Navigate transcranial magnetic stimulation is more reliable than tractography for placing subdural electrodes used for CCEP recording.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
R Carrai, F Battista, C Bonaudo, C Martinelli, F Baldanzi, F Fedi, E Visocchi, Andreea C Aldea, M Spalletti, L Bucciardini, A Amadori, A Grippo, Della Puppa A
{"title":"Navigate transcranial magnetic stimulation is more reliable than tractography for placing subdural electrodes used for CCEP recording.","authors":"R Carrai, F Battista, C Bonaudo, C Martinelli, F Baldanzi, F Fedi, E Visocchi, Andreea C Aldea, M Spalletti, L Bucciardini, A Amadori, A Grippo, Della Puppa A","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of study is to verify whether preoperative nTMS is a reliable tool for the positioning of subdural electrodes for CCEPS recording in presence of minicraniotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a monocentre, prospective, observational cohort study in which we included adults with lesions compressing o infiltrating the peri-sylvian area. In the pre-operative phase, we performed navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) to identify language areas. During the intervention we performed CCEP recordings using subdural strip electrodes positioned according to the surgical conditions or according to nTMS indications or in accordance with tractography. CCEPs were recorded continuously throughout the intervention with the exception of the phases in which it was necessary to monitor a different type of evoked potentials. To evaluate the association between the possibility of registering CCEPs and the method used for the positioning of the subdural electrodes the patients were dichotomized as CCEP present and CCEP not identifiable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 33 subjects but only 28 were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were present between these two-patient group's. The CCEPs were substantially stable during the surgical procedure in 25 patients (89.3%). When strip was positioned according to nTMS (n°:24/28; 85.7%) the CCEP were always recorded while when strip was positioned according to tractography CCEP were not identifiable in 4 (14.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to tractography, nTMS shows a higher reliability in the placement of subdural electrodes used for CCEP recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of study is to verify whether preoperative nTMS is a reliable tool for the positioning of subdural electrodes for CCEPS recording in presence of minicraniotomy.

Methods: This is a monocentre, prospective, observational cohort study in which we included adults with lesions compressing o infiltrating the peri-sylvian area. In the pre-operative phase, we performed navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) to identify language areas. During the intervention we performed CCEP recordings using subdural strip electrodes positioned according to the surgical conditions or according to nTMS indications or in accordance with tractography. CCEPs were recorded continuously throughout the intervention with the exception of the phases in which it was necessary to monitor a different type of evoked potentials. To evaluate the association between the possibility of registering CCEPs and the method used for the positioning of the subdural electrodes the patients were dichotomized as CCEP present and CCEP not identifiable.

Results: We evaluated 33 subjects but only 28 were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were present between these two-patient group's. The CCEPs were substantially stable during the surgical procedure in 25 patients (89.3%). When strip was positioned according to nTMS (n°:24/28; 85.7%) the CCEP were always recorded while when strip was positioned according to tractography CCEP were not identifiable in 4 (14.4%).

Conclusions: Compared to tractography, nTMS shows a higher reliability in the placement of subdural electrodes used for CCEP recordings.

导航经颅磁刺激比神经束造影更可靠地放置硬膜下电极用于CCEP记录。
目的:研究的目的是验证术前nTMS是否是硬膜下电极定位的可靠工具,以便在小切口下记录CCEPS。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究,我们纳入了病变压迫或浸润周围sylvian区域的成年人。在术前阶段,我们采用导航经颅磁刺激(nTMS)来识别语言区。在干预期间,我们根据手术条件或根据nTMS适应症或根据牵道造影定位硬膜下条状电极进行CCEP记录。在整个干预过程中,除了需要监测不同类型诱发电位的阶段外,连续记录ccep。为了评估记录CCEP的可能性与硬膜下电极定位方法之间的关系,将患者分为存在CCEP和未识别CCEP两组。结果:我们评估了33名受试者,但只有28人被纳入分析。两组患者间无统计学差异。25例患者(89.3%)的ccep在手术过程中基本稳定。按nTMS (n°:24/28;85.7%)总有CCEP记录,而根据牵道造影定位条带时,4例(14.4%)无法识别CCEP。结论:与神经束造影相比,nTMS在放置硬膜下电极用于CCEP记录方面显示出更高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信