Diagnostic accuracy and quality of artificial intelligence models in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Ahmed Mourtada Al Qady, Wafa A Aldhaleei
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy and quality of artificial intelligence models in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.","authors":"Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Ahmed Mourtada Al Qady, Wafa A Aldhaleei","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.106836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects approximately 9%-12% of the global population, presenting substantial diagnostic challenges due to symptom subjectivity and lack of definitive biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically examine the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to various biomarkers in IBS diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of six databases identified 18053 articles published up to May 31, 2024. Following screening and eligibility criteria, six observational studies involving 1366 participants from the United Kingdom, China, and Japan were included. Risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2, prediction model risk of bias assessment tool-AI, and transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis-AI tools. Key metrics included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included studies applied AI models such as random forests, support vector machines, and neural networks to biomarkers like fecal microbiome composition, gas chromatography data, neuroimaging features, and protease activity. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 54% to 98% (AUC: 0.61-0.99). Models using fecal microbiome data achieved the highest performance, with one study reporting 98% sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.99). While most studies demonstrated high methodological quality, significant variability in datasets, biomarkers, and validation methods limited meta-analysis feasibility and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI models show potential to improve IBS diagnostic accuracy by integrating complex biomarkers which will aid the development of algorithms to direct treatment strategies. However, methodological inconsistencies and limited population diversity underscore the need for standardized protocols and external validation to ensure clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 23","pages":"106836"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.106836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects approximately 9%-12% of the global population, presenting substantial diagnostic challenges due to symptom subjectivity and lack of definitive biomarkers.

Aim: To systematically examine the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to various biomarkers in IBS diagnosis.

Methods: A comprehensive search of six databases identified 18053 articles published up to May 31, 2024. Following screening and eligibility criteria, six observational studies involving 1366 participants from the United Kingdom, China, and Japan were included. Risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2, prediction model risk of bias assessment tool-AI, and transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis-AI tools. Key metrics included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results: The included studies applied AI models such as random forests, support vector machines, and neural networks to biomarkers like fecal microbiome composition, gas chromatography data, neuroimaging features, and protease activity. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 54% to 98% (AUC: 0.61-0.99). Models using fecal microbiome data achieved the highest performance, with one study reporting 98% sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.99). While most studies demonstrated high methodological quality, significant variability in datasets, biomarkers, and validation methods limited meta-analysis feasibility and generalizability.

Conclusion: AI models show potential to improve IBS diagnostic accuracy by integrating complex biomarkers which will aid the development of algorithms to direct treatment strategies. However, methodological inconsistencies and limited population diversity underscore the need for standardized protocols and external validation to ensure clinical applicability.

肠易激综合征人工智能模型的诊断准确性和质量:系统综述。
背景:肠易激综合征(IBS)影响全球约9%-12%的人口,由于症状主观性和缺乏明确的生物标志物,呈现出实质性的诊断挑战。目的:系统检验人工智能(AI)模型在IBS诊断中应用于各种生物标志物的诊断准确性。方法:对6个数据库进行综合检索,检索到截止到2024年5月31日发表的18053篇论文。根据筛选和入选标准,纳入了6项观察性研究,涉及来自英国、中国和日本的1366名受试者。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估-2、预测模型偏倚风险评估工具- ai以及透明报告个体预后或诊断- ai工具的多变量预测模型来评估偏倚风险和报告质量。关键指标包括敏感性、特异性、准确性和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:纳入的研究将随机森林、支持向量机和神经网络等人工智能模型应用于粪便微生物组组成、气相色谱数据、神经成像特征和蛋白酶活性等生物标志物。诊断准确率为54% ~ 98% (AUC: 0.61 ~ 0.99)。使用粪便微生物组数据的模型获得了最高的性能,一项研究报告了98%的灵敏度和特异性(AUC = 0.99)。虽然大多数研究都显示出很高的方法学质量,但数据集、生物标志物和验证方法的显著差异限制了meta分析的可行性和普遍性。结论:人工智能模型通过整合复杂的生物标志物显示出提高IBS诊断准确性的潜力,这将有助于算法的发展来指导治疗策略。然而,方法上的不一致性和有限的人群多样性强调了标准化方案和外部验证以确保临床适用性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信