinct ways. The cumulative variance across loci for species relative abundance explained ranged from ~5%-36%, depending on species. Although the same gene was almost never associated with more than one species, ~14% of enriched pathways were independently enriched for multiple species, which may reflect the diversity of ways microbes interact with partially overlapping attributes of the wound bed. Commonly enriched pathways pertained to collagen formation and modification, cell signalling, cytoskeletal dynamics, interactions with extracellular matrix, transmembrane proteins, amongst others. This work expands the new perspective that individual genetics may partially determine microbial colonisation and infection.

可遗传的组织特异性基因表达与慢性伤口微生物种类相关。
慢性伤口微生物组组成的患者间差异的原因被认为是复杂的,但鲜为人知。为了研究患者基因调控的组织表达如何影响慢性伤口细菌组成,我们进行了一项微生物组-转录组全关联研究。该方法包括从DNA基因型中估计509名患者的组织特异性基因表达,然后将基因表达与伤口中检测到的物种的相对丰度联系起来,并向医生提供临床报告。与动脉、血液、成纤维细胞、骨骼肌、皮肤、皮下脂肪和神经组织进行比较,发现109个基因的251个转录差异显著地解释了39个不同物种的丰度。总体而言,这些物种在约63%的伤口中被检测到。在每个组织中观察到相似数量的关联(范围31-39),并且许多基因在多个组织中以不同的方式关联。不同物种间相对丰度的累积变异在~5% ~ 36%之间。尽管同一基因几乎从未与多个物种相关,但约14%的富集途径可独立富集于多个物种,这可能反映了微生物与部分重叠的伤口床属性相互作用方式的多样性。通常富集的途径涉及胶原形成和修饰、细胞信号传导、细胞骨架动力学、与细胞外基质的相互作用、跨膜蛋白等。这项工作拓展了个体遗传学可能部分决定微生物定植和感染的新视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信